In: Economics
The following payoff matrix represents a single-period, simultaneous move game to be played by two firms. Show all the best responses for each player by placing checkmarks next to each payoff that reflects a best response choice. Does Firm A have a dominant strategy and if so, what is it? Does Firm B have a dominant strategy and if so, what is it? Does a Nash Equilibrium (or multiple NE) exist for this game and if so, what is it (or are they)?
Firm A |
Firm B |
|||
Advertise Heavily |
Advertise Lightly |
Do not Advertise |
||
Advertise Heavily |
75, 125 |
85, 150 |
200, 100 |
|
Advertise Lightly |
100, 175 |
75, 200 |
300, 150 |
|
Do not Advertise |
150, 300 |
25, 400 |
200, 375 |
Dominant strategies are considered as better than other strategies, no matter what other players might do as these strategies gives the player higher payoff irrespective of what the other player chooses.
Firm A does not have any dominant strategy as no single strategy always gives firm A always a better payoff irrespective of what firm B chooses
Firm B does not have any dominant strategy which is to advertise lightly. This is because irrespective of what Firn A chooses the payoff of firm B is maximized when Firm B chooses to advertise lighlty it can be seen from bullet points 4, 5, 6
The following stars show the best responses.
advertises heavily=AH
do not advertise=NA
Advertise lightly=AL
Checking for nash equilibrium
Note that 4 and 2 are mutual best responses and therefore, there exists a single nash equilibrium (Advertise heavily,Advertise lightly).
If firm B chooses AL then the best response of firm A is AH and if firm A chooses to AH the best response of Firm B is to AL. Therefore, it is a mutual best response.