Question

In: Operations Management

The Pandora Company, a U.S.-based manufacturer of furniture and appliances that offshores all of its manufacturing...

The Pandora Company, a U.S.-based manufacturer of furniture and appliances that offshores all of
its manufacturing operations to Asia, has distribution centers at various locations on the East Coast
near ports where their items are imported on container ships. In many cases, their appliances and
furniture arrive partially assembled, and they complete the assembly at their distribution centers
before sending the finished products to retailers. For example, appliance motors, electric controls,
housings, and furniture pieces might arrive from different Asian manufacturers in separate
containers. Recently, the company began exporting its products to various locations in Europe,
and demand steadily increased. As a result, the company determined that shipping items to the
United States, assembling the products, and then turning around and shipping them to Europe was
inefficient and not cost- effective. The company now plans to open three new distribution centers
near ports in Europe, so that it will ship the items from Asian ports to its distribution centers at the
European ports, offload some of the items for final product assembly, and then ship the partially
filled containers on to its U.S. distribution centers. The table 1.1 shows the seven possible
distribution center locations near container ports in Europe and their container capacities; the
container shipments from each of its Asian ports; and the container shipping cost from each of its
Asian ports to each possible distribution center location. The table 1.2 shows the demand from
each of the U.S. ports and the cost for container shipments from each of the possible distribution
center locations to each of the U.S. ports.
Determine the three distribution center locations in Europe that Pandora should select, and the
shipments from each of the Asian ports to these selected distribution centers, and from the
European distribution centers to the U.S. ports that will result in the lowest overall cost for the 1st
year of operations. You are expected to show a) the minimizinga) the minimizing equation, b) all the supply, demand
and any other required constraint equations and c) the minimum overall costs. You are also
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
36.7 9.1 48.3 9.3
38.5 6.2 43.5 6.2
35.1 9.0 52.6 10.0
24.5 5.7 54.2 8.7
27.9 6.2 38.5 5.1
31.4 4.8 28.9 4.4
29.4 5.1 26.4 5.2
25.5 6.0 39.4 6.0
52.3 10.8 44.3 8.4
35.2 7.5 46.3 7.9
Page 5 of 8
expected to show the tables that you have developed in Excel in order to use the Solver Add-In to
compute the solution to the problem.
Table 1.1 (Costs, Capacity and Supply)
Table 1.2 (Costs and Demand)
…….............. END ………………
Proposed Distribution Center
Costs Rotterdam (k) Hamburg (l)Antwerp (m) Bremen (n) Valencia (o) Lisbon (p) Le Havre (q) Supply
Center Cost 16,725,000 19,351,000 13,766,000 15,463,000 12,542,000 13,811,000 22,365,000
Asian Ports
Hong Kong (a) 3,466 3,560 3,125 3,345 3,060 3,120 3,658 235
Shanghai (b) 3,190 3,020 3,278 3,269 2,987 2,864 3,725 170
Busan (c) 2,815 2,700 2,890 3,005 2,465 2,321 3,145 165
Mumbai (d) 2,412 2,560 2,515 2,875 2,325 2,133 2,758 325
