Question

In: Operations Management

Public corporations are led by CEOs and other upper-echelon leaders who, in turn report to shareholders...

Public corporations are led by CEOs and other upper-echelon leaders who, in turn report to shareholders and board of directors (BODs). Interestingly, even though the board overseas the CEOs, decides on the terms of employment and salaries, and monitors their performance, the CEOs are, more often than not, the people who nominate board members. The justification is that CEOs are well placed to know what type of expertise they need on the board and should have a BOD they can work with. The relationship between BOD and CEO is a complex and interesting one.

What are the potential ethical and conflict of interest issues arising from CEO involvement in the selection of board members?

How can these issues be addressed?
cite a minimum of one outside source.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The Board of Directors are directly in charge of the appointing and terminating of the CEO, and are responsible for overseeing the Corporation ’s issues and its management. Therefore, CEO — the one individual specifically in charge of that management — nominating the directors could lead to a conflict of interest. The potential situations of conflict of interests can make open doors for abuse, as CEO may abuse his position and cover from the board potential issues and any issues created by his management. Board individuals may likewise neglect their institutional obligations out of individual loyalty to the CEO. CEO may welcome dear companions to join the board as executives. Board members being nominated by the CEO to might be affected by a feeling of dedication or obligation to the director or CEO, regardless of whether the CEO or executive isn't acting to the greatest advantage of the organization or its investors or different partners.

Measures to address conflict of interest:


1. Conflict resolution policy which should stipulate that all the board members should disclose their personal and monetary interests.

2. Well laid out procedures to deal with situations when instances of conflict of interest arise

3. Presence of an autonomous board that actively involves itself in the business to protect the interests of shareholders


Related Solutions

Public corporations are led by Chief Executive Officers (CEO) and other upper-echelon leaders who, in turn...
Public corporations are led by Chief Executive Officers (CEO) and other upper-echelon leaders who, in turn report to shareholders and board of directors (BOD). Interestingly, even though the BOD oversees the CEO, decides on the terms of employment and salaries, and monitors the overall performance, the CEO is, more often than not, the person that nominates board members. The justification? The CEO are well placed to know what type of expertise is needed on the board and should have a...
Recent legislation requires CEOs of public corporations to sign an affidavit, a sworn statement, stating that...
Recent legislation requires CEOs of public corporations to sign an affidavit, a sworn statement, stating that all accountings put forth by the company are accurate and not misleading; not to the best of their knowledge, but that they are accurate and not misleading. Obviously, the CEO of most public corporations can't personally perform all aspects of these accountings. Instead, they must rely on the accuracy of employees assigned to perform such tasks at various levels. The legislation makes the CEO...
How do public health and healthcare delivery systems complement and compete with each other? Who are...
How do public health and healthcare delivery systems complement and compete with each other? Who are the influential parties and opinion leaders in the components of these systems at the various levels? Where are the consistencies and inconsistencies of these systems with Scripture? (hint: widows, orphans, work, gleaning 400-500 words respond
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT