In: Statistics and Probability
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act mandates that 40 years of age or older be treated without regard to age in all phases of employment (hiring, promotions, firings, etc.) Age discrimination cases are of two types: disparate treatment and disparate impact. In the former, the issue is whether workers have been intentionally discriminated against. In the latter, the issue is whether employment practices adversely affect the protected class (i.e., Zabell, 1989). During the recession of the early 1990s, a small computer manufacturer laid off 10 of its 20 software engineers. The ages of all the engineer at the time of the lay-off are shown in the table below.
Not Laid off: 34,55,42,38,42,32,40,40,46,29
Laid off: 52,35,40,41,40,39,40,64,47,44
Answer to part a)
out of the 20 people to be laid off
number of people who are 40 or above = (55, 42, 42, 40, 40, 46, 52, 40, 41, 40, 40, 64 , 47, 44) = 14
Probability = Number of people who are 40 or above / total number of people
Probability = 14/20
Probability = 0.70
.
Answer to part b)
For all 20 numbers
The median occurs at = (N+1) / 2 position
Position of median = (20+1)/2 = 10.5th position
Hence median = (10th + 11th value) /2
10 th value = 40
11th value = 40
Hence Median = (40+40)/2
Median = 40
.
For not laid group, N = 10
Median position = (N+1)/2 = 11/2 = 5.5 th value
Median = (5th + 6th value) /2
5th value = 40
6th value = 40
Median = (40+40)/2
Median = 40
.
For laid off group:
Again Median = (5th value + 6th value) / 2 , because N = 10
here 5th value = 40
6th value = 41
Hence Median = (40+41)/2
Median = 40.5
.
Part c)
Since the median age is almost same for both the groups, there cannot be any disparity in the two groups based on age, and hence the company may not be vulnerable to disparity impact