Kaoshiung (e) 2,600 2,800 2,735 2,755 2,473 2,410 2,925 405
Capacity 565 485 520 490 310 410 605
Proposed US Port
Dist. Cent New York (u) Savannah (v) Miami (w)N Orleans (x)
Rotterdam (k) 2,045 1,875 1,675 2,320
Hamburg (l) 2,875 2,130 1,856 2,415
Antwerp (m) 2,415 2,056 1,956 2,228
Bremen (n) 2,225 1,875 2,075 2,652
Valencia (o) 1,865 1,725 1,548 1,815
Lisbon (p) 1,750 1,555 1,420 1,475
Le Harve (q) 3,056 2,280 2,065 2,425
Demand 440 305 190 365a) the minimizing equation, b) all the supply, demand
and any other required constraint equations and c) the minimum overall costs. You are also
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
36.7 9.1 48.3 9.3
38.5 6.2 43.5 6.2
35.1 9.0 52.6 10.0
24.5 5.7 54.2 8.7
27.9 6.2 38.5 5.1
31.4 4.8 28.9 4.4
29.4 5.1 26.4 5.2
25.5 6.0 39.4 6.0
52.3 10.8 44.3 8.4
35.2 7.5 46.3 7.9
Page 5 of 8
expected to show the tables that you have developed in Excel in order to use the Solver Add-In to
compute the solution to the problem.
Table 1.1 (Costs, Capacity and Supply)
Table 1.2 (Costs and Demand)
…….............. END ………………
Proposed Distribution Center
Costs Rotterdam (k) Hamburg (l)Antwerp (m) Bremen (n) Valencia (o) Lisbon (p) Le Havre (q) Supply
Center Cost 16,725,000 19,351,000 13,766,000 15,463,000 12,542,000 13,811,000 22,365,000
Asian Ports
Hong Kong (a) 3,466 3,560 3,125 3,345 3,060 3,120 3,658 235
Shanghai (b) 3,190 3,020 3,278 3,269 2,987 2,864 3,725 170
Busan (c) 2,815 2,700 2,890 3,005 2,465 2,321 3,145 165
Mumbai (d) 2,412 2,560 2,515 2,875 2,325 2,133 2,758 325
Kaoshiung (e) 2,600 2,800 2,735 2,755 2,473 2,410 2,925 405
Capacity 565 485 520 490 310 410 605
Proposed US Port
Dist. Cent New York (u) Savannah (v) Miami (w)N Orleans (x)
Rotterdam (k) 2,045 1,875 1,675 2,320
Hamburg (l) 2,875 2,130 1,856 2,415
Antwerp (m) 2,415 2,056 1,956 2,228
Bremen (n) 2,225 1,875 2,075 2,652
Valencia (o) 1,865 1,725 1,548 1,815
Lisbon (p) 1,750 1,555 1,420 1,475
Le Harve (q) 3,056 2,280 2,065 2,425
Demand 440 305 190 365a) the minimizing equation, b) all the supply, demand
and any other required constraint equations and c) the minimum overall costs. You are also
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
36.7 9.1 48.3 9.3
38.5 6.2 43.5 6.2
35.1 9.0 52.6 10.0
24.5 5.7 54.2 8.7
27.9 6.2 38.5 5.1
31.4 4.8 28.9 4.4
29.4 5.1 26.4 5.2
25.5 6.0 39.4 6.0
52.3 10.8 44.3 8.4
35.2 7.5 46.3 7.9
Page 5 of 8
expected to show the tables that you have developed in Excel in order to use the Solver Add-In to
compute the solution to the problem.
Table 1.1 (Costs, Capacity and Supply)
Table 1.2 (Costs and Demand)
…….............. END ………………
Proposed Distribution Center
Costs Rotterdam (k) Hamburg (l)Antwerp (m) Bremen (n) Valencia (o) Lisbon (p) Le Havre (q) Supply
Center Cost 16,725,000 19,351,000 13,766,000 15,463,000 12,542,000 13,811,000 22,365,000
Asian Ports
Hong Kong (a) 3,466 3,560 3,125 3,345 3,060 3,120 3,658 235
Shanghai (b) 3,190 3,020 3,278 3,269 2,987 2,864 3,725 170
Busan (c) 2,815 2,700 2,890 3,005 2,465 2,321 3,145 165
Mumbai (d) 2,412 2,560 2,515 2,875 2,325 2,133 2,758 325
Kaoshiung (e) 2,600 2,800 2,735 2,755 2,473 2,410 2,925 405
Capacity 565 485 520 490 310 410 605
Proposed US Port
Dist. Cent New York (u) Savannah (v) Miami (w)N Orleans (x)
Rotterdam (k) 2,045 1,875 1,675 2,320
Hamburg (l) 2,875 2,130 1,856 2,415
