Question

In: Computer Science

Ford buys in about two thirds of its car parts from outside suppliers. At one time,...

Ford buys in about two thirds of its car parts from outside suppliers. At one time, Ford employed 500 people to order components, receive the parts and pay suppliers. Ford believed that by rationalizing procedures and installing new computer systems, it could reduce staffing levels to about 400. However, Mazda a Japanese car company, already did the same job using less than 100 staff. Even allowing for scale differences between the two organizations, the gap was enormous. The main difference was in business procedures. Mazda did not wait for invoices from its suppliers. In contrast, Ford’s purchasing department created a purchase order, a copy of which is sent to accounts payable. Subsequently, when the goods were received, goods inward sent a copy of the receiving documents to accounts payable; which also received an invoice from the supplier. It was accounts payable’s responsibility to match the purchase order against the receiving document and the invoice, then issue payment. In practice, the department spent most of its time investigating mismatches. Ford’s original idea was to use computers to streamline the investigation procedure. However, Mazda’s experience highlighted the need for a redesign of a complete business process. As a result, Ford has developed an ‘invoiceless processing’ payment system. In this system, when purchasing department raises an order, it enters information into an online database. When parts arrive at goods inward department, it enters the information into an online database. When parts arrive at goods inward department, a warehouse man waves a barcode reader over the label, entering the parts inventory and sending electronic payment to the supplier. As a result, the clerical and data processing complexity is eliminated. Through these changes, ford has achieved a 75% reduction in headcount, rather than the 20% it would have achieved had the original plan gone ahead. With reference to the Case Study above, identify and briefly explain any benefit (only one) that Ford enjoyed, or expected to have enjoyed, by adopting Mazda’s Business Handling Style. Your responses to this question should be done using the following three separate components; and clearly numbering each component. In one word, a phrase or at most one sentence, identify and state the benefit.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The above scenario shows the automation of purchase ordering process in Ford Company

The purchase process includes the following stages:

  1. Raise a purchase order
  2. Send order copy to supplier
  3. Receive goods
  4. Verify the copy of receiving documents
  5. Verify the invoice of inward goods
  6. Match the purchase order against receiving document and invoice
  7. Issue the payment to supplier

Since all the process is done in different stages , the physical documents needed to be passed between various sections in the department (like warehouse, dispatch, accounts and production).This is very time consuming process and requires a lot of human effort. It was also mentioned that the investigation procedures consumed most of the time in dealing with the mismatched documents.

For this problem , Ford decided to perform all this process in a computerised procedures and rationalising the activities.The following are the key points to be observed:

  • Eliminates the use of In voices
  • The computerised procedure eliminated use of paper documentation rather maintained the data in an On-line database
  • All the purchase orders are made online and the data regarding purchase orders is maintained in the online database
  • All the inward goods information will be maintained in the online database
  • The inventory management for the received shipment (goods) is automated thereby eliminating errors caused by manual data entry
  • All the payments are made electronically (on-line payment).
  • Reduced human effort to a maximum extent (requires 75% lesser staff than manual process )
  • )

The benefit of implementing computerised purchasing system

Ford has enjoyed a benefit of reduced costs incurred for staffing of employees for manual processing in terms of time and money more than what it was expected to have. The benefits were boke down into three components as :

  • Low administrative costs in processing
  • Accuracy and Speed of processing
  • Centralised data management
  1. Low administrative costs in processing

Overall staff reduced by 75%

Staff required

Processing done manually

500

Computerised processing

125

Staff employed for ordering (manual process)    = 500

Staff to be reduced in online processing (75% of 500) = 375

Staff required for online processing = 500-375 = 125

It is a known fact that , the lesser the staff ,the administrative control will be better.

  1. Accuracy and Speed of processing

Since the data is maintained on an online data base , the data is made available to all the departments present in the company .Also , the same data can be used for inventory management and verification of inward goods.

The data entry at the inventory is done with bar code scanner so there will be fewer errors in data being updated into the database.

Since the payment transactions to the seller is done electronically, they will be immediately credited into the accounts payable thereby reducing the time involved in clearance of cheques which require few days for crediting into payable accounts.

