In: Economics
What does the revenue equivalence theorem say? Given an example to illustrate the revenue equivalence theorem.
The revenue equivalence theorem states that for certain economic environments, the expected revenue and bidder profits for a broad class of auctions will be the same provided that bidders use equilibrium strategies.
The Revenue Equivalence Theorem
Theorem 1
If there are two bidders with values drawn from U[0,1], then any standard auction has an expected revenue 1/3 and gives a bidder with value v and expected profit of v^2 / 2, the same as the second-price auction.
Theorem 2
If there are N bidders with values drawn from a continuous distribution (e.g. uniform on [a, b]), then any standard auction leads to the same expected revenue, and same expected bidder profit, as a second-price auction.
Example: Second Price Auction
The second price auction is a standard auction. The payment rule has t(bi,bj ) equal to zero if bi < bj , and equal to bj if bi > bj . In equilibrium, each bidder bids his value, so the equilibrium strategy is b(v) = v. In equilibrium the bidder with the higher value will win, and pay the bid (or equivalently value) of the lower-valued bidder. The expected revenue is 1/3. Why 1/3? If we take two draws from a uniform distribution on [0,1], the higher draw will be on average 2/3 and the lower draw will be on average 1/3. Notice also that if a bidder has value v, he expects to win whenever the other bidder has a value less than v; which happens with probability equal to v. If he does win, he expects to pay v/2. So the expected profit of a bidder with value v is U(v) = v.(v - v/2) = v ^2 / 2.