Question

In: Operations Management

Caterpillar is the world's leading maker of earth-moving machinery and supplier of agricultural equipment. Caterpillar wants...

Caterpillar is the world's leading maker of earth-moving machinery and supplier of agricultural equipment. Caterpillar wants to end its support for its Dealer Business System (DBS), which it licenses to its dealers to help them run their business. The software in this system is becoming outdated and senior management want to transfer support for the hosted version of the software to Accenture Consultants so it can concentrate on its core business. Caterpillar never required its dealers to use DBS, but the system has become a de facto standard for doing business with the company. The majority if its 50 Cat dealers in North America use some version of DBS, as do about the half of the other too or so Cat dealers in the rest of the world. Before Caterpillar turns the product over to Accenture, they call you in as a change consultant.

1. What factors and issues should it consider? What are the pluses and minuses?

2. What questions should it ask?

3. What questions should it ask its dealers?

4. How would you recommend that Caterpillar implement this change?

Solutions

Expert Solution

This is a situation being faced a big number of major companies. Due to the ever-developing technology in IT and otherwise, there is a constant need of change in the practices being followed to keep the company up to date with industry standards.

For Cat’s situation given.

  1. The biggest factor for this change would be to train the dealers and other users on the new interface. As a change consultant, I believe that moving on with new technology is the best option a company can take provided its employees and other associates are trained well and are supported by the company in this change. The biggest advantage would be staying up to date with industry standards. This, along with providing more efficient business processes, would also keep the company image strong in the industry. Now, this can also be a very big reason for underperformance if all users are not supported / trained properly for the new interface.
  2. The questions to the dealers from my side would be entirely based on their experience with the old systems. Were there any features that made work easy? What were the limitations of the previous systems? What did you like about the previous systems? How much impact did the system have on you and your performance? And most importantly, were you comfortable with the previous systems.
  3. To implement these changes, there should be phases of rollout. First phase should be of asking the questions mentioned above and getting feedback from them. Then, as the change consultant, all of these feedbacks should be linked to features on the new system. For example, if a user liked a particular feature on the previous system, they should be explained how to easily perform the same on the new one. As another example, if a user felt a drawback/limitation in the previous systems, they should be explained that how it is being included in the new Accenture system. This is a very important phase as this will increase the acceptability of the new system across users and company won’t face many issues in performance. After this counselling phase, they should roll out the new system area wise. For example, as North America has most users, they can roll it out to them first. Then after feedback they can slowly roll out to the rest of the world as well.

Following a phased change will be a good idea for a company as such to keep the performance on track even on changing work environment.


Related Solutions

France stands as one of the world's leading economic powers, possessing large agricultural, industrial and service...
France stands as one of the world's leading economic powers, possessing large agricultural, industrial and service sectors. France operates a mixed economy that combines capitalist and socialist characteristics. Capitalism involves private ownership of capital and other means of production. Under socialism, the government directs economic activity and owns all or part of most industries. Despite extensive reforms over the years that have reduced government intervention in the economy, the French government still exercises great control over the economy, owning shares...
Millington Materials is a leading supplier of building equipment, building products, materials, and timber for sale,...
Millington Materials is a leading supplier of building equipment, building products, materials, and timber for sale, with over 200 branches across the Mid-South. On January 1, 2021, management decided to change from the average inventory costing method to the FIFO inventory costing method at each of its outlets. The following table presents information concerning the change. The income tax rate for all years is 25%. Income before Income Tax FIFO Average Cost Difference Before 2020 $ 30 million $ 16...
Millington Materials is a leading supplier of building equipment, building products, materials & timber for sale,...
Millington Materials is a leading supplier of building equipment, building products, materials & timber for sale, with over 200 branches across the Mid-South. On January 1, 2018, management decided to change from the average inventory costing method to the FIFO inventory costing method at each of its outlets. The following table presents information concerning the change. The income tax rate for all years is 40%.     Income before Income Tax     FIFO   Average Cost   Difference Before 2017   $   15   million  ...
Millington Materials is a leading supplier of building equipment, building products, materials, and timber for sale,...
Millington Materials is a leading supplier of building equipment, building products, materials, and timber for sale, with over 200 branches across the Mid-South. On January 1, 2021, management decided to change from the average inventory costing method to the FIFO inventory costing method at each of its outlets. The following table presents information concerning the change. The income tax rate for all years is 25%. Income before Income Tax FIFO Average Cost Difference Before 2020 $ 21 million $ 14...
On January 1, Snipes Construction paid for earth moving equipment by issuing a 350,000, 2 year...
On January 1, Snipes Construction paid for earth moving equipment by issuing a 350,000, 2 year note that specified 4% interest to be paid on December 31 of each year. The equipments retail cash price was unknown, but it was determined that a reasonable interest rate was 7% At what amount should Snipes record the equipment and the note? what journal entry should it record for the transaction? n= i= Loan repayments       Amount Present Value Interest Principal Price of equipment
Three mutually exclusive​ earth-moving pieces of equipment are being considered for several large building projects in...
Three mutually exclusive​ earth-moving pieces of equipment are being considered for several large building projects in India over the next five years. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The construction​ company's MARR is 18% per year. Which of the three​ alternatives, if​ any, should be​ adopted? Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. Caterpillar Deere Case Capital investment ​$22,000 ​$26,400 ​$17,500 Net annual revenue ​$6,500 ​$9,000 ​$5,200 Salvage value ​$4,500 ​$5,000 ​$3,750 Useful life 4 years...
JLMB Company owns earth moving equipment that cost ?98,000. After 8 years, it will have estimated...
JLMB Company owns earth moving equipment that cost ?98,000. After 8 years, it will have estimated salvage value of ?18,000. Compute the depreciation charge for each of the first two years and the book value at the end of 4 years by each of the following three methods of depreciation: a. straight line method; b. sum-of-the-years digit method; and c. double declining balance method.
Keller Construction is considering two new investments. Project E calls for the purchase of earth-moving equipment....
Keller Construction is considering two new investments. Project E calls for the purchase of earth-moving equipment. Project H represents the investment in a hydraulic lift. Keller wishes to use a NPV profile in comparing the projects. The investment and cash flow patterns are as follows: Use Appendix B. Project E ($20,000 investment) Project H ($20,000 investment) Year Cash Flow Year Cash Flow 1 $5,000 1 $16,000 2   6,000 2 5,000 3 7,000 3 4,000 4 10,000 a. Determine the NPV...
Keller Construction is considering two new investments. Project E calls for the purchase of earth-moving equipment....
Keller Construction is considering two new investments. Project E calls for the purchase of earth-moving equipment. Project H represents the investment in a hydraulic lift. Keller wishes to use a NPV profile in comparing the projects. The investment and cash flow patterns are as follows: Use Appendix B. Project E ($20,000 investment) Project H ($20,000 investment) Year Cash Flow Year Cash Flow 1 $5,000 1 $16,000 2 6,000 2 5,000 3 7,000 3 4,000 4 10,000 a. Determine the NPV...
Ricardo Heavy Hauling has some earth-moving equipment that cost $362,000; accumulated amortization is $241,400. Ricardo traded...
Ricardo Heavy Hauling has some earth-moving equipment that cost $362,000; accumulated amortization is $241,400. Ricardo traded equipment with another construction company. The fair value of Ricardo’s old equipment is estimated to be $188,500, and the fair value of the equipment being acquired is estimated to be $238,800. Four different possible scenarios are presented below: The new equipment will perform essentially the same tasks as the old equipment. The estimate of the fair value of the new equipment is the more...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT