Question

Sens. Reintroduce Privacy Law for Substance Use Disorder Treatment

The bipartisan senate proposal, Protecting Jessica Grubb’s Legacy Act, would modernize 42 CFR Part 2 privacy regulation to support substance use disorder treatment and improve care coordination.

By Jessica Davis

March 04, 2020 - Sens. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, and Shelley Moore Capito, R-West Virginia, reintroduced the Protecting Jessica Grubbs Legacy Act, a privacy bill designed to modernize 42 CFR Part 2 regulations to improve data sharing and privacy around the medical records of substance use disorder patients.

As it stands with the current 42 CFR Part 2, it’s difficult or impossible to share addiction records. The bill was first introduced during the Obama Administration in response to a patient story: Jessica Grubbs was recovering from substance use disorder when she had surgery. However, the discharging doctor did not see that information and sent Grubbs home with oxycodone. She later died of an overdose.

“No family or community should ever have to go through the senseless and preventable tragedy that Jessica Grubb and her family had to endure,” Manchin said in a statement. “This bipartisan bill is essential to combatting the opioid epidemic and ensuring that these painful deaths are prevented.”

Dig Deeper

• Proposed Bill Cracks Down on Privacy Violations, Empowers FTC, Consumers
• Proposed Bill Would Close HIPAA Gaps, Curb Health App Privacy Risks
• Senator Proposes Privacy Bill Giving Consumers Greater Data Control

“By making changes to the existing regulations regarding the medical records of patients with substance use disorder, we can save thousands of lives,” he continued. “No one should go to the doctor expecting to receive help and instead be thrown back into the nightmare of addiction. We must do more to combat this crisis as a country.”

The senators have since made updates to the initial bill that would still bolster data sharing, while protecting patient privacy. For one, the bill requires affirmative, written consent from patients to opt into and share their medical records.

The bill also added an education component to ensure patients understand what patients are consenting to before opting into data sharing and expands the scope the bill to align it completely with all HIPAA regulations. There will also be an opt-out clause to give patients the right to rescind consent if they change their minds in the future.

The proposed legislation also protects patients from discriminatory behavior targeted at substance use disorder, including access to treatment, employment termination, worker’s compensation receipt, rental housing, social services, and benefits.

Lastly, the legislation also ensures all industry stakeholders are included in the implementation of the act by requiring the Department of Health and Human Services’ Secretary to collaborate with legal, clinical, privacy, and civil rights experts to update the code of federal regulations to implement the bill’s provisions.

Industry stakeholders have been pushing for an update to 42 CFR Part 2 for a number of years but have yet to come to an agreement. The rule has been called “cumbersome and out-of-date” by 39 state attorneys general, HHS has been asked to align the rule with HIPAA, and efforts have asked Congress to do the same.

In August, HHS released its own proposal to overhaul privacy restrictions for substance abuse treatment programs of 42 CF Part 2.

Manchin and Capito’s proposal has received overwhelming support from a number of industry stakeholders. Premier called the bill a “carefully balanced approach” that will address care coordination, while strengthening privacy protections.

The National Association of ACOs (NAACOS) also supports the bill, saying it “should draw broader support to update privacy protections for patients with substance use disorders.”

“After decades of obstacles to providing coordinated care for these patients, it is critical that barriers from outdated laws be removed, which this bill would do,” a NAACOS spokesperson said in a statement. “While this won’t provide full alignment with HIPAA that NAACOS has been pushing for, it would make an important update to improve the treatment of patients with substance use disorder.”

“Accountable care organizations and their clinicians have largely been blind to the medical history of their patients because they were made responsible for patients’ care but only give part of their data,” they added. “Moving to a system that better pays for quality and value requires well-coordinated care, and providers must be given a better understanding of their populations, while respecting patient privacy.”

Assignment:

Recall that healthcare policy tends to change when a problem reaches a critical point and has become so significant that the general public is moved to request and support legislation to address and, hopefully, resolve it.

After you've reviewed the short article that is in our reading material for this week - and consider the proposed regulations that we looked at last week, think about the implications of the existing regulatory changes and the newly proposed legislation.

In our discussion, answer the following questions:

(a) Do you think that the problem can be addressed by changing the regulation or would you agree with Senators Manchin and Capito that a new statute is needed? What's the difference between a statute and a regulation?

(b) If you are a therapist who treats patients with substance use problems, what ethical concerns might you have about allowing this data to be shared without a patient's authorization? Would your concerns increase if minors who are substance abusers are involved?

(c) If you wanted to voice your opinion on the proposed bill, how would you do that?

Answer 1

Answer:-

A)

Indeed these issues can be tended to by changing the regulations since regulations incorporate commonsense utilizations of the law so they can support more.

The difference between statutes and regulations is-

Statutes are laws made by parliament or the governing body and are likewise knows as acts they may make another law or change a current one.

while Regulations are the standards that address the detail and viable utilizations of the law .

The position to make regulations identified with an Act is doled out inside that Act. Much the same as statutes regulations have the full power of law.

B)

Tell a suitable organization immediately in the event that you are worried that a youngster or youngster is in danger of , or is enduring maltreatment or disregard. Get counsel on the off chance that you are worried about the chance of misuse or disregard, however don't accept that the kid or youngster is in danger of huge damage. Secrecy isn't a flat out obligation .

You can share private data about an individual if -

You should do by law or in light of a court request.

It is supported in the open intrigue.

C)

Your voice and sentiments are amazing your individual from congress is chosen to speak to your interests . It is dependent upon you to voice concerns and to make your voice heard. On the off chance that you set aside the effort to pass on your contemplations to your chosen authorities and catch up with them

Get included

Reaching your individual from congress by email, letter , telephone , meet in region office , issue a talking greeting .

please like the answer........