4. Cost of debt versus cost of equity. Because the cost of debt is lower than...

4. Cost of debt versus cost of equity. Because the cost of debt is lower than the cost of equity, firms must increase their use of debt as much as possible to increase the firm’s value. What is your answer to this argument?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A firm's value is inversely related to its weighted average cost of capital.

As any asset, a firm's value is the PV of its expected cash flows discounted at the WACC. That being so, the value of a firm would be maximum when the cost of capital is at its minimum. Hence, the objective of a firm of maximizing its value is achieved when the WACC is at its minimum.

The only way to lower WACC is to increase the proportion of that source of capital whcih has lower cost.

Hence, a firms value can be increased by increasing the proportion of debt [called financial leverage] in its capital structure.

But, that can be done only up to a certain proportion of debt in relation to total capital, which, is considered optimum.

Upto a certain level of debt considered normal for a business, both the equity holders and debt holders would be willing to supply funds at the lowest rate [which considers normal risk at normal level of debt]. Till that point is reached, the WACC will decrease as the debt % is increased from 0%. But, after that normal level of debt, the suppliers of capital [both equity and debt] would start feeling that the financial risk of the firm is increasing and would ask for higher returns. The cost of debt as well as equity would then go up at an inceasing rate. As a result the WACC which was decreasing would start to go up. That will mean that the firms value which, initially was increase with the proportion of debt, will start going down with the increase in the proportion of debt. Hence, a firm cannot add debt beyond the point after which WACC would increase.

The proportion of debt and equity at which the WACC will be the minimum giving the maximum firm value, is called the optimum structure. Thus, there is an optimum level of debt beyond which its proportion cannot be increased.

jeff jeffy answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Which is lower for a given company: the cost of debt or the cost of equity?...

Which is lower for a given company: the cost of debt or the cost of equity? Explain. Ignore taxes in your answer. Include a discussion of the risk-return relationship and how this factors into an investor's decision to select and investment for their portfolio.

Debt is typically lower cost than equity. However, what are some advantages to increasing WACC and...

Debt is typically lower cost than equity. However, what are some advantages to increasing WACC and having a capital structure weighted with more equity? (Please explain this in some detail to help me understand)

“The cost of equity can never be cheaper than the cost of debt considering an equity...

“The cost of equity can never be cheaper than the cost of debt considering an equity investor is the last taker of funds, should the worse come to worst for the issuer. And he requires compensation for such risk”. Critically evaluate the remark above from the viewpoint of global finance.

It is not uncommon to hear people say that because debt has a lower cost of...

It is not uncommon to hear people say that because debt has a lower cost of capital than equity, a firm can reduce its overall WACC by increasing the amount of debt financing. If this strategy works, shouldn’t a firm take on as much debt as possible, at least as long as the debt is not risky? Explain your answer using M&M Proposition II

1. a. Explain why the cost of debt is lower than the cost of capital? 1....

1. a. Explain why the cost of debt is lower than the cost of capital? 1. b. Explain what is meant by the statement- depreciation is a non-cash expense and how do companies use it. 1. c. How long does it take money earning 12% to double? Use both the rule of 72 and your financial calculator. 1. d. Explain the three ways a company can raise capital. 1. e. If an investor has a short term view on her...

Why would equity cost more than debt?

It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.

It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.TrueFalse

It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.

It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.True False

A) If the cost of debt is typically significantly less than the cost of equity (especially...

A) If the cost of debt is typically significantly less than the cost of equity (especially on an after-tax basis), what do you think about the idea of capitalizing (or funding) a business entirely with debt? Explain your reasoning in 200-500 words. B) If you were a venture capitalist considering providing funding to a cash-constrained firm, what criteria could you use to assess the accuracy of their cash flow forecasts and the adequacy of their requested cash injection? Explain in...

Generally speaking, the cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. Does it imply...

Generally speaking, the cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. Does it imply that a firm should increase its debt-to-equity ratio to as high as possible such that its corporate cost of capital can be minimized?

Subjects