In: Math
In 1997, the average household expenditure for energy was $1,338, according to data obtained from the U.S. Department of Energy. An economist claims that energy usage today is different from its 1997 level. In a random sample of 36 households, the economist found the mean expenditure, adjusted for inflation, for energy in 2004 to be $1,423. with a sample standard deviation s = 360.
At a 95% level of confidence (α = .05), we wish to test the economists claim.
1. State the Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis for this experiment.
| a. | 
 Ho: p = $1,338 Ha: p not = $1,423  | 
|
| b. | 
 Ho: µ <= $1,338 Ha: µ > $1,338  | 
|
| c. | 
 Ho: µ = $1,423 Ha: µ not = $1,423  | 
|
| d. | 
 Ho: µ = $1,338 Ha: µ not = $1,338  | 
2.What is the p-value and decision of this research?
| a. | 
 p-value = .165; Do Not Reject Ho.  | 
|
| b. | 
 p-value = .165; Reject Ho.  | 
|
| c. | 
 p-value = .0825; Do Not Reject Ho.  | 
|
| d. | 
 P-value = .0825; Reject Ho.  | 
3.State the conclusion.
| a. | 
 With 95% Confidence, there is sufficient evidence to show that energy usage today is different from its 1997 level.  | 
|
| b. | 
 With 95% Confidence, there is insufficient evidence to show that energy usage today is different from its 1997 level.  | 
|
| c. | 
 With 95% Confidence, there is sufficient evidence to show that energy usage today is greater than its 1997 level.  | 
|
| d. | 
 With 95% Confidence, there is insufficient evidence to show that energy usage today is greater than its 1997 level.  | 
4.State the Type I error for this Hypothesis Test and the corresponding probability of a Type I error occurring in this experiment.
| a. | 
 Conclude energy usage is not different, but it really is. Probability = .05  | 
|
| b. | 
 Conclude energy usage is not different, but it really is. Probability = .95  | 
|
| c. | 
 Concluded energy usage is different, but it really isn't. Probability = .95  | 
|
| d. | 
 Conclude energy usage is different, but it really isn't. Probability = .05  | 
5.In order to decrease the probability of a Type I error, we would do the following before conducting this experiment:
| a. | 
 Increase the Confidence Level of the Hypothesis Test, thereby decreasing alpha.  | 
|
| b. | 
 Decrease the Confidence Level of the Hypothesis Test, thereby decreasing alpha.  | 
|
| c. | 
 Increase the sample size from 36.  | 
|
| d. | 
 Decrease the sample size from 36.  | 
1 to 3:

3) option B
| 
 With 95% Confidence, there is insufficient evidence to show that energy usage today is different from its 1997 level.  | 
4) D
| 
 Conclude energy usage is different, but it really isn't. Probability = .05 5) On the opposite, too large samples increase the type 1 error because the p-value depends on the size of the sample, but the alpha level of significance is fixed. A test on such a sample will always reject the null hypothesis 
  |