Generally speaking, the cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. Does it imply...

Generally speaking, the cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. Does it imply that a firm should increase its debt-to-equity ratio to as high as possible such that its corporate cost of capital can be minimized?

Solutions

Expert Solution

In order to minimize WACC, the capital structure must consist of a balanced combination of debt and equity.

IF we incrrease Debt tp equity ratio, means a business takes on more and more debt, its probability of defaulting on its debt increases. if the debt of a company is high this means the equity shareholder will demand more retrun whioch will then increase the cost of equity so eventually increasing more debt will again increasce the WACC rather. which would be reduced if optimal mix could be used.

The optimal capital structure is one that minimizes the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) by taking on a mix of debt and equity.

The cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. It does not imply that a firm should increase its debt-to-equity ratio to as high as possible such that its corporate cost of capital can be minimized.

For any clarification comment.

Please thumps up, Thank you

jeff jeffy answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

“The cost of equity can never be cheaper than the cost of debt considering an equity...

“The cost of equity can never be cheaper than the cost of debt considering an equity investor is the last taker of funds, should the worse come to worst for the issuer. And he requires compensation for such risk”. Critically evaluate the remark above from the viewpoint of global finance.

The WACC formula implies that debt is “cheaper” than equity, that a firm with more debt...

The WACC formula implies that debt is “cheaper” than equity, that a firm with more debt could use lower discount rate. Does this make sense? Explain briefly

Debt is generally cheaper then equity so why don’t companies finance themselves almost completely with debt?...

Debt is generally cheaper then equity so why don’t companies finance themselves almost completely with debt? How much debt is too much debt? Why would issuing additional debt bring a benefit to shareholders in terms of increased return on equity? Be sure to address all three points mentioned in this question.

Explain three forces that can make debt cheaper than equity for corporate financing

Debt is a cheaper source of financing than equity because Group of answer choices equityholders face...

Debt is a cheaper source of financing than equity because Group of answer choices equityholders face greater risk than creditors because of the residual nature of their claim, and they expect a higher return as compensation. interest on debt is tax deductible, but returns to owners are not. All of these are correct. debt is tax deductible, which reduces the effective cost of borrowing. Two of these are correct.

What generally happens to the cost of debt, cost of equity, and cost of capital when...

What generally happens to the cost of debt, cost of equity, and cost of capital when a firm increases Debt and holds Equity constant?

4. Cost of debt versus cost of equity. Because the cost of debt is lower than...

4. Cost of debt versus cost of equity. Because the cost of debt is lower than the cost of equity, firms must increase their use of debt as much as possible to increase the firm’s value. What is your answer to this argument?

Why would equity cost more than debt?

Questions: What are the advantages of debt over equity? If debt is cheaper, why would anyone...

Questions: What are the advantages of debt over equity? If debt is cheaper, why would anyone choose equity? How do taxes play a role in this? Assume the following for a standard bond issue within the United States: The face value of the bonds is $95,000. Stated rate on the bond is 8%. Interest is paid every 6 months (8%/2 = 4% every payment). The bonds are due in 10 years. Assume 3 scenarios, the market rate is 8%, 7%,...

It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.

It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.TrueFalse

Subjects