In: Economics
Pick any contemporary policy issue, debate, or an aspect of the way government works today and then explain how that issue or procedure demonstrates Federalist and Anti-federalist principles.
This is all the questions asks.
The Ratification of the Constitution
The debate over the Constitution entailed conflict and compromise. Even when it was completed, some people were unhappy with it. The task of fixing the ailing Confederate government was not complete yet; each state had to ratify, or approve, the Constitution.
Basically, people divided into two groups, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Each of their viewpoints is worth examining, as they both have sound reasoning.
The Anti-Federalists such as James Mason and Patrick Henry did not want to ratify the Constitution. Basically, they argued that:
Of these complaints, the lack of a bill of rights was the most effective. The American people had just fought a war to defend their rights, and they did not want an intimidating national government taking those rights away again. The lack of a bill of rights was the focus of the Anti-Federalist campaign against ratification.
The Federalists, such as James Madison and George Washington, had answers to all of the Anti-Federalist complaints. Among them:
Overall, the Federalists were more organized in their efforts. By June of 1788, the Constitution was close to ratification. Nine states had ratified it, and only one more (New Hampshire) was needed. To achieve this, the Federalists agreed that once Congress met, it would draft a bill of rights. Finally, New York and Virginia approved, and the Constitution was a reality. Interestingly, the Bill of Rights was not originally a part of the Constitution, and yet it has proved to be highly important to protecting the rights of the people.