Question

In: Economics

Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC=36- 2E....

Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC=36- 2E. The information on pollution damages is given by MD=E .
(a) If there is a tax rate on emissions of $ 9/unit, then what is the emission level choosen by the polluter in equilibrium? What is the amount of its compliance costs?
(b) What is the socially efficient tax rate in the given situaton?
(c) Now imagine a situation where the polluter bargains with the community ( let's say, with the community government) and offers to pay $6 for each unit of emission ( i.e. $6/unit) it is allowed to produce. What level of emissions is the community likely to allow? What is the likely net gain to the community from allowing those units of emissions?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a) When the tax rate on emissions is $ 9/unit, the marginal abatement cost can be modified as

MAC = 36 - 2E - 9 = 25 - 2E

This is because for every unit of emission you reduce, you gain $9 in saved taxes and hence, this is subtracted from the abatement cost.

Firm minimizes total abatement cost with respect to E by equating MAC = 0

i.e. E = 12.5 units.

When there is a tax rate on emissions of $ 9/unit, emission level choosen by the polluter in equilibrium is 12.5 units.

Compliance cost is simply given by amount paid in tax = 12.5*9 = 112.5

(b) Socially efficient emission level is given by MD=MAC

E=36 - 2E

E = 36/3 = 12

Therefore, ocially efficient emission level is 12 units

Let the tax rate required to acheive this be t

MAC = 36 - 2E - t

Firm minimizes total abatement cost with respect to E by equating MAC = 0

i.e. 36 - 2E - t = 0

Socially optimal emission level is E = 12

For this, tax rate t must be such that 36 - 2*12 = t

i.e. t = $12

Therefore, socially efficient tax rate is $12/unit.

(c) If the polluter pays $6 to the community for every unit of pollution, MD is now modified to be E - 6. Community minimizes TD which is at MD = 0 i.e. E = 6. Therefore, community allows 6 units of emission when paid $6/unit of emission.

Gain in payment from firm = 6E = 6*6 = 36

Loss due to emissions = E2 = 6*6

Net gain of the community = 36 - 36 = 0


Related Solutions

Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC=36- 2E....
Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC=36- 2E. The information on pollution damages is given by MD=E . (a) If there is a tax rate on emissions of $ 9/unit, then what is the emission level choosen by the polluter in equilibrium? What is the amount of its compliance costs? (b) What is the socially efficient tax rate in the given situation? (c) Now imagine a situation where the polluter bargains with...
18. Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC=36-...
18. Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC=36- 2E. The information on pollution damages is given by MD=E . (a) If there is a tax rate on emissions of $ 9/unit, then what is the emission level choosen by the polluter in equilibrium? What is the amount of its compliance costs? (b) What is the socially efficient tax rate in the given situation? (c) Now imagine a situation where the polluter bargains...
Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC =...
Suppose a community faces a pollution problem because of emissions from a polluter with MAC = 36 - 21 The information on pollution damages is given by MD = E (a) If there is a tax rate on emissions of \$ 9/unit , then what is the emission level choosen by the polluter in equilibrium? What is the amount of its compliance costs? (b) What is the socially efficient tax rate in the given situaton? () Now imagine a situation...
2. A community suffers from a pollution problem created by a polluter with MAC=60-2E. The damage...
2. A community suffers from a pollution problem created by a polluter with MAC=60-2E. The damage to community from the pollution is captured by MD= 3E. (a) If an emission the tax rate of $16/unit is applied, what will be the polluter's compliance costs in equilibrium? Show work. (b) If emission standard is set at E= 20, what is the amount of compliance costs faced by the polluter? Show work. (c) What is the best way to choose standard from...
The aggregate MAC function for some polluter is given by MAC=200-2E, where E is measured in...
The aggregate MAC function for some polluter is given by MAC=200-2E, where E is measured in millions of tons, and the MD function is given by MD = 2E.                        Graph both functions and solve for the socially-efficient level of emissions. What size emissions tax per ton is needed to achieve the socially-efficient level of emissions? Explain. Compute the total tax bill and total abatement cost to polluters if they reduced their emissions to the socially-efficient level. What is the net...
14.Suppose that the marginal damages to society from air pollution are MD = 6+ 2e, where...
14.Suppose that the marginal damages to society from air pollution are MD = 6+ 2e, where e is the level of air pollution. Suppose also that the marginal cost of reducing the air pollution on the part of firms is MC = 150 - e. a. Find the optimal level of pollution. Illustrate graphically. b. Find the net gain to society, assuming firms were initially not controlling emissions at all. c. What level of tax would achieve the optimal level...
Suppose there are two sources that cause pollution at a receptor site. Let e denote emissions...
Suppose there are two sources that cause pollution at a receptor site. Let e denote emissions and q denote abatement, or pollution controlled. Source e MAC Plant 400 10 qp Farm 200 10 qF K ≡ concentration K = 0.01ep + 0.02eF a. What is concentration level at the receptor site without any abatement? Suppose the regulatory authority has chosen a target of 5.4. b. What allocation would achieve this target? Is this a cost-effective allocation? c. What ambient charge...
In a study of exhaust emissions from school buses, the pollution intake by passengers was determined...
In a study of exhaust emissions from school buses, the pollution intake by passengers was determined for a sample of 9 school buses used in the Southern California Air Basin. The pollution intake is the amount of exhaust emissions, in grams per person, that would be breathed in while traveling on the bus during its usual 18-mile trip on congested freeways from South Central LA to a magnet school in West LA. (As a reference, the average intake of motor...
In a study of exhaust emissions from school buses, the pollution intake by passengers was determined...
In a study of exhaust emissions from school buses, the pollution intake by passengers was determined for a sample of nine school buses used in the Southern California Air Basin. The pollution intake is the amount of exhaust emissions, in grams per person, that would be inhaled while traveling on the bus during its usual 18-mile trip on congested freeways from South Central LA to a magnet school in West LA. Here are the amounts for the nine buses when...
Workers and retirees live together in a neighborhood with emissions from a nearby factory causing pollution....
Workers and retirees live together in a neighborhood with emissions from a nearby factory causing pollution. The marginal damages for workers is 2e and the marginal damages for the retirees is 6e. The polluting factory has a marginal savings of 20 − 2e. 1) What is the MPB of workers and retirees? What is the aggregate MSB? 2) what is the factory's marginal abatement cost (MAC)? 3) whats the optimal abatement level?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT