Lets discuss a few Benefits and Discrepancies for all the four
techniques of Capital Budgeting: before concluding why there is a
difference in recommending these four techniques
1. Benefits & Discrepancies in NPV
Technique:
Benefits:
- It considers Time Value Money Concept.
- Considers entire cash flow stream during the life of the
project.
- It is based on cash flow than accounting profits
- NPV can use different rate of cost of capital for different
time period and projects hence objectivity in analysis
Limitations:
- Requires predetermined rate of cost of capital
- Involves lengthy calculations
- Ignores initials size of investment
2. Benefits & Discrepancies in IRR
Technique:
Benefits:
- It considers Time Value Money Concept.
- Considers entire cash flow stream during the life of the
project.
- It is based on cash flow than accounting profits
- IRR can use different rate of cost of capital for different
time period and projects hence objectivity in analysis
- IRR recommends those projects which would have higher returns
than internal cost of capital thus helps maximizing shareholders
wealth
Limitations:
- Involves tedious calculations
- assumes reinvesting future cash flows at a rate equals to
IRR
3. Benefits & Discrepancies in PI
Technique:
The benefits and limitation of PI are very much close to that of
NPV
4. Benefits & Discrepancies in Payback Period
Technique:
Benefits:
- A very simple concept to use and understand
- Facilitates selection of less risky project
Limitations:
- Ignores cash flow post payback period
- Does not consider Time Value Money Concept
Conclusion: After discussing merits and
demerits of all the four capital budgeting techniques, we can say
that there are discrepancies and differences in recommendations of
the four techniques because of the following reasons:
- Use of cash flows in payback period vs. discounted cash flows
in other three
- Use of one rate for cost of capital vs. multiple rates for cost
of capital
- consideration of different size of initial investment in IRR
and ignoring the same in NPV
- Difference in ranking under NPV and IRR for different size of
investments.
- Consider whole amount of cash flows in NPC, IRR and PI and
ignoring post payback period cash flows in Payback period
method.
- Ease of calculations in Payback, NPV and PI but difficulty in
IRR
Thus, we can say that both NPV and IRR would give same
accept-reject conclusions but the ranking would be different under
both the technique. PI is just a different way of expressing
conclusion than NPV. payback period concept could be used just to
make an initial analysis followed by either NPV or IRR techniques
based on the situation either we are working on mutual exclusive
proposal or independent proposals.