Question

In: Operations Management

A company currently using an inspection process in its material receiving department is trying to install...

A company currently using an inspection process in its material receiving department is trying to install an overall cost reduction program. One possible reduction is the elimination of one inspection position. This position tests items for which the probability of a material defect averages 0.01. By inspecting all items, the inspector is able to remove all defects. The inspector can inspect 50 units per hour. The hourly rate including fringe benefits for this position is $10. If the inspection position is eliminated, defects will go into product assembly and will have to be replaced later at a cost of $11 each when they are detected in final product testing.

Assume that the line will operate at the same rate (i.e., the inspection rate) if the inspection operation was eliminated.

a-1. If the inspector position is eliminated, what will the hourly cost of defects be? (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

Cost per hour            $

a-2. Should this inspection position be eliminated based on costs alone?

Yes
No

b. What is the cost to inspect each unit? (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

Cost per unit            $

c. Is there benefit (or loss) from the current inspection process? How much? (Input all amounts as positive values. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)

Hourly Per unit
(Click to select)LossBenefit $ $

Solutions

Expert Solution

Probability of a material defect = 0.01

Rate of inspection = 50 units / hour

Hourly cost of inspection = $10

Penalty cost for defect at final product testing = $11

Ans a1)

Number of units tested per hour = 50

Average number of defective material used for production per hour = Probability of defect *  Number of units tested per hour

= 0.01 * 50

= 0.50

Average hourly cost of defects = Average number of defective material used for production per hour * Penalty cost for defect at final product testing

= 0.5 * 11

= $5.50

Ans a2)

Average hourly cost of defects without inspection = $5.50

Hourly costs of inspection = $10

Yes, it would thus be advisable to remove the inspection position as it reduces the overall cost of the production line from $10 to $5.50

Ans b)

Cost to inspect each unit = Hourly cost of inspection / Number of units inspected per hour

= 10 / 50

= $0.20

Ans c)

Hourly cost of current inspection = $10

Hourly cost without inspection = $ 5.5

Hourly loss from the current inspection process = $10 - $5.5 = $4.5

Cost per unit without inspection = Average hourly cost of defects / Number of units inspected per hour

= 5.5 / 50

= $0.11

Loss per unit from the current inspection process = Cost to inspect each unit - Cost per unit without inspection

= $0.20 - $0.11

= $0.09


Related Solutions

ZETA Ltd is a manufacturing company that uses material QUEE in its manufacturing process. On an...
ZETA Ltd is a manufacturing company that uses material QUEE in its manufacturing process. On an annual basis, ZETA Ltd uses 127,690 units of material QUEE in production. The material is bought form a wide range of suppliers at an average price of K38 per unit. Because supply for material QUEE is uncertain, ZETA Ltd maintains safety inventory that is sufficient to satisfy usage for 12 days. The material is consumed at an even rate and the cost of placing...
Company X is trying to estimate future inspection fees based on prior experience. You (the accountant)...
Company X is trying to estimate future inspection fees based on prior experience. You (the accountant) requested and gathered from various managers the number of orders received each week, the average weight of each order, and the average cost of each order. You then compared this data to the actual inspection fees incurred. The data is summarized below: Week Inspection Fees # orders received Size of order (lbs) Cost of order Week 1 $57,600 219,379 889,114 $25,847 Week 2 $36,500...
Corona Ltd. provides the costs for its single product using process costing. Direct material is added...
Corona Ltd. provides the costs for its single product using process costing. Direct material is added at the beginning of the production process, and conversion activity occurs uniformly throughout the process. Percent Complete Physical units Materials Conversion Work in process, August 1 30,000 40% 80% Units started during August 80,000 Units completed and transferred out during August 90,000 Work in process, August 31 20,000 50% 30% Total DirectMaterials Conversion Work in process, August 1 $328,000 $200,000 $128,000 Costs incurred during...
The Bangles Company uses the average method of process costing in its only department. The company...
The Bangles Company uses the average method of process costing in its only department. The company began operations in March. The company produces bangles and each bangle requires both Material A (added at the beginning of processing) and Material B (added at the 30% point in processing). All spoilage is detected at the 100% point in processing. During March, the company started 20,000 units and completed 16,000 units. The ending Work in Process for March was 80% done with respect...
Suppose a company can replace the packing material it currently uses with a biodegradable packing material....
Suppose a company can replace the packing material it currently uses with a biodegradable packing material. The company believes this move to biodegradable packing materials will be well-received by the general public. However, the biodegradable packing materials are more expensive than the current packing materials and the contribution margin ratios of the related products will drop. What are the arguments for the company to use the biodegradable packing materials? What are the arguments for the company to not use the...
   Crystal Company adds materials at the beginning of the process in its Cutting Department. Additional information...
   Crystal Company adds materials at the beginning of the process in its Cutting Department. Additional information relating to Crystal is as follows: % Complete        Units Beginning work-in-process 60% 10,000 Completed and transferred 100% 14,000 Ending work-in-process 40% 4,000                  Costs                   Materials     Conversion Beginning work-in-process $ 8,000 $15,000 Cost added this period 10,000 16,200 Using the weighted-average method, what was the total cost per equivalent unit A. $2.00 B. $3.00 C. $3.25 D. $3.50
    Sal Company uses process costing system in its production. The material costs were 80% complete...
    Sal Company uses process costing system in its production. The material costs were 80% complete and 55% conversion costs complete with respect to the 8,000 units in work in process at August 1. Additional 20,000 units were started during the month of August. During August, 18,000 units were completed and transferred to the next department. The material costs were 40% complete and 70% conversion costs complete with respect to the ending work in process at August 31. An analysis...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 14,000 24% 79% work in process, June 30 18,000 65% 41% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 36,804 $ 24,660...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT