Do you think it's reasonable and appropriate for investors to
"vote their conscience" on social issues? What if he impact of such
a vote is lower profits than might otherwise be possible? How do we
resolve disagreements between investor groups who might have
opposing, but equally passionate, ethical arguments for or against
a particular business decision? (Example: a pharmaceutical
manufacturer has developed a new abortifacient that is quick, safe,
effective, and inexpensive. It would be prescribed by a physician,
but...