In: Operations Management
I think I have this figured out, but need a double check... Thank you
Here is the question:
Regional distributors are currently using continuous review
inventory policy. Compute and describe their inventory management
policy and associated cost. Ignore inbound and outbound
transportation cost. Provide answers and calculations for order
quantity, demand during lead time, safety stock, average inventory
level, inventory holding cost per week, ordering cost per week, and
total cost per week.
The service level is 90% and the average lead time is 2 weeks.
Here is the style I used to answer.
Q* |
Ddlt |
SS |
Avg Inv |
Inv cost |
Ord Cost |
Tot Cost |
|
Atlanta |
|||||||
Boston |
|||||||
Chicago |
|||||||
Dallas |
|||||||
LA |
|||||||
Total cost of the distribution system |
Supporting info:
Inbound TRANSPORTATION COSTS PER UNIT PRODUCT | ||||||
Warehouse | Inbound | Outbound | ||||
Atlanta | $ 12.00 | $ 13.00 | ||||
Boston | $ 11.50 | $ 13.00 | ||||
Chicago | $ 11.00 | $ 13.00 | ||||
Dallas | $ 9.00 | $ 13.00 | ||||
Los Angels | $ 7.00 | $ 13.00 | ||||
Table 3: Outbound Transportation Costs per Unit in Single Centralized System | ||||||
Warehouse | atlanta | boston | chicago | dallas | los angles | |
Atlanta | $ 13.00 | |||||
Boston | $ 16.00 | $ 13.00 | ||||
Chicago | $ 16.00 | $ 10.00 | $ 13.00 | |||
Dallas | $ 17.00 | $ 17.00 | $ 17.00 | $ 13.00 | ||
Los Angels | $ 19.00 | $ 19.00 | $ 18.00 | $ 10.00 | $ 13.00 | |
Table 4: Ordering Cost and Holding Costs (per unit per week) | |||
cost at | ordering cost | holding cost | |
current system | regional warehouse | $ 5,550.00 | $ 1.25 |
central warehouse | central warehouse | $ 5,550.00 | $ 1.25 |
mixed model | central warehouse | $ 3,000.00 | $ 1.00 |
fegional wareshoue | $ 3,000.00 | $ 1.25 |
HISTORICAL demand for 12 weeks | ||||||||||||
Week | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Atlanta | 33 | 45 | 37 | 38 | 55 | 30 | 18 | 58 | 47 | 37 | 23 | 55 |
Boston | 26 | 35 | 41 | 40 | 46 | 48 | 55 | 18 | 62 | 44 | 30 | 45 |
Chicago | 44 | 34 | 22 | 55 | 48 | 72 | 62 | 28 | 27 | 95 | 35 | 45 |
Dallas | 27 | 42 | 35 | 40 | 51 | 64 | 70 | 65 | 55 | 43 | 38 | 47 |
Los Angels | 32 | 43 | 54 | 40 | 46 | 74 | 40 | 35 | 45 | 38 | 48 | 56 |
Answer - There is limited information shared in the question. I have assumed ordering cost & Holding cost as it was not clearly spelled out.
There is a huge gap between ordering cost and holding cost so the value of Q looks in appropriate. I have tried to illustrate the concept with formula so that you may recheck the value of ordering cost & holding cost to update the solution at your end.
The solution is explianed in below table and inputs are also taken from above two tables
Pl note thatr Z for 90% is 1.28