Question

In: Finance

"An oil producer is trying to decide if and when it should abandon an oil field....

"An oil producer is trying to decide if and when it should abandon an oil field. For simplicity, assume the producer will abandon immediately (year 0), at the end of year 1, at the end of year 2, or stay at least through the next two years. The major uncertainty is the price of oil, which can go up or down in any year. In each year, there is a 0.33 probability the oil price will go up and a 0.67 probability the oil price will go down. The oil producer decides whether or not to abandon the oil field and then observes whether the price of oil increases or decreases in the following year. The NPV includes all the relevant costs of abandoning the oil field and producing oil and the revenue gained from producing oil. It also already incorporates the producer's MARR. After the producer makes a decision at the end of year 2, we assume there is no more uncertainty. If the producer abandons the oil field at the end of a year, the price of oil in the following years does not impact the producer's NPV.
Solve a decision tree to calculate what the oil producer should do immediately, at the end of year 1, and at the end of year 2. You should assume an expected-value decision maker.
Enter the expected NPV of the best alternative. The best alternative may have a negative expected NPV.
- If the producer decides to abandon the oil field immediately, the NPV is -$43,000
- If the producer decides to abandon at the end of year 1 and the oil price goes up, the NPV is $0
- If the producer decides to abandon at the end of year 1 and the oil price goes down, the NPV is -$60,000
- If the producer decides to abandon at the end of year 2 and the oil price goes up in years 1 and 2, the NPV is $72,000
- If the producer decides to abandon at the end of year 2 and the oil price goes up in year 1 and goes down in year 2, the NPV is $37,000
- If the producer decides to abandon at the end of year 2 and the oil price goes down in year 1 and goes up in year 2, the NPV is -$4,000
- If the producer decides to abandon at the end of year 2 and the oil price goes down in years 1 and 2, the NPV is -$120,000
- If the producer decides to not abandon the oil field and the oil price goes up in years 1 and 2, the NPV is $41,000
- If the producer decides to not abandon and the oil price goes up in year 1 and goes down in year 2, the NPV is $21,000
- If the producer decides not to abandon and the oil price goes down in year 1 and goes up in year 2, the NPV is -$37,000
- If the producer decides not to abandon and the oil price goes down in years 1 and 2, the NPV is -$86,000"

Solutions

Expert Solution

The producer has 4 choices :

i) to abondon immediately

ii) To abandon at the end of year 1

iii)To abandon at the end of year 2 and

iv) To not abandon ,

The producer should choose the one where the NPV is most positive or least negative

1.Abandon the oil field immediately, the NPV is -$43,000

2.  Abandon at the end of year 1

Expected NPV = 0.33* Expected NPV in case the price goes up + 0.67* Expected NPV in case the price goes down

= 0.33*0+0.67*(-$60000)

= -$40200

3. Abandon at the end of year 2

Expected NPV= 0.33*0.33*Expected NPV in case the price goes up in year 1 and year 2+0.33* 0.67* Expected NPV in case the price goes up in year 1 and down in year 2 + 0.67* 0.33* Expected NPV in case the price goes down in year 1 and up in year 2 +0.67* 0.67* Expected NPV in case the price goes down in year 1 and down in year 2

= 0.33*0.33*72000 +0.33*0.67*37000+0.67*0.33*(-40000)+0.67*0.67*(-120000)

= -$46690.50

4) Not abandon

Expected NPV= 0.33*0.33*Expected NPV in case the price goes up in year 1 and year 2+0.33* 0.67* Expected NPV in case the price goes up in year 1 and down in year 2 + 0.67* 0.33* Expected NPV in case the price goes down in year 1 and up in year 2 +0.67* 0.67* Expected NPV in case the price goes down in year 1 and down in year 2

= 0.33*0.33*41000 +0.33*0.67*21000+0.67*0.33*(-37000)+0.67*0.67*(-86000)

= -$37678.10

As the NPV is least negative in the case when the producer does not abandon the project

The producer should not abandon the project


Related Solutions

"An oil producer is trying to decide if and when it should abandon an oil field....
"An oil producer is trying to decide if and when it should abandon an oil field. For simplicity, assume the producer will abandon immediately (year 0), at the end of year 1, at the end of year 2, or stay at least through the next two years. The major uncertainty is the price of oil, which can go up or down in any year. In each year, there is a 0.49 probability the oil price will go up and a...
"An oil producer is trying to decide if and when it should abandon an oil field....
"An oil producer is trying to decide if and when it should abandon an oil field. For simplicity, assume the producer will abandon immediately (year 0), at the end of year 1, at the end of year 2, or stay at least through the next two years. The major uncertainty is the price of oil, which can go up or down in any year. In each year, there is a 0.37 probability the oil price will go up and a...
Ben Parker, Executive Producer for Epic Productions Film Company, is trying to decide when to reorder...
Ben Parker, Executive Producer for Epic Productions Film Company, is trying to decide when to reorder the 35 millimeter film his photographers use for publicity photos. 35 mm film is used by the Epic photographers at a fairly constant rate, with an average demand during leadtime of 75 rolls and a variance of 25 rolls. (Ben would agree that the daily usage of 35 mm film seems to be normally distributed.) The leadtime on an order of 35 mm film...
The senior executives of an oil company are trying to decide whether to drill for oil...
The senior executives of an oil company are trying to decide whether to drill for oil in a particular field in the Gulf of Mexico. It costs the company $300,000 to drill in the selected field. Company executives believe that if oil is found in this field its estimated value will be $1,800,000. At present, this oil company believes that there is a 48% chance that the selected field actually contains oil. Before drilling, the company can hire a geologist...
Describe the cost-benefit analysis an individual should use when trying to decide whether or not to...
Describe the cost-benefit analysis an individual should use when trying to decide whether or not to invest in general on-the-job training. Explain why these decisions may differ for women versus men. Graphical analysis is strongly encouraged.
1. Describe the cost-benefit analysis an individual should use when trying to decide whether or not...
1. Describe the cost-benefit analysis an individual should use when trying to decide whether or not to invest in general on-the-job training. Explain why these decisions may differ for women versus men. Graphical analysis is strongly encouraged. 2. Explain general and firm-specific on-the-job training. Would employers be less likely to invest in general on-the-job training if they regard women as more likely to leave? Why or why not? Would employers be less likely to invest in firm-specific training if they...
Jami and Fred are two neighbors and they are trying to decide if they should put...
Jami and Fred are two neighbors and they are trying to decide if they should put a hedge between their two yards to increase their privacy. The cost of the hedge would be $1,000. Jami values the hedge at $800 and Fred values the hedge at $600. If there is no hedge the status quo remains and they each have net benefits of zero. The plan would be for each neighbor to contribute half of the cost for the hedge....
Jami and Fred are two neighbors and they are trying to decide if they should put...
Jami and Fred are two neighbors and they are trying to decide if they should put a hedge between their two yards to increase their privacy. The cost of the hedge would be $1,000. Jami values the hedge at $800 and Fred values the hedge at $600. If there is no hedge the status quo remains and they each have net benefits of zero. The plan would be for each neighbor to contribute half of the cost for the hedge....
The Strill Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted...
The Strill Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide RM1,200,000 in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs RM6,700,000 and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over 4 years. Strill's tax rate is 35 percent, and the firm can borrow at 11 percent. Nexgain Leasing Company has offered to lease the...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $4.1 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $9.1 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over 5 years. Wildcat's tax rate is 22 percent, and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert Leasing Company has offered to...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT