Question

In: Accounting

A) If the cost of debt is typically significantly less than the cost of equity (especially...

A) If the cost of debt is typically significantly less than the cost of equity (especially on an after-tax basis), what do you think about the idea of capitalizing (or funding) a business entirely with debt? Explain your reasoning in 200-500 words.

B) If you were a venture capitalist considering providing funding to a cash-constrained firm, what criteria could you use to assess the accuracy of their cash flow forecasts and the adequacy of their requested cash injection? Explain in 200-500 words.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans A: When the cost of debt is significantly lower than the cost of equity than It is always wise that one should use the maximum of debt in his capital structure. But at the same time, we should not forget that using debt as the only source in the capital will also lead to another danger that is the payment of interest on the debt taken.

Interest is always an expense item and it will deteriorate the profit further for low profit making company & for new startups, and this will downgrade the business value in open market.

Hence, It is always advisable that one should strike a balance between debt & equity while drawing the capital structure.

Since here in this case cost of debt is quite lower as compare to equity, it is advisable to use more of debt, but entire capital should not be funded by only debt since it brings some drawback with itself. Hence the ideal situation would be to fund the capital by debt in the range of 60% to 75% and other the rest should be funded by equity. So that a proper and healthy capital structure can be drawn upon.


Related Solutions

Debt is typically lower cost than equity. However, what are some advantages to increasing WACC and...
Debt is typically lower cost than equity. However, what are some advantages to increasing WACC and having a capital structure weighted with more equity? (Please explain this in some detail to help me understand)
Are taxes necessary for the cost of debt financing to be less than the cost of...
Are taxes necessary for the cost of debt financing to be less than the cost of equity financing? I need clear answer not picture
4. Cost of debt versus cost of equity. Because the cost of debt is lower than...
4. Cost of debt versus cost of equity. Because the cost of debt is lower than the cost of equity, firms must increase their use of debt as much as possible to increase the firm’s value. What is your answer to this argument?
“The cost of equity can never be cheaper than the cost of debt considering an equity...
“The cost of equity can never be cheaper than the cost of debt considering an equity investor is the last taker of funds, should the worse come to worst for the issuer. And he requires compensation for such risk”. Critically evaluate the remark above from the viewpoint of global finance.
Why would equity cost more than debt?
Why would equity cost more than debt?
It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.
It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.TrueFalse
It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.
It is probably easier to estimate the cost of equity than it is to estimate the cost of debt.True False
Generally speaking, the cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. Does it imply...
Generally speaking, the cost of debt is cheaper than the cost of equity. Does it imply that a firm should increase its debt-to-equity ratio to as high as possible such that its corporate cost of capital can be minimized?
Within a firm, debt is always less expensive than equity. Why then would a firm also...
Within a firm, debt is always less expensive than equity. Why then would a firm also use equity to finance projects if debt is less expensive?
Within a firm, debt is always less expensive than equity. Why isn’t the WACC always the...
Within a firm, debt is always less expensive than equity. Why isn’t the WACC always the appropriate interest rate to use when determining the value of a project?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT