In: Economics
Sen and Nussbaum discuss the "capabilities" approach to measuring poverty. How does this differ from traditional approaches? How do people with fewer capabilities get ahead? How are they prevented from getting ahead?
The capability approach (also referred to as the capabilities approach) was initially conceived in the 1980s as an approach to welfare economics. In this approach, Amartya Sen brings together a range of ideas that were hitherto excluded from (or inadequately formulated in) traditional approaches to the economics of welfare. The core focus of the capability approach is on what individuals are able to do (i.e., capable of).
Initially Sen argued for five components in assessing capability:
The importance of real freedoms in the assessment of a person's
advantage
Individual differences in the ability to transform resources into
valuable activities
The multi-variate nature of activities giving rise to
happiness
A balance of materialistic and nonmaterialistic factors in
evaluating human welfare
Concern for the distribution of opportunities within society
Subsequently, and in collaboration particularly with political philosopher Martha Nussbaum, development economist Sudhir Anand and economic theorist James Foster, Sen has helped to make the capabilities approach predominant as a paradigm for policy debate in human development where it inspired the creation of the UN's Human Development Index (a popular measure of human development, capturing capabilities in health, education, and income). In addition, the approach has been operationalised with a high income country focus by Paul Anand and colleagues.[2][3] Furthermore, since the creation of the Human Development and Capability Association in the early 2000s, the approach has been much discussed by political theorists, philosophers and a range of social sciences, including those with a particular interest in human health.
The approach emphasizes functional capabilities ("substantive freedoms", such as the ability to live to old age, engage in economic transactions, or participate in political activities); these are construed in terms of the substantive freedoms people have reason to value, instead of utility (happiness, desire-fulfillment or choice) or access to resources (income, commodities, assets). Poverty is understood as capability-deprivation. It is noteworthy that the emphasis is not only on how human beings actually function but also on their having the capability, which is a practical choice, to function in important ways if they so wish. Someone could be deprived of such capabilities in many ways, e.g. by ignorance, government oppression, lack of financial resources, or false consciousness.
This approach to human well-being emphasizes the importance of freedom of choice, individual heterogeneity and the multi-dimensional nature of welfare. In significant respects, the approach is consistent with the handling of choice within conventional microeconomics consumer theory although its conceptual foundations enable it to acknowledge the existence of claims, like rights, which normatively dominate utility-based claims.
The capabilities approach is meant to identify a space in which we can make cross-cultural judgments about ways of life. The capabilities approach is radically different from, yet indebted to, traditional ethical theories such as virtue ethics, consequentialism and deontology.
The ethical theories that have dominated Western philosophy include (in one form or another) virtue ethics, consequentialism and deontology. The capabilities cannot be reduced to any of those ethical theories, however, it is indebted more or less to each of them.
The ten capabilities Nussbaum argues should be supported by all
democracies are:
Life. Being able to live to the end of a human life of normal
length; not dying prematurely, or before one's life is so reduced
as to be not worth living.
Bodily Health. Being able to have good health, including
reproductive health; to be adequately nourished; to have adequate
shelter.
Bodily Integrity. Being able to move freely from place to place; to
be secure against violent assault, including sexual assault and
domestic violence; having opportunities for sexual satisfaction and
for choice in matters of reproduction.
Senses, Imagination, and Thought. Being able to use the senses, to
imagine, think, and reason—and to do these things in a "truly
human" way, a way informed and cultivated by an adequate education,
including, but by no means limited to, literacy and basic
mathematical and scientific training. Being able to use imagination
and thought in connection with experiencing and producing works and
events of one's own choice, religious, literary, musical, and so
forth. Being able to use one's mind in ways protected by guarantees
of freedom of expression with respect to both political and
artistic speech, and freedom of religious exercise. Being able to
have pleasurable experiences and to avoid non-beneficial
pain.
Emotions. Being able to have attachments to things and people
outside ourselves; to love those who love and care for us, to
grieve at their absence; in general, to love, to grieve, to
experience longing, gratitude, and justified anger. Not having
one's emotional development blighted by fear and anxiety.
(Supporting this capability means supporting forms of human
association that can be shown to be crucial in their
development.)
Practical Reason. Being able to form a conception of the good and
to engage in critical reflection about the planning of one's life.
(This entails protection for the liberty of conscience and
religious observance.)
Affiliation.
Being able to live with and toward others, to recognize and show
concern for other humans, to engage in various forms of social
interaction; to be able to imagine the situation of another.
(Protecting this capability means protecting institutions that
constitute and nourish such forms of affiliation, and also
protecting the freedom of assembly and political speech.)
Having the social bases of self-respect and non-humiliation; being
able to be treated as a dignified being whose worth is equal to
that of others. This entails provisions of non-discrimination on
the basis of race, sex, sexual orientation, ethnicity, caste,
religion, national origin and species.
Other Species. Being able to live with concern for and in relation
to animals, plants, and the world of nature.
Play. Being able to laugh, to play, to enjoy recreational
activities.
Control over one's Environment.
Political. Being able to participate effectively in political
choices that govern one's life; having the right of political
participation, protections of free speech and association.
Material. Being able to hold property (both land and movable
goods), and having property rights on an equal basis with others;
having the right to seek employment on an equal basis with others;
having the freedom from unwarranted search and seizure. In work,
being able to work as a human, exercising practical reason and
entering into meaningful relationships of mutual recognition with
other workers.
One time only one question solved