In: Advanced Math
Let G be a bipartite graph with 107 left vertices and 20 right vertices. Two vertices u, v are called twins if the set of neighbors of u equals the set of neighbors of v (triplets, quadruplets etc are defined similarly).
Show that G has twins.
Bonus: Show that G has triplets. What about quadruplets, etc.?
Suppose that there are
elements on the left
and
elements on the right. Then the way we can make a graph such that
there are no twins is by using the following algorithm:
vertices on the left
and join it to the right
vertices in a one on
one manner. Notice that we are not supposed to keep any vertex
empty hence this follows.
pairs
from the vertices in the right, and hence select the next
vertices
from the left and join them to each separate pair. Then do the same
for the next
points
in the left, joining them to separate triplets on the right and so
on.
point in the left and join it to all the points in the right. This
is the twins saturation point. Any other point in the left will now
be either empty or be connected to 1 point or 2 points or... or all
points, and hence will inevitably share it's set of neighbours with
someone else.The condition for twins saturation is
. Thus for a twin to occur, the condiition has to be that there
exists more points beyond the twins saturation point, which,
mathematically means
.
Now, given is
and
. We
see that
and hence this graph cannot have a twin. If there's no twins, then
there is no case of any triplet, quadruplet etc.
But note that if
and
, then
and hence there exists at least 1 twin.
For the case of triplets, note that we can use the exact same
algorithm as above to avoid making a graph with triplets. First we
reach the twins saturation point, and then forget that we ever did
anything and start using the algorithm again till we again reach a
twin saturation point. Note that this would create lots of twins
(
to be
exact), but no triplets. This is the triplet saturation point. Any
point beyond this will create a triplet. Thus the necessary number
of points till the triplet saturation point is
and the condition for no triplet is
. Thus to have a triplet, we necessarily require
.
We note that for
and
,
and hence there exists at least 1 triplet.
Going by the same argument, we see that for an
-tuplet to exist, the
necessary condition is
.
We note that for
and
,
but
and hence there exists quadruplets, quintuplets but no sextuplets
or further.