In: Statistics and Probability
Nonparametric Methods
In this assignment, we will use the following nonparametric
methods:
Part 1: Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test
Let's take a hypothetical situation. The World Health Organization (WHO) wants to investigate whether building irrigation systems in an African region helped reduce the number of new cases of malaria and increased the public health level.
Data was collected for the following variables from ten different cities of Africa:
Table 1: Cases of Malaria
City | Before | After |
1 | 110 | 55 |
2 | 240 | 75 |
3 | 68 | 15 |
4 | 100 | 10 |
5 | 120 | 21 |
6 | 110 | 11 |
7 | 141 | 41 |
8 | 113 | 5 |
9 | 112 | 13 |
10 | 110 | 8 |
Using the Minitab statistical analysis program to enter the data and perform the analysis, complete the following:
Wilcoxon signed rank test:
Step.1 First enter data in minitab.
Step.2 Find difference between number of cases before and after the irrigation systems were built.
Step.3 Go to 'Stat' ---> 'Nonparametric' ----> select '1-sample wilcoxon' . New window will pop-up on screen. Refer following screen shot and provide required information accordingly.
Minitab output:
MTB > Let 'Difference' = 'Before' - 'After'
MTB > WTest 0 'Difference';
SUBC> Alternative 0.
Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test: Difference
Test of median = 0.000000 versus median ≠ 0.000000
N for Wilcoxon Estimated
N Test Statistic P Median
Difference 10 10 55.0 0.006 99.00
Since p-value for Wilcoxon signed rank test is 0.006 which is less than 0.05, hence we reject null hypothesis and conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the number of cases before and after the irrigation systems were built.
Wilcoxon Rank sum Test:
Step.3 Go to 'Stat' ---> 'Nonparametric' ----> select 'Mann Whitney' . New window will pop-up on screen. Refer following screen shot and provide required information accordingly.
Output:
MTB > Mann-Whitney 95.0 'Before' 'After';
SUBC> Alternative 0.
Mann-Whitney Test and CI: Before, After
N Median
Before 10 111.00
After 10 14.00
Point estimate for η1 - η2 is 97.00
95.5 Percent CI for η1 - η2 is (62.98,106.98)
W = 154.0
Test of η1 = η2 vs η1 ≠ η2 is significant at 0.0002
The test is significant at 0.0002 (adjusted for ties)
Since p-value for Mann whitney test is 0.0002 which is less than 0.05, hence we reject null hypothesis and conclude that there is significant difference between number of cases before and after the irrigation systems were built.
It means building this system significantly reduce malaria cases.