Explain the notion of “self” from both a Buddhist and Christian
perspective. How do these two...
Explain the notion of “self” from both a Buddhist and Christian
perspective. How do these two perspectives differ? How are they
similar?
Solutions
Expert Solution
The Buddha taught that an individual
is a combination of five aggregates of existence, also called the
Five Skandhas or the five heaps-
Form
Sensation
Perception
Mental Formations
Consciousness
Generally, the first skandha is our
physical form.
The second is made up of our feelings
-- both emotional and physical -- and our senses -- seeing,
hearing, tasting, touching, smelling.
The third skandha, perception, takes
in most of what we call thinking -- conceptualization, cognition,
reasoning. This also includes the recognition that occurs when an
organ comes into contact with an object. Perception can be thought
of as "that which identifies." The object perceived may be a
physical object or a mental one, such as an idea.
The fourth skandha, mental
formations, includes habits, prejudices, and predispositions. Our
volition, or willfulness, is also part of the fourth skandha, as
are attention, faith, conscientiousness, pride, desire,
vindictiveness, and many other mental states both virtuous and not
virtuous. The causes and effects of karma are especially important
to the fourth skandha.
The fifth skandha, consciousness, is
awareness of or sensitivity to an object, but without
conceptualization. Once there is awareness, the third skandha might
recognize the object and assign a concept-value to it, and the
fourth skandha might react with desire or revulsion or some other
mental formation.
The skandhas are empty. They are not
qualities that an individual possesses because there is no-self
possessing them. This doctrine of no-self is called anatman or
anatta.
The Buddha taught that "you" are not
an integral, autonomous entity. The individual self, or what we
might call the ego, is more correctly thought of as a by-product of
the skandhas.
On the surface, this appears to be a
nihilistic teaching. But the Buddha taught that if we can see
through the delusion of the small, individual self, we experience
that which is not subject to birth and death.
According to the Buddha, self is not
truth. He declared," Where self is, truth is not. Where truth is,
self is not. Self is the fleeting error of samsara; it is
individual separateness and that egotism which begets envy and
hatred."
He defined self as "that yearning
which seeks pleasure and lusts after vanity where as Truth is the
correct comprehension of things, which is the permanent and
everlasting, the real in all existence and the bliss of
righteousness."
The very existence of self is an
illusion,. It is the Self, which through its activity, produces all
the wrongs, vice and evil in the world. One can attain truth only
when one accepts the self as an illusion. Righteousness can be
practiced only when the mind is freed from the influence of
egotism. Perfect peace comes only when all the vanity of the self
has disappeared.
The Buddha therefore preached that
one should aim to remove the very idea of self from the
consciousness which is possible only by removing all forms of
desires, feelings and sensations through the practice of the
eightfold path.
Christianity sees the self
negatively, distorted through sin: 'The heart is deceitful above
all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?' Alternately,
each human self or spirit is a unique creation by God. The
"desperately wicked self" is the sinful self that has chosen to be
"curved back upon itself", but ever with the potential of changing
and (by God's grace) turning toward "'new life', opened out to love
of God and neighbor".
Christians define themselves by their
appearance ,intelligence ,abilities and possessions as well as by
their relationship with others and the way others look at them. A
positive self concept help us to feel good about ourselves whereas
a negative self concept makes us feel bad and the fluctuating self
concept causes us to feel lost and unsure about everything.
The Christian “self-concept” begin
with the image of God, an understanding of the proper ordering and
functioning of the human soul, and a loving relationship with
everyone.
They believe that the
self-definitional feedback comes neither from parents nor from
peers, but from the Gospel of Christ, the writings of the fathers,
and the lives of the Saints.
Christianity teaches them to value
what is truly valuable and learning to let go of those things that
are passing away.
Self-awareness is an area that
Christians sometimes feel guilty about, but the reality is that
this is how God has made them.
Self awareness is equated with sin
but only as far as it seemed that when Adam and Eve sinned, the
first thing they became aware of, was themselves! Thereafter, every
single human being has that tendency, to be self aware.
Christianity says- “Do not think of
yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself
with sober judgment.” Another way of putting that might be to say,
“Be aware of yourself and see yourself exactly as you are.
Christianity defines self esteem
completely differently. BIBLE tells us that Christians belief in
attaining Self worth and esteem by having a good relationship with
god.
Buddhism and Christianity were both
founded by great Spiritual Masters who sought to offer a path to
salvation. The terminology they used was often quite different.
Also, given the different circumstances they incarnated in, they
taught different paths and emphasised different approaches to
spirituality.
Buddhism emphasizes the endless cycle
of birth and rebirth and the idea of reincarnation. Christianity
teaches we have one life and one chance.
Like Buddhism, Christianity also
encourages followers to take steps to improve their well being.
Like Christianity, Buddhism has a strong devotional aspect. This is
characterised by faith in the Buddha. This is especially marked in
traditions such as Pure Land Buddhism, which stresses prayer to the
Buddha.
Both aspire to greater spiritual
perfection. Though they may have different approaches they are both
seeking a higher spiritual perfection.
Explain how air bags save lives from both a Impulse-Momentum
perspective and a Work-Energy Perspective.
Create a mathematical proof for each perspective to prove your
point.
1. How do you feel about Apple's tax strategies from both a
moral and business perspective? Explain fully your point of
view.
2. Discuss who benefits from the tax strategy: all the
stakeholders benefit or just the shareholders?
3. Discuss fully why you believe their tax strategies are either
ethical or unethical and legal or illegal?
4. Classify the Apple tax strategies as one of the following and
explain fully your point of view.
Ethical and Illegal
Ethical, but...
How does Mead distinguish between the body and the self? How is
the self both a subject and an object? How is the ability to assume
the "role of the other" so vital to being human? What does Cooley
mean by "the looking glass self" and how does it relate to the
social self?
How do Substance abuse prevention programs differ from
intervention programs? Explain. From a prevention perspective, why
is the age of onset an important issue in the addictions field?
Explain.
Briefly explain how the two key building blocks of behavioural
finance are incompatible with the notion of efficient capital
markets.
Clearly explain the following terms:
Cognitive psychology
Heuristics
Cognitive Dissonance
According to Hong and Stein (1999) large firms are less prone
to mispricing when there is divergence of opinion. Briefly explain
this statement.
Students will be required to explain, from a legal and ethical
perspective, two Federal laws that affect accountant's
responsibility and liability. The overall grade will be based on
(1) the ability to identify the relevant perspectives (G201).