Antwerp (m) 2,415 2,056 1,956 2,228
Bremen (n) 2,225 1,875 2,075 2,652
Valencia (o) 1,865 1,725 1,548 1,815
Lisbon (p) 1,750 1,555 1,420 1,475
Le Harve (q) 3,056 2,280 2,065 2,425
Demand 440 305 190 365a) the minimizing equation, b) all the supply, demand
and any other required constraint equations and c) the minimum overall costs. You are also
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
36.7 9.1 48.3 9.3
38.5 6.2 43.5 6.2
35.1 9.0 52.6 10.0
24.5 5.7 54.2 8.7
27.9 6.2 38.5 5.1
31.4 4.8 28.9 4.4
29.4 5.1 26.4 5.2
25.5 6.0 39.4 6.0
52.3 10.8 44.3 8.4
35.2 7.5 46.3 7.9
Page 5 of 8
expected to show the tables that you have developed in Excel in order to use the Solver Add-In to
compute the solution to the problem.
Table 1.1 (Costs, Capacity and Supply)
Table 1.2 (Costs and Demand)
…….............. END ………………
Proposed Distribution Center
Costs Rotterdam (k) Hamburg (l)Antwerp (m) Bremen (n) Valencia (o) Lisbon (p) Le Havre (q) Supply
Center Cost 16,725,000 19,351,000 13,766,000 15,463,000 12,542,000 13,811,000 22,365,000
Asian Ports
Hong Kong (a) 3,466 3,560 3,125 3,345 3,060 3,120 3,658 235
Shanghai (b) 3,190 3,020 3,278 3,269 2,987 2,864 3,725 170
Busan (c) 2,815 2,700 2,890 3,005 2,465 2,321 3,145 165
Mumbai (d) 2,412 2,560 2,515 2,875 2,325 2,133 2,758 325
Kaoshiung (e) 2,600 2,800 2,735 2,755 2,473 2,410 2,925 405
Capacity 565 485 520 490 310 410 605
Proposed US Port
Dist. Cent New York (u) Savannah (v) Miami (w)N Orleans (x)
Rotterdam (k) 2,045 1,875 1,675 2,320
Hamburg (l) 2,875 2,130 1,856 2,415
Antwerp (m) 2,415 2,056 1,956 2,228
Bremen (n) 2,225 1,875 2,075 2,652
Valencia (o) 1,865 1,725 1,548 1,815
Lisbon (p) 1,750 1,555 1,420 1,475
Le Harve (q) 3,056 2,280 2,065 2,425
Demand 440 305 190 365a) the minimizing equation, b) all the supply, demand
and any other required constraint equations and c) the minimum overall costs. You are also
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
Hits
(1,000s)
Orders
(1,000s)
36.7 9.1 48.3 9.3
38.5 6.2 43.5 6.2
35.1 9.0 52.6 10.0
24.5 5.7 54.2 8.7
27.9 6.2 38.5 5.1
31.4 4.8 28.9 4.4
29.4 5.1 26.4 5.2
25.5 6.0 39.4 6.0
52.3 10.8 44.3 8.4
35.2 7.5 46.3 7.9
Page 5 of 8
expected to show the tables that you have developed in Excel in order to use the Solver Add-In to
compute the solution to the problem.
Table 1.1 (Costs, Capacity and Supply)
Table 1.2 (Costs and Demand)
…….............. END ………………
Proposed Distribution Center
Costs Rotterdam (k) Hamburg (l)Antwerp (m) Bremen (n) Valencia (o) Lisbon (p) Le Havre (q) Supply
Center Cost 16,725,000 19,351,000 13,766,000 15,463,000 12,542,000 13,811,000 22,365,000
Asian Ports
Hong Kong (a) 3,466 3,560 3,125 3,345 3,060 3,120 3,658 235
Shanghai (b) 3,190 3,020 3,278 3,269 2,987 2,864 3,725 170
Busan (c) 2,815 2,700 2,890 3,005 2,465 2,321 3,145 165
Mumbai (d) 2,412 2,560 2,515 2,875 2,325 2,133 2,758 325
Kaoshiung (e) 2,600 2,800 2,735 2,755 2,473 2,410 2,925 405
Capacity 565 485 520 490 310 410 605
Proposed US Port
Dist. Cent New York (u) Savannah (v) Miami (w)N Orleans (x)
Rotterdam (k) 2,045 1,875 1,675 2,320
Hamburg (l) 2,875 2,130 1,856 2,415
Antwerp (m) 2,415 2,056 1,956 2,228
Bremen (n) 2,225 1,875 2,075 2,652
Valencia (o) 1,865 1,725 1,548 1,815
Lisbon (p) 1,750 1,555 1,420 1,475
Le Harve (q) 3,056 2,280 2,065 2,425
Demand 440 305 190 365

Solutions

Expert Solution

Below is the screenshot of the formula applied -

Below is the screenshot of the solver -

Below is the result obtained -

I, J and K should be chosen.

Total Cost = 45363770

Note:  Please like the answer, if it is helpful to you. Please mention the reason in the comment section, before disliking. Thank You.......!


Related Solutions

Your company, a manufacturer (primarily major kitchen appliances) based in the United States, has decided to...
Your company, a manufacturer (primarily major kitchen appliances) based in the United States, has decided to pursue international expansion opportunities in sub-Saharan Africa. In order to achieve some economies of scale, your strategy is to minimize local adaptation. Focusing on a comparison of two sub-Saharan African countries of your choice, prepare an executive summary that features aspects of the product where stabilization will simply not be possible and adaptation to local conditions will be essential.
1. Oering's Furniture Corporation is a Virginia-based manufacturer of furniture. In a recent year, it reported...
1. Oering's Furniture Corporation is a Virginia-based manufacturer of furniture. In a recent year, it reported the following activities:    Net income $ 5,155 Purchase of property, plant, and equipment 2,087 Borrowings under line of credit (bank) 1,123 Proceeds from issuance of stock 21 Cash received from customers 37,164 Payments to reduce long-term debt 54 Sale of marketable securities 221 Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 6,877 Dividends paid 292 Interest paid 108 Purchase of treasury stock (stock repurchase)...
Fab Furniture has two manufacturing departments--Cutting and Finishing. It considers all of its manufacturing overhead costs...
Fab Furniture has two manufacturing departments--Cutting and Finishing. It considers all of its manufacturing overhead costs to be fixed costs. The overhead estimates for the year and for one job (Order #75675) completed during the year are shown below. Estimated Data Cutting Finishing Total Manufacturing overhead costs $ 6,210,000 $ 6,750,000 $ 12,960,000 Direct labor-hours 135,000 81,000 216,000 Machine-hours 54,000 270,000 324,000 Order # 75675 Cutting Finishing Total Direct labor-hours 28 20 48 Machine-hours 20 23 43 Required: 1. Calculate...
Mf Limited, a bespoke furniture manufacturing entity based in South Africa, is looking to diversify its...
Mf Limited, a bespoke furniture manufacturing entity based in South Africa, is looking to diversify its market by entering the European and American markets. In order to gain a foothold in the new markets, Mf Limited can either produce the furniture in South Africa and export it, or acquire existing businesses in Europe and America. In order to decide between these two options, the company engaged an international consultancy firm at a cost of R800 000. Research by the consultancy...
Departmental Income Statement Perkins Appliance & Furniture Company has two departments, appliances and furniture. Operating information...
Departmental Income Statement Perkins Appliance & Furniture Company has two departments, appliances and furniture. Operating information for 2016 appears below. Alliance Department Furniture Department Inventory, January 1, 2016 $146,000 $116,000 Inventory, December 31, 2016 49,600 22,000 Net sales 1,120,000 760,000 Purchases 640,000 480,000 Purchases discounts 8,000 6,000 Transporation in 18,000 16,000 Traceable departmental expenses 179,600 62,000 Common operating expenses of the firm were $180,000. a. Prepare a departmental income statement showing departmental contribution to common expenses and net income of...
Mf  Limited, a bespoke furniture manufacturing entity based in South Africa, is looking to diversify its market...
Mf  Limited, a bespoke furniture manufacturing entity based in South Africa, is looking to diversify its market by entering the European and American markets. In order to gain a foothold in the new markets, Mf Limited can either produce the furniture in South Africa and export it, or acquire existing businesses in Europe and America. In order to decide between these two options, the company engaged an international consultancy firm at a cost of R800 000. Research by the consultancy firm...
A manufacturer of small appliances employs a market research firm to look into sales of its...
A manufacturer of small appliances employs a market research firm to look into sales of its products. Shown below are last month's sales of electric can openers from a random sample of 50 stores. The manufacturer would like to know if there is convincing evidence in these data that the mean can opener sales for all stores last month was more than 22. Sales 19 19 16 19 25 26 24 63 22 16 13 26 34 10 48 16...
Bobcat Company.  Bobcat​ Company, U.S.-based manufacturer of industrial​ equipment, just purchased a Korean company that produces...
Bobcat Company.  Bobcat​ Company, U.S.-based manufacturer of industrial​ equipment, just purchased a Korean company that produces plastic nuts and bolts for heavy equipment. The purchase price was Won7,900 million.​ Won1,000 million has already been​ paid, and the remaining Won6,900 million is due in six months. The current spot rate is Won1,103​/$, and the​ 6-month forward rate is Won1,163​/$. The​ 6-month Korean won interest rate is 17​% per​ annum, the​ 6-month U.S. dollar rate is 4.5​% per annum. Bobcat can invest...
Bobcat Company.  Bobcat​ Company, U.S.-based manufacturer of industrial​ equipment, just purchased a Korean company that produces...
Bobcat Company.  Bobcat​ Company, U.S.-based manufacturer of industrial​ equipment, just purchased a Korean company that produces plastic nuts and bolts for heavy equipment. The purchase price was Won 7,800 million.​ Won1,000 million has already been​paid, and the remaining Won 6,800 million is due in six months. The current spot rate is Won 1,105​/$, and the​ 6-month forward rate is Won1,106​/$. The​ 6-month Korean won interest rate is 16.5​% per​annum, the​ 6-month U.S. dollar rate is 3% per annum. Bobcat can...
Bobcat Company. Bobcat Company, U.S.-based manufacturer of industrial equipment, just purchased a Korean company that produces...
Bobcat Company. Bobcat Company, U.S.-based manufacturer of industrial equipment, just purchased a Korean company that produces plastic nuts and bolts for heavy equipment. The purchase price was Won 7,800 million. Won 1,000 million has already been paid, and the remaining Won 6,800 million is due in six months. The current spot rate is Won 1,113 /$, and the 6-month forward rate is Won1,162 /$. The 6-month Korean won interest rate is 16 % per annum, the 6-month U.S. dollar rate...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT