In: Statistics and Probability
Q: Assistance to understand clearly and solve this example from Probability and Statistical Inference with the steps of the solution to better understand, thanks.
**Please give the step by step with details to completely see how the solution came about, plenty of thanks.
1) To test two methods of instruction, 50 students are selected at random from each of two groups. At the end of the instruction period, each student is assigned a grade (A, B, C, D, or F) by an evaluating team. The data are recorded as following:
Grades
A | B | C | D | F | Totals | |
Group I | 8 | 13 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 50 |
Group II | 6 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 6 | 50 |
Test the null hypothesis H0 that the two methods of instruction made no difference at the 5% significance level.
Null hypothesis:Ho: two methods of instruction made no difference
Alternate hypothesis:Ha: two methods of instruction made significant difference
degree of freedom(df) =(rows-1)*(columns-1)= | 4 |
for 4 df and 0.05 level of signifcance critical region χ2= | 9.488 |
Applying chi square test :
Ei=row total*column total/grand total | A | B | C | D | E | Total |
Group1 | 7.000 | 11.500 | 15.000 | 12.000 | 4.500 | 50 |
Group2 | 7.000 | 11.500 | 15.000 | 12.000 | 4.500 | 50 |
total | 14 | 23 | 30 | 24 | 9 | 100 |
=(Oi-Ei)2/Ei | A | B | C | D | E | Total |
Group1 | 0.1429 | 0.1957 | 0.0667 | 0.3333 | 0.5000 | 1.239 |
Group2 | 0.1429 | 0.1957 | 0.0667 | 0.3333 | 0.5000 | 1.239 |
total | 0.286 | 0.391 | 0.133 | 0.667 | 1.000 | 2.4770 |
Asa test statistics X2 =2.477 does not fall in rejection region; we can not reject null hypothesis
we do not have evidence at 0.05 level to conclude that two methods of instruction made significant difference