Question

In: Economics

Should Canada have used the recent renegotiation of NAFTA to reconsider free trade with the United...

Should Canada have used the recent renegotiation of NAFTA to reconsider free trade with the United States and instead to use tariffs to protect domestic manufacturing in Canada?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The NAFTA or the North American Free Trade Agreement was abolished in the year 2018, with the set-up of USMCA or United States Mexico Canada Agreement. It put into place a fair deal for most countries to help them in growing and ensuring free trade among the participating nations.

That said, the implications of the agreement were different for all countries. Canada in specific banks high on its in house production of dairy products and had trade restrictions in place on goods that were imported from USA of dairy products in place for protecting their own interests.

With the abolishing of the NAFTA and a new Agreement coming into light, the United States can now freely sell daily products in the country. Also other sectors which get affected are iron and steel and prescription medicine since patent rights have increased from the existing 7 years to 10 years respectively.

But, the focus here as per the case study is whether or not Canada should introduce a strategy to protect its domestic interests using a tariff.

A tariff generally refers to a tax in which needs to be paid before a foreign good can enter the country. It is aimed at protecting the interests of the domestic country.

That said, in general if Canada was to not agree to the new policy and increase tariffs to protect its interests it would result in more bad points than positive ones. Generally, any country that adopts a protectionist policy is most likely to have more of it in the future this results in other countries having counter policies which end up being negative for both countries in the long run.

In this situation, the existence of trade agreements is because of the fact, that these represent why tariffs shouldn't be used. As a strategy tariffs are only regressive and the protection they give to the markets for a small period of time hinder their growth in the world economy meaning that technically advanced countries progress more and the demand for home grown commodities tend to decline in the foreign market.

Therefore, in my opinion Canada should not increase tariffs in order to protect domestic manufacturing but rather should focus on manufacturing higher quality products which can give competition to any imports that take place and increase their technological knowledge rather than go on protecting the industry which will stop growing with tariff related policies.

Please feel free to ask your doubts in the comments section.


Related Solutions

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and...
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and Mexico. decreased had no effect on increased none of the above
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada,...
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico whose purpose is to eliminate tariffs between the countries and promote all aspects of international trade. There are many arguments for and against the treaty. One of the arguments against centers on the fact that Mexican industries do not have to meet the same environmental regulations as industries in the United States and Canada. The U.S. and Canada have intervened in the...
Compare the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). How are...
Compare the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). How are they different? Are these changes likely to lead to material changes for Canada?
NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's....
NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's. This agreement eliminates trade barriers between these countries and allows trade to move freely without tariffs or restrictions. However, there is a downside to this. Look at "in the News" on pg. 782 of the text on jobs relating to NAFTA. How do agricultural workers feel about this agreement? How about construction workers? The comparative advantage in these countries has changed due to NAFTA....
Describe how trade agreements such as GATT and NAFTA have facilitated free and equitable trade among...
Describe how trade agreements such as GATT and NAFTA have facilitated free and equitable trade among nations over the past 10 years.
NAFTA is a well known free trade agreement. What are arguments in favor of continuing NAFTA...
NAFTA is a well known free trade agreement. What are arguments in favor of continuing NAFTA and what are arguments in favor of discontinuing NAFTA?
Most unions have opposed free trade agreements, such as NAFTA. On the other hand, most employer...
Most unions have opposed free trade agreements, such as NAFTA. On the other hand, most employer lobbying groups have supported such agreements. Create an argument for one side or the other.
Is the new trade agreement negotiated by President Trump with Mexico and Canada to replace NAFTA...
Is the new trade agreement negotiated by President Trump with Mexico and Canada to replace NAFTA more beneficial or more harmful to the United States economy than NAFTA?
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found...
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found that: (A) Canada was not able to increase its exports due to barriers still remaining. (B) Canada had modest gains but was harmed by immigration into the United States from Mexico. (C) Canada had more trade diversion than trade creation and so was harmed overall. (D) Canada had more trade creation than trade diversion and so benefited overall.
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found...
A case study of NAFTA, with regard to the benefits for Canada from U.S. trade, found that: (A) Canada was not able to increase its exports due to barriers still remaining. (B) Canada had modest gains but was harmed by immigration into the United States from Mexico. (C) Canada had more trade diversion than trade creation and so was harmed overall. (D) Canada had more trade creation than trade diversion and so benefited overall.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT