Question

In: Economics

Question on Rubinstein Bargaining in Game Theory Suppose players alternate in making offers until offer T...

Question on Rubinstein Bargaining in Game Theory

Suppose players alternate in making offers until offer T ∈ N (N are Natural Numbers) is rejected, at which point the game ends with payoffs (0,0). Find the unique Subgame Perfect Equilibrium payoffs. Do they converge as T → ∞?

Solutions

Expert Solution

T is replaced with K here. In the final assignment, please replace time period K with T.

Consider the following finite horizon bargaining game.

Two players i = 1, 2 are trying to allocate $1 between them.

The game lasts for K < ∞ periods. Periods are counted backward, so the game starts in period K and ends in period 1. In an odd period k, player 1 makes an offer x1 ∈ [0, 1], player 2 rejects the offer. The game continues to the period k −1. In any even period k, player 2 makes an offer x2 ∈ [0, 1], player 1 rejects the offer. Otherwise the game continues to period k − 2. If the offer is rejected in period 1, then both players receive 0 payoff. Player i’s discount factor is δi ∈ (0, 1).

Suppose that K = 2.

Applying backward induction. In period 1, every strictly positive offer is accepted by player 2. Hence the equilibrium offer must be 0, which must be accepted by player 2. In period 2, player 1 accepts any offer strictly larger than δ1 and rejects any offer strictly smaller than δ1. Hence the equilibrium offer must be exactly δ1, which must be accepted by player 1. Hence the SPE is unique. Player 1: offer 0 in period 1, accept x2 if and only if x2 ≥ δ1 in period 2. Player 2: offer δ1 in period 2, accept any offer in period 1. There are many other NE.

Suppose that K = 3.

Again applying BI.

In period 1, every strictly positive offer is accepted by player 2. Hence the equilibrium offer must be 0, which must be accepted by player 2.

In period 2, player 1 accepts an offer if and only if the offer is larger than or equal to δ1. Player 2 always offers δ1.

In period 3, player 2 accepts an offer if and only if the offer is larger than or equal to δ2(1 − δ1). Player 1 offers δ2(1 − δ1).

This is the Subgame Perfect Equilibrium payoffs which converges as K→ ∞


Related Solutions

Question 02: Game theory is the study of multi- player decision making in situation where the...
Question 02: Game theory is the study of multi- player decision making in situation where the choices of each player may affect the pay-offs received by other players. Arrange how many types you can categorized Game Theory. ( 10 Marks) . Note: Plagiarism is strictly prohibited please do not copy paste from internet
In the sequential bargaining game with ∞ <T rounds where player 1 is the first proposer...
In the sequential bargaining game with ∞ <T rounds where player 1 is the first proposer and if the player 2 rejects the offer, the game goes to the second round where they switch roles (the payoff is (s, 1-s) if responder accepts the offer) how do I find the followings? 1. A Nash Equilibrium that is not a SPE. 2. Nash Equilibrium which is different from the first question and which offers the highest possible payoff to the second...
Consider the Stage Game below, and consider the repeated game where players play twice (T =...
Consider the Stage Game below, and consider the repeated game where players play twice (T = 2). Payoffs for each agent are simply period one plus period two payoffs. L C R T 6,6 0,7 1,2 M 7,0 1,1 2,0 B 2,1 0,1 3,3 (a) Do any strategies dominate any other? (b) What are the two NE of the Stage Game? What is the difference between the two? (c) Call the TL strategy profile (1 plays T, 2 plays L)...
Two players (player A and player B) are playing a game against each other repeatedly until...
Two players (player A and player B) are playing a game against each other repeatedly until one is bankrupt. When a player wins a game they take $1 from the other player. All plays of the game are independent and identical. Suppose player A starts with $6 and player B starts with $6. If player A wins a game with probability 0.5, what is the probability the game ends (someone loses all their money) on exactly the 10th play of...
Suppose a casino offers a game that costs $20 to play. The game works as follows:...
Suppose a casino offers a game that costs $20 to play. The game works as follows: the dealer will give you a hand (randomly chosen from a regular 52 card deck) of four cards, and you will then win 10X dollars, where X is the number of aces in your hand. What are the expected winnings for this game? The expected profit? Is this a fair game?
How can we use game theory to improve strategic decision-making? How can we use game theory...
How can we use game theory to improve strategic decision-making? How can we use game theory in the construction and/or design of a strategy?
Using game theory, illustrate why it is difficult to finance public goods. Discuss the players, the...
Using game theory, illustrate why it is difficult to finance public goods. Discuss the players, the strategies, and the payoff matrix. How might one solve the problem of financing public goods? Provide examples.
Using game theory, illustrate why it is difficult to finance public goods. Discuss the players, the...
Using game theory, illustrate why it is difficult to finance public goods. Discuss the players, the strategies, and the payoff matrix. How might one solve the problem of financing public goods? Provide examples.
Question 5. Set up the game for AYK model for bargaining and explain how access to...
Question 5. Set up the game for AYK model for bargaining and explain how access to abortions changes the Nash equilibrium and we would observe an increase in nonmarital fertility in the society.
Question 4: Jar Game Consider the following game: Players: 2 - We designate player #1 to...
Question 4: Jar Game Consider the following game: Players: 2 - We designate player #1 to be the one that starts with the jar. Actions: - Each round at the same time both players deposit between 1 to 4 pennies into the jar. - Then both players are able to count the pennies in the jar. - If there are 21 or more pennies, the person with the jar is the winner. - If there are 20 or less pennies,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT