In: Finance
Mortgage Selection Corin Tucker, a real estate developer, is considering several new projects. To finance these purchases, she will take out either a fixed rate or an adjustable rate mortgage (ARM). Although the ARM has a lower interest rate, it comes with the added risk of the rate increasing over time. Corin thus considers two scenarios: favorable future interest rates and unfavorable future interest rates. If the future rates are favorable, then the present value of financing the projects with the fixed rated mortgage is $2 million and the present value of financing the projects with the ARM is $2.5 million. On the other hand, if future interest rates are unfavorable, then the present value of financing the projects with the ARM is $1.5 million, while the present value of using the fixed rate mortgage remains at $2 million. She currently believes that future rates will be favorable with a probability of 7/15 and unfavorable with a probability of 8/15.
Lance, Corin’s assistant, has pointed out that future interest rate changes are likely dependent on who becomes the mortgage company’s new president. This decision will be announced in November. So, if Corin waits until the new president’s identity has been announced, her decision will be better informed. However, by waiting until November (it is currently August), she will likely miss out on one of the projects, which will lower the overall value of the investment. To analyze the situation, Corin calculates the present value of the investment under this scenario (waiting until November) for both types of loans under both circumstances (favorable and unfavorable future interest rates).
Present Value | Favorable Future Rates | Unvaforable Future Rates |
Fixed | $1.8 | $1.8 |
ARM | $2.3 | $1.3 |
To utilize this information in the analysis, Lance spent the
weekend researching the historical connection
between interest rate movement and new bank presidents. He broadly
categorized bank presidents into
two types (A and B), finding 60 past instances in which a type A
person became a bank president and 50
instances where a type B person became a bank president. When a
type A person became bank
president, favorable interest rates ensued in 20 of the instances
and unfavorable rates ensued in the
remaining cases. When a type B person became bank president,
favorable rates ensued 30 times and
unfavorable rates ensued in the remaining cases.
Because information about the bank’s executive hiring strategy
is exceedingly scarce, Corin and Lance
agree to assign a probability of 0.5 to each type of person
becoming president.
Perform the appropriate analysis to determine what course of
action should be taken. Namely, when
should the decision be made (August or November), and which type of
loan should be taken (fixed or
ARM)?
Because interest rates and mortgage options change often, choice of mortgage type should depend on:
The interest rates and mortgage options available when you're buying a house
view on the future rates (generally, high inflation will mean ARM rates will go up and lower inflation means that they will fall)
Personal financial and investment goals, and
How willing you are to take a risk.
When mortgage rates are low, a fixed rate mortgage is the best bet for many buyers. Over the next five, ten, or 30 years, interest rates are more apt to go up than further down. Even if rates could go a little lower in the short run, an ARMs teaser rate will adjust up soon and you won't gain much if you plan to stay in the house more than a few years. In the long run, ARMs are likely to go up, meaning many buyers will be best off locking in a favorable fixed rate now and not taking the risk of much higher rates later.