In: Accounting
HolmesWatson (HW) is considering what the effect would be of
reporting its liabilities under IFRS rather than U.S. GAAP. The
following facts apply:
Required:
1. For each item, indicate how treatment of the
amount would differ between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
2. Consider the total effect of items a–d. If HW’s
goal is to show the lowest total liabilities, which set of
standards, U.S. GAAP or IFRS, best helps it meet that goal?
U.S GAAP |
IFRS | |||
a |
Accure liabilty |
5,500,000 |
Accure liabilty |
80,00,000 |
b |
Accure liabilty |
5,500,000 |
Accure liabilty |
60,00,000 |
c |
Do not accure liability |
Accure liabilty |
65,00,000 | |
d |
Long-term liability |
10,500,000 | Short-term liability | 10,500,000 |
Explanation:
a.The loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.
U.SGAAP=accrue a liability=5,500,000
IFRS=accrue a liability=midpoint of the range=80,00,000
b.U.S.GAAP=present values would not be concidered due to uncertain timing of cash flows=lower end of the undiscounted range=5,500,000
IFRS=present values would be used =relevant mid point of the range=60,00,000
c.Only probable according to IFRS's use of the term.
IFRS=relevant midpoint of the range=65,00,000
d.Financing was obtained prior to financial statement issueance but not before the balnce sheet data
U>S GAAP=long-term liability
IFRS=short-turm liyability
part2
Which set of standerds help to meet that goal? |
U.S GAAP |
U.S GAAP |
IFRS | |||
a |
Accure liabilty |
5,500,000 |
Accure liabilty |
80,00,000 |
b |
Accure liabilty |
5,500,000 |
Accure liabilty |
60,00,000 |
c |
Do not accure liability |
Accure liabilty |
65,00,000 | |
d |
Long-term liability |
10,500,000 | Short-term liability |
10,500,000 |
Total | 2,15,00,000 | Total | 3,10,00,000 |