In: Statistics and Probability
Luke Corporation produces a variety of products, each within their own division. Last year, the managers at Luke developed and began marketing a new chewing gum, Bubbs, to sell in vending machines. The product, which sells for $5.25 per case, has not had the market success that managers expected, and the company is considering dropping Bubs.
The product-line income statement for the past 12 months follows:
Table 1
Revenue |
$14,682,150 |
|
Costs |
||
Manufacturing costs |
$14,440,395 |
|
Allocated corporate costs |
734,108 |
15,174,503 |
Product-line margin |
$ (492,353) |
|
Allowance for tax (@20%) |
98,470 |
|
Product-line profit (loss) |
$ (393,883) |
All products at Luke receive an allocation of corporate overhead costs, which is computed as 5 percent of product revenue. The 5 percent rate is computed based on the most recent year's corporate cost as a percentage of revenue. Data on corporate costs and revenues for the past two years follow:
Table 2
Corporate Revenue |
Corporate Overhead Costs |
|
Most recent year |
$106,750,000 |
$5,337,500 |
Previous year |
$76,200,000 |
$4,221,000 |
Assume the fixed corporate overhead is $1,454,000 in each year. None of these fixed costs are specifically traceable to Bubbs.
Roy O. Andre, the product manager for Bubbs, is concerned about whether the product will be dropped by the company and has employed you as a financial consultant to help with some analysis. In addition to the information given above, Mr. Andre provides you with the following data on product costs for Bubs:
Table 3
Monthly Production and Production Costs |
||
Month |
Cases |
Prod. Costs |
1 |
207,000 |
1,139,828 |
2 |
217,200 |
1,161,328 |
3 |
214,800 |
1,169,981 |
4 |
228,000 |
1,185,523 |
5 |
224,400 |
1,187,827 |
6 |
237,000 |
1,208,673 |
7 |
220,200 |
1,183,699 |
8 |
247,200 |
1,226,774 |
9 |
238,800 |
1,225,226 |
10 |
252,600 |
1,287,325 |
11 |
250,200 |
1,241,760 |
12 |
259,200 |
1,272,451 |
Table 4 - Regression Analysis of Table 3 Data
Adjusted R-squared 0.957
Variable |
Coefficient |
t |
p>|t| |
Significance |
Std Err |
Units |
2.236 |
15.71 |
< .001 |
*** |
0.1423 |
Constant |
682,300 |
20.53 |
<.001 |
*** |
33,246 |
QUESTION: Assume the variable allocated corporate costs are $0.192 per case of Bubbs. Given methods used to compile Table 1, what would the price per case of Bubbs have to be for the product line margin to break-even. Assume no change in the number of units sold. You should apply allocated corporate overhead at the rate used by Lukes. Round to the nearest 0.001 per case.
SUMMARY OUTPUT
REGRESSION STATISTICS
MULTIPLE R 0.980345319
R SQUARE 0.961076945
ADJUSTED R SQUARE 0.957184639
STANDARD ERROR 7969.964262
OBSERVATIONS 12
ANNOVA
df ss MS F Significance F
Regression 1 15684258323 1.5684E+10 246.9171 2.23512E-08
Residual 10 635203303.4 63520330.3
Total 11 16319461626
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value lower 95% upper 95%
intercept 682293.6573 33240.33583 20.5260759 1.66E-09 608229.5739 756357.7406
cases 2.235883256 0.142289713 15.7135973 2.24E-08 1.918842019 2.552924493
a. $ 2.24 per case
Relevant cost = variable cost production cost (X varaible coefficient in regresion summary output)
The estimated variable production cost is $ 2.24.this is the minimum that can be charged without reducing profit.
b.
To break even on the product ,Luke has to sell a sufficient number of cases to show or to cover fixed production costs on the product. The contribution margin, is lowered by the variable portion of the corporate costs. To determine these, we use high low method,only have two observations.
corporate costs are supposed to variable with respect to revenue, so using information on corporate costs varaible cost are 3.65% of revenue.
varaiable cost= cost at highest activity-cost at lowest activity/highest activity-lowest activity
= $ 5337500-4221000/$ 106750000-76200000
= 3.65 % of revenue
let q be the number of cases sold. Then, profit for q cases is -
Profit= Revenue -varaible corporate costs-fixed production cost
=(5.25*q)-(2.24*q)-(3.65%*5.25*q)- $ 682294
= $ 2.818*q
= $ 682294
q= 242120 cases
c.
This problem different from requirements (c) ,becuase the requirements that the revenue from the product covers th e production costs and the full 5% corporate cost allocation make the corporate cost allocation properly variable.
so, cases provide a profit equal to 5% of revenue
=5%*5.25*q
profit= revenue-varaible production costs-varaible corporate costs-fixed prouction costs
= 5.25*q-2.24*q-5%*5.25*q-682294
(5% *5.25*q)= 5.25 *q -2.24*q-5%*2.25*q-682294
q=274565 cases
d.
fixed manufacturing costs can be avoided. Luke will protect all the production cost plus the varaible corporate overhead.
lost revenue $(14682150)
production cost avoided 14440395
loss before corporate overhead savings (241755)
corporate costs avoided 3.65*14682150 535898
incraese profits before tax 294143
tax 20% 58829
incraesed profits $ 235314
d. $ 235314 increase
THANKS.... ASK YOUR QUERY IN COMMENT BOX...