In: Economics
| 
 Person  | 
 Salary in Period 1  | 
 Salary in Period 2  | 
| 
 Billy  | 
 $0  | 
 $3,000  | 
| 
 Phillip  | 
 $3,500  | 
 $3,780  | 
| 
 Turanga  | 
 $4,000  | 
 $4,320  | 
| 
 Amy  | 
 $4,417  | 
 $4,770  | 
| 
 Hubert  | 
 $5,000  | 
 $5,400  | 
| 
 Total  | 
 $16,917  | 
 $21,270  | 
q1) Tax collection from an individual with income x is given by: a) 0 if x=0 (b) 0.3x if 0< x <= 4000 (c) 0.3x + 0.45(x-4000) if x>4000
Thus, total tax collection in first period =
(0.3*3500) + (0.3*4000) + (0.3*4000 + 0.45*(4417-4000)) + (0.3*4000 + 0.45*(5000-4000))
= 5287.65
q2) total tax collection in second period =
(0.3*3000) + (0.3*3780) + (0.3*4000 + 0.45*(4320-4000)) + (0.3*4000 + 0.45*(4770-4000)) + (0.3*4000 + 0.45*(5400-4000))
= 6754.5
q3) Total first period income (billy is automatically excluded) = 16917
Total first period income (excluding billy) = 21270 - 3000 = 18270
% change =( ( y in period 2 - y in period 1)/ (y in period 1)) * 100 = ( 18270 - 16917 / 16917)*100 = 8.35%
q4) As the income increases from the first perod to second, the tax revenues have also incraesed. Thus, if the conomy is in a boom, progressive axes act as a good way to keep it in check by increasing compulasaty payments to givernment and thus acts as automatic stabilizers.