Question

What kinds of Theoretical and practical problems do arise if one believes in a perfect God, all-powerful, all-knowing and all-good? How could one define God in a world with evil? In Philosophy

Answer 1

1)
Theoretical and practical problems do arise if one believes in a perfect God, all-powerful, all-knowing and all-good. Any venture to make the nearness of an All-seeing, All-weighty and All-choice or omnibenevolent God consistent with the nearness of vindictiveness is known as a Theodicy. It is an undertaking to legitimize the strategies for god to individuals. It is as try to explain the simultaneousness of God and Evil.

By and by what works in those undertakings to store the chance of the nearness of a divine being from the charge that there can't be a heavenly nature if there is perfect contemptible is the unnoticeable changing over of the chance of the god from that of a unique and all ideal being to an alternative that is beside that. All responses of these religious realists or protections comprise of revealing the unpretentious undertaking to exchange over the chance of the overwhelming being from one which so perfect as to make the Problem of Evil in any case to the chance of the god as not actually being all perfect or all understanding or all superb or all obvious. The Problem of Evil is the impact of : The abnormality in the contemplations of an endlessly learned, all striking and all astounding being that is the producer of the universe with the nearness of top clever.

2)

This is the area the conflict of mischievous as confirmation towards God's quality boomerangs into a competition for His existence. On the off hazard that there's an over the top legitimate elegant or guideline of value, at that factor there ought to be an extraordinary genuine Lawgiver. Without His moral guideline we would not comprehend what pernicious genuinely is. Furthermore, without His powerful comfort we would not have the alternative to continue on by means of severe dislike—in any occasion not with any sensible desire and comfort.

God should have made a worldwide without a deviousness in it. Be that since it might, it would had been viewed as one of robots and puppets—creatures who couldn't esteem Him or someone else. Love is possible just with the desire for complimentary genuine creatures; confined love is a legitimate irregularity. Thusly, all together for the part to be morally worthy, it must be morally free. Besides, loosened creatures can do free choices that convey illness, disaster and destruction. This is the field where we live.