In: Statistics and Probability
Teaching as usual |
Teaching+examples |
Teaching+safety training |
General+Person totals |
T =220 |
T =162 |
T =117 |
Σx2 =7753 |
SS =264.92 |
SS =113.23 |
SS =580 |
G =499 |
n =13 |
n =13 |
n =13 |
N =39 |
M =16.92 |
M =12.46 |
M =9 |
k =3 P2 Σ k =6644.33 |
Given all of this informations, the researchers obtained the following results table:
Source |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
Between treatments |
410.21 |
2 |
136.74 |
4.7 |
Within |
958.15 |
36 |
||
Between subjects |
259.69 |
12 |
||
Error |
698.46 |
24 |
29.1 |
|
Total |
1368.36 |
38 |
They also found an effect size of partial − η2 =0.37.
Null Hypothesis H0: The mean number of explosions are equal for all teaching methods.
Alternative Hypothesis Ha: Not all the mean number of explosions are equal for teaching methods.
Critical value of F at df = 2, 36 and 0.05 is 3.26
Since the observed test statistic (4.7) is greater than the critical value (3.26) , we reject H0 and conclude that there is a significant evidence that not all the mean number of explosions are equal for teaching methods.
Mean difference between Teaching as usual and Teaching+examples is 16.92 - 12.46 = 4.46
Mean difference between Teaching as usual and Teaching+safety training is 16.92 - 9 = 7.92
Mean difference between Teaching as usual and Teaching+examples is 12.46 - 9 = 3.46
Since the mean difference between Teaching as usual and Teaching+safety training is greater than Tukey0sHSD value of 5.03, there is significant difference in mean number of explosions between Teaching as usual and Teaching+safety training methods.
partial − η2 =0.37
The percentage of variance of number of explosions explained by the IV is 37%