Question

In: Economics

GAME THEORY AND OLIGOPOLY. Profit payoff Matrix for Subways and Quiznos (Sandwich Style Resturants. Below is...

GAME THEORY AND OLIGOPOLY. Profit payoff Matrix for Subways and Quiznos (Sandwich Style Resturants. Below is the profit payoff matrix for these two restaurants depending on whether they set their Chicken sandwich price HIGH or LOW

            

TABLE 1

Quiznos LOW price

Quiznos HIGH price

Subway LOW price

$7 million for Subway

$7 million for Quiznos

$12 million for Subway

$5 million for Quiznos

Subway HIGH price

$5 million for Subway

$12 million for Quiznos

$9 million for Subway

$9 million for Quiznos

a) Using Table, what if any is the collusive outcome? Explain whether it will occur.

b) Using Table, what if any is the Nash equilibrium? Explain whether it will occur.

TABLE 2

Quiznos LOW price

Quiznos HIGH price

Subway LOW price

$7 million for Subway

$8 million for Quiznos

$12 million for Subway

$6 million for Quiznos

Subway HIGH price

$10 million for Subway

$12 million for Quiznos

$9 million for Subway

$9 million for Quiznos

c) What is meant by a dominant strategy? Using Table 2, is there a dominant strategy? Explain, and determine which outcome will occur?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a) There is a collusive outcome when both charge a HIGH price. This is because the collective payoff is greater at 9 million for both which is highest of all options (HIGH, HIGH). No this is not likely to take place since both players have a dominant strategy of charging LOW price. This is because their profits are higher (7 million vs 5 million and 12 million vs 9 million) when they charge a LOW price.

b) Both players have a dominant strategy of charging LOW price. This is because their profits are higher (7 million vs 5 million and 12 million vs 9 million) when they charge a LOW price. This is the Nash equilibrium (LOW, LOW). It will occur because players will act independently and select their dominant strategies

c) This is the best possible response of a player given all the choices and it remains unchanged when the rival changes his own response. Subway has no dominant strategy because it charges HIGH price when Quiznos charge a LOW price but charges a HIGH price when Quiznos charges a HIGH price. However Quiznos charges a LOW price for any strategy selected by Subway. Hence, Quiznos has a dominant strategy of LOW price.


Related Solutions

How would I create a game theory payoff matrix with a home buyer and a home...
How would I create a game theory payoff matrix with a home buyer and a home seller where the seller can accept, reject, or counteroffer and the home buyer can make an offer or make no offer? Any payoff in dollars is fine, just need to know how to figure this out.
Define game theory and apply the game theory matrix diagram to illustrate and explain a strategic...
Define game theory and apply the game theory matrix diagram to illustrate and explain a strategic decision you have made recently.
Mammoths payoffs (profit) are shown in the lower half of each cell in the payoff matrix...
Mammoths payoffs (profit) are shown in the lower half of each cell in the payoff matrix below. Is this a zero-, negative-, or positive-sum game? What is each airline’s profit if Mammoth discount and Colossal doesn’t? If the airlines cooperate, which strategy is each likely to choose? In the absence of cooperation, does each player have a dominant strategy? Explain. What effect would it have on each player’s likely strategy that the game is to be repeated many times? Mammoth...
Refer to the payoff matrix provided here. In this game between Delta Airlines and American Airlines,...
Refer to the payoff matrix provided here. In this game between Delta Airlines and American Airlines, what is the Nash equilibrium? Group of answer choices The Nash equilibrium occurs when both firms offer a discount. The Nash equilibrium occurs when Delta offers the discount, but American does not. The Nash equilibrium occurs when American offers the discount, but Delta does not. The Nash equilibrium occurs when both firms offer no discount.
The following is a payoff matrix showing profit in millions of dollars when two companies simultaneously...
The following is a payoff matrix showing profit in millions of dollars when two companies simultaneously decide on various advertising budgets ($1 million, $2 million, or $3 million): Blank for Formatting Pizza Hut Advertising Budget: $1 mill Pizza Hut Advertising Budget: $2 mill Pizza Hut Advertising Budget: $3 mill Papa John's Advertising Budget: $1 mill $225/$175 $215/$185 $210/$180 Papa John's Advertising Budget: $2 mill 235/165 210/170 205/175 Papa John's Advertising Budget: $3 mill 215/155 205/160 200/165 QUESTION: What would be...
Discuss and explain with examples what the three theories of oligopoly and the game theory are?
Discuss and explain with examples what the three theories of oligopoly and the game theory are?
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player 2...
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. Player 2 Strategy X Y Player 1 A 5, 5 0, -200 B -200, 0 20, 20 a. Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication. Instructions: You may select more than one answer. Click the box with a check mark for the correct answers and click twice to empty the box for the wrong answers....
The following payoff matrix represents a single-period, simultaneous move game to be played by two firms....
The following payoff matrix represents a single-period, simultaneous move game to be played by two firms. Show all the best responses for each player by placing checkmarks next to each payoff that reflects a best response choice. Does Firm A have a dominant strategy and if so, what is it? Does Firm B have a dominant strategy and if so, what is it? Does a Nash Equilibrium (or multiple NE) exist for this game and if so, what is it...
The payoff matrix for a game is 4 −1 5 −6 2 1 1 −4 2...
The payoff matrix for a game is 4 −1 5 −6 2 1 1 −4 2 . (a) Find the expected payoff to the row player if the row player R uses the maximin pure strategy and the column C player uses the minimax pure strategy. (b) Find the expected payoff to the row player if R uses the maximin strategy 40% of the time and chooses each of the other two rows 30% of the time while C uses...
For a two-person zero-sum game between X and Y, the payoff matrix for X is: Y1...
For a two-person zero-sum game between X and Y, the payoff matrix for X is: Y1 Y2 Y3 X1 1 4 2 X2 4 1 2 Formulate the linear program for finding the best mixed strategy for X that maximizes its minimum expected pay off, EP, with p1 and p2 bein the respective probabilities for playing strategies X1 and X2.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT