Question

In considering a literature review it is important to consider how your research can best build upon work that has already been done. How can one do this if the literature gives divergent perspectives and there is no absolute common theme?

Answer 1

Literature Review

The essence of having a literature review is to investigate the previous works by other scholars in regard to the current research. Most of this literature tends to have various perspectives and themes according to the researcher’s objectives and area of study. Due to the divergent perspectives of these works one must be keen in identifying the various themes being discussed and determine whether they relate with his or her research objectives. Mostly, the literature will start on a general view before concentrating on the particular study area. It is therefore important for the reader to first review the wider scope and the facts or assumptions being made in the work before embarking on the presentation of the research theme. In addition, previous works are not only good for helping in writing own work but also it is helpful for widening the author’s knowledge in the research topic.

As a researcher, the review must be well evaluated, structured and organized such that the aspects discussed in various literatures are grouped together and discussed with their findings. They must also be synthesized such that they are able to infer from the work. Literature review is a vital part of every research project. It is therefore important for this information to be digested so that one is able to identify whether what he or she is researching on has been done and if so whether there is a chance for modification. With good understanding of the previous works the researcher is able to plan and anticipate the challenges that may arise and also identify the areas that require further research. In conclusion, it very important to read and review the previous researches even if they might be focusing on different themes. This information will give the researcher divergent views on what is important.