Question

MARKETING DEBATE—Whom Should You Target With New Products?

Some new products experts maintain that getting close to customers through intensive research is the only way to develop successful new products. Other experts disagree and maintain that customers can’t possibly provide useful feedback on what they don’t know and can’t provide insights that will lead to breakthrough products.

1. To address this debate, identify and explain a few advantages and disadvantages to each of the two positions.
2. Identify and discuss variables that might make one position or the other more attractive. Variables might include items such as industry type, product life cycle, product adoption rates, etc.
3. Now identify a company that you work for or are interested in. Articulate your recommendations regarding the role that research would have for new product development in this company.

If you feel that customer research is not appropriate for this company, identify the research processes that you would use.

Answer 1

Favorable circumstances of Customer Research

1. Any item to be presented in the market requires broad cash to be put resources into creating and promoting the item till it gets acknowledged or dismissed. Research helps controlling these expenses by shunning items which probably won't be acknowledged by the clients

2. Research helps in understanding the market and advertising the item in zones where significant interest is assessed

3. Research helps in structuring the item precisely as wanted by the clients

4. At times hardly any changes in the current item is all that could possibly be needed and can spare time, cost and endeavors than going for an altogether new item and presenting it without any preparation

Burdens of Research

1. This doesn't work for inventive items where the client doesn't have the foggiest idea what is going to come

2. Research doesn't help when the client feels there is no need of an item yet once the item is in the market, it can change the lives of clients in incomprehensible manner - these are called troublesome items

3. Research has its natural predispositions where a specific speculations is confirmed and once in a while unconsciously the specialists will in general spotlight on bunches which approve their hypotheses and can create slanted information

4. Research may confine the innovative work staff to seek after just peripheral changes in the items dependent on the clients' recommendations and desires and cutoff their potential in looking for extensive items which comes through creative mind of new items

-

In technolgical enterprises where another telephone, PC, PC, programming and so forth come each second, month or year research won't be extremely useful in picking up fortress in the market. Here the clients like to purchase another item every other day and when the examination study results come close by, the entire mentality and want of the clients will have changed. In such enterprises the R and D group must be continually at war with the new advancements and improvize continually.

Then again lets take the case of family items industry and sleeping cushions explicitly where a client purchases an item simply after there is extensive positive reaction (informal reaction) and where the item lifecycle is more prominent than the mechanical circle. Today in showcase there are an entire array of sleeping pads accessible for assortment of necessities, for spinal pain, for sciatica, for muscle cramps and so forth with numerous sorts of texture and fillers like froth, coir, adjustable foam and so on. To think of another bedding which tends to a particular issue/need, it requires broad research. First recognize where the client is confronting issue at that point search for manners by which it tends to be tended to. At that point test the outcomes by welcoming scarcely any clients to utilize the item and give input, in light of the criticism certain upgrades could be made. In such businesses, explore is inescapable and will prompt better client acknowledgment rates.

Let us take the case of Apple. Here research sure has its job yet isn't the key. On the off chance that apple trusted that individuals will frame thoughts with respect to what they requirement for better music hearing experience, there could never have been I-case by then. They went for creative and leap forward items without sitting tight for the client needing it. Anyway as referenced before, inquire about plays a key job here also in distinguishing issues/needs of clients which would require items with improved highlights and as opposed to going for minor upgrades, the new item advancement group needs to search for just bits of knowledge from clients and create leap forward items.

Please give a like, if this answer helps you. Thank You.