Question

In: Economics

A weapons producer sells guns to two countries that are at war with each other. The...

A weapons producer sells guns to two countries that are at war with each other. The guns can be produced at a constant marginal cost of $20. The demand for guns from the two countries can be represented as: QA=240-2P and QB=180-P

a. Suppose the weapons producer can group price discriminate, and charge both countries separate prices for guns. What price does the weapons producer charge each country? How many guns does the weapons producer sell to each country. What is the weapon producer's profit from group price discrimination?

b. Suppose the two countries resolve their differences and ally to wage war on a third country. Unable to prevent resale across borders, the weapons producer can no longer price discriminate. What is the demand of the aggregate market of countries A and B? What is now the weapons producers' profit maximizing price and quantity? What is the weapon producer's profit in this scenario?

c. If this weapons producer could perfectly price discriminate, what would be the producer surplus, consumer surplus, and deadweight loss be in this market?

d. Does the weapons producer prefer to perfectly price discriminate, group price discriminate, or set a single price for both countries? Why?

e. Does group price discrimination make Country A better off, worse off, or have no impact on them? How about Country B?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A) In country A,

Qa=240-2p

P=120-0.5qa

MRa=120-qa

Profit Maximizing quantity at MR=MC

120-qa=20

Qa=100

Pa=120-0.5*100=70

Profit=(70-20)*100=5000

Country B,

Qb=180-p

P=180-qb

MRb=180-2qb

180-2qb=20

Qb=160/2=80

Pb=180-80=100

Profit=(100-20)*80=6400

Total Profit=5000+6400=11,400

B) Aggregate demand:Q=Qa+Qb=240-2q+180-q=420-3p

Profit=TR-TC=420p-3p^2-20*420+60p=480p-3p^2-20*420

∆profit/∆p=480-6p=0

P=480/6=80

Q=420-3*80=180

Profit=(80-20)*180=10,800

C)When seller do perfect price discrimination,then he charges the willingness tonlay by CONSUMERs for each QUANTITY.

So in that case CONSUMERs surplus will be zero.

Produer surplus=1/2*360*(140-20)=180*160=28,800

Deadweight loss =0( all perfect competition equilibrium surplus goes to seller)

D)As seller is earning highest Profit with perfect price discrimination ,so he will like to do perfect price discrimination.

E) Both country will be better with group pricing compare to perfect price discrimination. Because both countries are getting some CONSUMERs surplus with group pricing compare to perfect price discrimination where CONSUMERs surplus is zero.


Related Solutions

A weapons producer sells guns to two countries that are at war with each other. The...
A weapons producer sells guns to two countries that are at war with each other. The guns can be produced at a constant marginal cost of $20. The demand for guns from the two countries can be represented as: QA = 240 – 2P QB = 180 – P a. Suppose the weapons producer can group price discriminate, and charge both countries separate prices for guns. What price does the weapons producer charge each country? How many guns does the...
Consider a weapons producer that is selling guns to two countries that are at war with...
Consider a weapons producer that is selling guns to two countries that are at war with one another. Guns can be produced at a constant marginal cost of $10 per gun. The demand for guns in each of the countries is given by: p = 50 - 0.5Q (Country A) p = 20 - 0.25Q (Country B) a. If the weapons producer can charge different prices to each country, what price and quantity will it sell to each? b. If...
During the war, the same arms merchant often sells weapons to both sides of the conflict....
During the war, the same arms merchant often sells weapons to both sides of the conflict. In this situation, a different price could be offered to each side because there is no danger of resale. Suppose a US arms merchant has a monopoly of a special air-to-sea missiles and is willing to sell them to both India and China. India's demand for missiles is P = 530 - 5x and China's is P = 954 - 8y, where P is...
During the war, the same arms merchant often sells weapons to both sides of the conflict....
During the war, the same arms merchant often sells weapons to both sides of the conflict. In this situation, a different price could be offered to each side because there is no danger of resale. Suppose a US arms merchant has a monopoly of a special air-to-sea missiles and is willing to sell them to both India and China. India's demand for missiles is P = 64 - 4x and China's is P = 80 - 6y, where P is...
How did the development of weapons determine the nature of the Civil War?
How did the development of weapons determine the nature of the Civil War?
Two countries decide to engage in specialization and exchange with each other. As a result, we...
Two countries decide to engage in specialization and exchange with each other. As a result, we can expect: a the price of imported goods to rise and the price of exported goods to fall. b the price of imported goods to fall and the price of exported goods to rise. c the prices of all traded goods to decline. d the prices of all traded goods to increase.
To what extent should society's resources be used to produce new weapons for war?
To what extent should society's resources be used to produce new weapons for war?
Two countries, Algeria and Benin are trading with each other without tariffs. They know that once...
Two countries, Algeria and Benin are trading with each other without tariffs. They know that once they raise tariffs, the other country responds by raising tariffs as well in the next period, which is costly in the long run. However, in the short run Algeria or Benin could gain by individually raising tariffs. If both players could commit to free trade, they would want to do so. (Key: Algeria = Bold | Benin = Italicized) Free Trade Tariffs Free Trade...
As the deadly potential of weapons grows, the problem of war becomes an ever-greater concern. While...
As the deadly potential of weapons grows, the problem of war becomes an ever-greater concern. While conservatives claim that a strong military protects our national interests, liberals don’t support military spending to the degree that conservatives do. How do you respond to someone arguing that the best defense is a good offense? Explain your position on this issue.
1.Two countries, NZ and AUS, trade with each other. Some industries in each country exhibit internal...
1.Two countries, NZ and AUS, trade with each other. Some industries in each country exhibit internal economies of scale while other industries exhibit constant returns to scale. We should NOT expect to see Select one: a. intra-industry trade between NZ and AUS. b. inter-industry trade between NZ and AUS. 2.Suppose that we have the following inverse supply and inverse demand functions for jandals in a small country called New Zealand: p = 20 + 2QS and p = 50 –...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT