In: Accounting
HolmesWatson (HW) is considering what the effect would be of
reporting its liabilities under IFRS rather than U.S. GAAP. The
following facts apply:
Required:
1. For each item, indicate how treatment of the
amount would differ between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
2. Consider the total effect of items a–d. If HW’s
goal is to show the lowest total liabilities, which set of
standards, U.S. GAAP or IFRS, best helps it meet that goal?
Part 1
U.S. GAAP |
IFRS |
|||
a |
Accrue liability |
6900000 |
Accrue liability |
9400000 |
b |
Accrue liability |
6900000 |
Accrue liability |
7400000 |
c |
Do not accrue liability |
Accrue liability |
7900000 |
|
d |
Long-term liability |
11900000 |
Short-term liability |
11900000 |
(6900000+11900000)/2 = 9400000
(4900000+9900000)/2 = 7400000
(4900000+10900000)/2 = 7900000
Explanation:
a. The loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.
U.S. GAAP = accrue a liability = 6900000
IFRS = accrue a liability = midpoint of the range = 9400000
b. U.S. GAAP = present values would not be considered due to uncertain timing of cash flows= lower end of the undiscounted range = 6900000
IFRS = present values would be used = relevant midpoint of the range = 7400000
c. only probable according to IFRS’s use of the term. IFRS = relevant midpoint of the range = 7900000
d. Financing was obtained prior to financial statement issuance but not before the balance sheet date
U.S. GAAP = long-term liability
IFRS = short-term liability
Part 2
Which set of standards helps to meet that goal? |
U.S. GAAP |
U.S. GAAP |
IFRS |
|||
a |
Accrue liability |
6900000 |
Accrue liability |
9400000 |
b |
Accrue liability |
6900000 |
Accrue liability |
7400000 |
c |
Do not accrue liability |
Accrue liability |
7900000 |
|
d |
Long-term liability |
11900000 |
Short-term liability |
11900000 |
Total |
25700000 |
Total |
366000000 |