After reviewing the ACA and APA Code of Ethics, how would you use
the ethical principles...
After reviewing the ACA and APA Code of Ethics, how would you use
the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy,
justice, and fidelity when approaching client care in a mental
health and wellness program?
Solutions
Expert Solution
Counselors are often faced with situations that require sound
ethical decision-making ability. Determining the appropriate course
to take when faced with a difficult ethical dilemma can be a
challenge.
Several foundational principles are the underpinnings of best
ethical practice and are viewed as central to the process of
ethical decision making within the helping professions.
Beauchamp and Childress (1979) identified four principles that
are at the core of ethical reasoning in health care:autonomy,
justice, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. Kitchener (1984) added a
fifth principle of fidelity. She viewed these five principles as
the cornerstone of ethical guidelines for counselors.
The five bedrock principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence,
nonmaleficence, and fidelity are each vital in and of themselves to
a healthy counseling relationship.
1.Autonomy is the principle that addresses respect for
independence, and self-determination. The essence of this principle
is allowing an individual the freedom of choice and action.
It addresses the responsibility of the counselor to encourage
clients, when appropriate, to make their own decisions and to act
on their own values. There are two important considerations in
encouraging clients to be autonomous.
First, helping clients to understand how their decisions and
their values may be received within the context of the society in
which they live, and how they may impinge on the rights of
others.
The second consideration is related to the client’s ability to
make sound and rational decisions. Persons not capable of making
competent choices, such as children and some individuals with
mental disabilities, should not be allowed to act on decisions that
could harm themselves or others.
2.Justice, as Kitchener (1984) points out, is “treating equals
equally and unequals unequally but in proportion to their relevant
differences”. Justice does not mean treating all individuals the
same.
If an individual is to be treated differently, I as a counselor
need to be able to offer a rationale that explains the necessity
and appropriateness of treating the individual differently.
An example of justice is that if I as a counselor would give a
person who is blind a form that is in braille, or would go through
the form with that individual orally, instead of giving him or her
a standard written form to fill out. But I would treat him or her
the same as any other client in all other regards.
3.Beneficence reflects the counselor’s responsibility to
contribute to the welfare of the client. Simply stated, it means to
do good, to be proactive, and also to prevent harm when possible.
Beneficence can come in many forms, such as prevention and early
intervention actions that contribute to the betterment of
clients.
4.Nonmaleficence is the concept of not causing harm to others.
Often explained as “above all, do no harm,” this principle is
considered by some to be the most critical of all the
principles.
This principle reflects both the idea of not inflicting
intentional harm, and not engaging in actions that risk harming
others.Weighing potential harm against potential benefits is
important in a counselor’s efforts toward ensuring “no harm.”
So,for instance,as a professional counselor,I can make an
exception to my duty of keeping my client's details a secret and in
order to report to the authority sometimes,if the matter is really
serious regarding the health of the client, that a patient has said
she/he has an immediate plan to harm someone. A desire to prevent
harm to my patient’s intended victim I need to act out on this
priniciple.
5.Fidelity involves the notions of loyalty, faithfulness, and
honoring commitments. Clients must be able to trust the counselor
and have faith in the therapeutic relationship if growth is to
occur. Therefore, as a counselor I must take care not to threaten
the therapeutic relationship or to leave obligations
unfulfilled.
According to the APA Ethics Code, was the psychologists’
involvement in this study ethical or unethical? Apply the General
Principles and Ethics Codes Standards to the following dilemma:
Case Study: In 2014, investigators from several academic
research institutions collaborated with Facebook to test whether
reducing the number of positive or negative messages people saw
made them less likely to post positive or negative content
themselves (Kramer, Guillory, & Hancock, 2014). The experiment
was carried out by manipulating the algorithm by...
In addition to the most current APA Ethical Principles of
Psychologists and Code of Conduct, select one other ethics code
from a professional social science association and examine how both
ethical codes interweave the four basic principles of ethics into
its model for the appropriate conduct of research.
The APA ethics code expresses ethical standards for external
factors including resolving ethical issues, human relations,
advertising and public statements, research and publication, and
therapy. Why do you believe the APA established these standards?
What is an ethical dilemma that could arise under one of these
standards? Would the dilemma still exist if there was no
established standard? Support your position.
Review the six guiding principles of the Advocacy Code of Ethics
and discuss how the principles relate to what you will do as a
health science professional as an advocate for health promotion.
(National Association of Healthcare Advocacy Code of Ethics)
<-----LOOK UP
The APA ethics code expresses ethical standards for internal
factors including competence, privacy/confidentiality, record
keeping and fees, education and training, and assessment. Why do
you believe the APA established these standards? What is an ethical
dilemma that could arise under one of these standards? Would the
dilemma still exist if there was no established standard? Support
your position.
The APA ethics code expresses ethical standards for internal
factors including competence, privacy/confidentiality, record
keeping and fees, education and training, and assessment. Why do
you believe the APA established these standards? What is an ethical
dilemma that could arise under one of these standards? Would the
dilemma still exist if there was no established standard? Support
your position.