  1. Centralised data management

Since the data is stored on an on–line database ,they could be accessed by all the departments and the data is maintained consistently compared to physical documentation. Also the data could be used for Auditing whenever required.Also , if the company wants to purchase from more number of suppliers , the same infrastructure is enough which makes the processing system a scalable one


Related Solutions

Miso Computer produces computer parts and buys platinum from one of its suppliers. Each part carries...
Miso Computer produces computer parts and buys platinum from one of its suppliers. Each part carries 1 ounce of copper. Annual demand for parts follows a normal distribution with an average of 7000 parts and a standard deviation of 2000. The copper supplier takes 5 weeks to deliver the material after the order is placed. Miso uses 40% annual interest to compute the cost of maintaining inventory. Copper buys it at $0.25 per ounce. The company uses a short material...
Q1. ABCD is going to purchase an auto parts component from one of two competing suppliers...
Q1. ABCD is going to purchase an auto parts component from one of two competing suppliers and it is going to base its decision, in part, on the supply chain performance of the two suppliers. The company has obtained the following data for average raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods inventory value, as well as cost of goods sold for the suppliers. Assume each supplier operates 50 weeks per year. Supplier 1 Supplier 2 Cost of goods sold $8,500,000 $14,800,000...
A manufacturer is considering purchasing parts from three different suppliers. The parts received from the suppliers...
A manufacturer is considering purchasing parts from three different suppliers. The parts received from the suppliers are classified as having a minor defect, having a major defect, or being good. Test results from samples of parts received from each of the three suppliers are shown below. Note that any test with these data is no longer a test of proportions for the three supplier populations because the categorical response variable has three outcomes: minor defect, major defect, and good. Supplier...
A manufacturer receives parts from two suppliers. An SRS of 400 parts from supplier 1 finds...
A manufacturer receives parts from two suppliers. An SRS of 400 parts from supplier 1 finds 20 defective; an SRS of 100 parts from supplier 2 finds 10 defective. Let p1 and p2 be the proportion of all parts from suppliers 1 and 2, respectively, that are defective. Is there evidence of a difference in the proportion of defective parts produced by the two suppliers? To make this determination, you test the hypotheses H0 : p1 = p2 and Ha...
Base on the YouTube video about the Ford Motor Company’s car the Ford Pinto in the...
Base on the YouTube video about the Ford Motor Company’s car the Ford Pinto in the Business Ethics lesson component. Ford said that it was too expensive to fix the defect on the Pinto, and basically put a price on the human life--$11. 1. How does this make you feel? 2. Do you believe that major corporations really care about the safety of consumers, or do they still cut corners for the sake of profits? ***Limit 200 words, not go...
StarPoint manufactures engine parts for Ford using two plants, one in Austin, TX and one in...
StarPoint manufactures engine parts for Ford using two plants, one in Austin, TX and one in Fairfax, VA. The Inverse Demand functions (demand curves) for the two StarPoint plants are: Austin: PA= 30 - 0.125QA Fairfax: PF= 35 - 0.25QF Where QA and QF are outputs of engine parts (in units) from the Austin and Fairfax plants, respectively. The marginal cost of production in Austin (MCA) is 10 and the marginal cost of production in Fairfax (MCF) is 5. If...
Jill's Job Shop buys two parts (Tegdiws and Widgets) for use in its production system from...
Jill's Job Shop buys two parts (Tegdiws and Widgets) for use in its production system from two different suppliers. The parts are needed throughout the entire 52-week year. Tegdiws are used at a relatively constant rate and are ordered whenever the remaining quantity drops to the reorder level. Widgets are ordered from a supplier who stops by every five weeks. Data for both products are as follows: ITEM TEGDIW WIDGET Annual demand 14,000 9,000 Holding cost (% of item cost)...
A grocery store buys Italian gelato from different suppliers and sells the desserts to its customers...
A grocery store buys Italian gelato from different suppliers and sells the desserts to its customers for $5 per pint. In September, the following purchases and sales occurred. You are to find the COGS, ending inventory and Gross Margin using FIFO and LIFO. September 2, purchase 30 pints at $2.50 each September 6, purchase 20 pints at $3 each September 20, purchase 25 pints at $4 each September 5-8, sell 10 pints to customers September 9-19, sell 20 pints September...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $14 $10 2 $14 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $10 $14 $10 2 $16 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT