Question

Review the Medsker and McDorman article and Nixon's resignation address. How is the President treated as the accused by the courts? The Justices admit they were not "required to proceed against the president as against an ordinary individual" (United States v. Nixon 708, 715). What do you think Aristotle would have thought of this?

Answer 1

The United States v Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a milestone in the United States Supreme Court case which resulted in a collective decision against President Richard Nixon, by commanding him to surrender tape recordings and other summoned elements to a federal district court.

It was issued on July 24, 1974. The judgment was significant to the later steps of the Watergate scandal. There was an open-ended impeachment process against Richard Nixon. They consider The United States v. Nixon a significant model restricting the power of any U.S. President to claim executive privilege.Chief Justice Warren E. Burger drafted the judgment for a unanimous court, Justices William O. Douglas, William J. Brennan, Potter Stewart, Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun and Lewis F. Powell accompanied which against the President.

Due to the demolition of federal ordinances by certain officers of the White House and political followers of the President, the Special Prosecutor registered a motion under Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 17(c) for summoned elements for the production before trial of several tapes and documents linking to identified communications and meetings between the President and others.

Fishman presented Aristotle's thoughts on Prudential Presidency. He argues that the representation of political leadership based on the judgment that was introduced by Aristotle 2300 years ago. These ideas remain the most pragmatic and general model available for embracing the qualities important for American presidents to succeed in office. Aristotle is compared with such influential presidential scholars as Richard Fishman argues that the model of political leadership based on the concept of prudence remains the most realistic and comprehensive paradigm available for comprehending the qualities necessary for American presidents to succeed in office. It compares Aristotle with such influential presidential philosophers as James David Barber, Richard Neustadt, and George Edwards III.

It also applies Aristotle's approach to critical presidential decisions from Washington to Clinton. Fishman's analysis of leading hypotheses of the presidency reveals that Aristotle's paradigm of prudent political administration most accounts for presidential behavior.