Question

In: Statistics and Probability

There is some evidence that, in the years 1981 - 85, a simple name change resulted...

There is some evidence that, in the years 1981 - 85, a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v.6, pp. 320- 35, 1987.)

Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock prices of a large sample of corporations shortly after they changed names, and we find that the mean relative increase in stock price was about 0.72%, with a standard deviation of 0.14%. Suppose that this mean and standard deviation apply to the population of all companies that changed names during the past five years. Complete the following statements about the distribution of relative increases in stock price for all companies that changed names during the past five years.

(a) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least____ of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.51 % and 0.93 %.

(b) According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least ____ of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.44 % and 1.00 %.

(c) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately____ of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.44 % and 1.00 %.

(d) Suppose that the distribution is bell-shaped. According to the empirical rule, approximately 99.7% of the relative increases in stock price lie between___%
and ____%.

Solutions

Expert Solution

We are given and .

According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least percent of the relative increases in stock price lie within k standard deviations from mean.

(a) Here we will first find 0.51 and 0.93 are how many standard deviations (value of k) away from mean.

Now we know that 0.51 and 0.93 are 1.5 standard deviations away from mean (0.51 is 1.5 standard deviations below mean and 0.93 is 1.5 standard deviations above mean). Therefore, .

According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least percent of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.51 % and 0.93 %.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Here we will first find 0.44 and 1.00 are how many standard deviations (value of k) away from mean.

Now we know that 0.44 and 1.00 are 2 standard deviations away from mean (0.44 is 2 standard deviations below mean and 1.00 is 2 standard deviations above mean). Therefore, .

According to Chebyshev's theorem, at least percent of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.44% and 1.00%.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) According to Empirical rule, 95% of the data lies within 2 standard deviations from mean. From part b, 0.44 and 1.00 are 2 standard deviations away from mean (0.44 is 2 standard deviations below mean and 1.00 is 2 standard deviations above mean). Therefore:

According to the empirical rule, approximately of the relative increases in stock price lie between 0.44 % and 1.00 %.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) According to Empirical rule, 99.7% of the data lies within 3 standard deviations from mean, that is between and .

According to the empirical rule, approximately 99.7% of the relative increases in stock price lie between %
and %.


Related Solutions

There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85, a simple name change resulted in a...
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85, a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v.6 , pp. 320-35,1987.) Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock prices...
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85 , a simple name change resulted in...
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85 , a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v., pp.320-35, 1987 .) Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock...
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85, a simple name change resulted in a...
There is some evidence that, in the years 1981-85, a simple name change resulted in a short-term increase in the price of certain business firms' stocks (relative to the prices of similar stocks). (See D. Horsky and P. Swyngedouw, "Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective," Marketing Science v.6, pp. 320-35,1987.) Suppose that, to test the profitability of name changes in the more recent market (the past five years), we analyze the stock prices of...
Consider a recent practice change that resulted from research efforts. What were some barriers to implementation?...
Consider a recent practice change that resulted from research efforts. What were some barriers to implementation? What are common barriers for translating research into practice? Please provide references.
A simple random sample of 50 items from a population with = 6 resulted in a...
A simple random sample of 50 items from a population with = 6 resulted in a sample mean of 39. If required, round your answers to two decimal places. a. Provide a 90% confidence interval for the population mean. to b. Provide a 95% confidence interval for the population mean. to c. Provide a 99% confidence interval for the population mean.
Of 1000 randomly selected cases of lung cancer, 823 resulted in death. Is there sufficient evidence...
Of 1000 randomly selected cases of lung cancer, 823 resulted in death. Is there sufficient evidence to say the true proportion of lung cancer deaths is different than 85% at a significance level of 5%. Are the normality assumptions satisfied? Explain why. State hypotheses. Calculate the test statistic What is/are the critical value(s)? What is your decision? What is the conclusion/interpretation of this decision?
2. Provide some evidence (data) of success and some evidence of failure of our national sustainability...
2. Provide some evidence (data) of success and some evidence of failure of our national sustainability public policy (use food, or water, or air, or solid waste or energy as an example…. not all of them). What is your general conclusion? Do we need more rules? More enforcement? More awareness? More money? More responsible consumers? More responsible producers? retailers? Suppose you can’t do all of that at once (you can’t !), which path would you pick first? Explain.
a case that resulted in a legislative change requested by an advocacy group after a fatal...
a case that resulted in a legislative change requested by an advocacy group after a fatal event. In this instance, the family is looking to effect change via the political process. However, this approach is rarely successful. Do you think the concepts of social marketing could be used in this instance or one like it? What are the six basic steps of social marketing?
Identify the following as either a chemical change or physical change, and provide evidence to support...
Identify the following as either a chemical change or physical change, and provide evidence to support your answer: 1. Blue Cu(II) cations of the salt solution react with green Ni(II) cations of its salt solution to produce a turqouise colored solution 2. A blue Copper 2 cation is heater, and the salt color became white and drops of a clear liquid were seen on the side of the test tube. When water was added, the solution turned blue. However, once...
A simple random sample of 70 items resulted in a sample mean of 60. The population...
A simple random sample of 70 items resulted in a sample mean of 60. The population standard deviation is σ = 15. (a) Compute the 95% confidence interval for the population mean. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) _________ to _________ (b) Assume that the same sample mean was obtained from a sample of 140 items. Provide a 95% confidence interval for the population mean. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) _________ to _________ (c) What is the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT