|
1.
|
How does syntax allow a person to know the meaning of a
combination of words he has never heard before such as "The pink
hippopotamus flipped backward over the yellow duck?"
|
a. by knowing what relational
meaning between the words mean when they occur in that order |
|
|
|
b. by knowing what each word in the
sentence means |
|
|
|
c. by having heard each of the
words in other contexts and generalizing to the current one |
|
|
|
d. no meaning would occur in this
case since these events are not possible. |
|
|
|
2.
|
Which of the following would be an example of a functional
category or closed class of words?
|
3.
|
If the child utters the words "bad" followed by "boy", what
would signal that it is a vertical construction versus true syntax
or a two-word utterance?
|
a. The context of the words does
not make any sense. |
|
|
|
b. The two words have never been
combined before. |
|
|
|
c. The two words are never used
separately or with other words. |
|
|
|
d. There is a pause between the
words and the intonation pattern of each word is what is found when
said alone. |
|
|
|
4.
|
The early three word utterances of children usually
|
a. express the same relational
meanings as two word utterances. |
|
|
|
b. express a greatly expanded set
of relational meanings. |
|
|
|
c. contain at least two grammatical
morphemes. |
|
|
|
d. appear much less egocentric than
two word utterances. |
|
|
|
5.
|
Why do Turkish children sometimes combine a word with a
grammatical morpheme (inflected forms) before they combine words
whereas English children usually don't start using morphemes until
the three-word stage?
|
a. The Turkish language is very
basic and only contains a few frequently used grammatical
morphemes. |
|
|
|
b. The Turkish language has more
regular forms of morphemes than English. |
|
|
|
c. Turkish morphemes serve the same
function as English words. |
|
|
|
d. Turkish mothers are more active
in the training of grammatical morphemes. |
|
|
|
6.
|
Children usually first mark a yes/no question by
|
a. placing the question marker such
as "why" at the beginning of the utterance. |
|
|
|
b. gestures, like upturned
hands. |
|
|
|
|
d. babbles combined with a question
marker. |
|
|
|
7.
|
Those children who are able to produce multiword utterances by
paying attention to overall prosodic features yield unanalyzed
chunks, sometimes impressively long utterance, are considered
|
a. to be impaired in later
grammatical development. |
|
|
|
b. to have an advantage in
grammatical development. |
|
|
|
c. to be operating in an analytical
or bottom-up approach. |
|
|
|
d. to be operating in a holistic or
top-down approach. |
|
|
|
8.
|
What would a child's utterance of "The bad boys hurted the
girl," be counted as in terms of finding the child's mean length of
utterance where all morphemes are counted?
|
9.
|
The child hears "the boy was hit by the ball," and interprets
that to mean that the ball hit the boy. What sentence comprehension
strategy might the child be using to understand the utterance?
|
a. the greater familiarity with the
concept of boy than ball |
|
|
|
b. his experience that boys are
usually the one hitting balls |
|
|
|
c. the sentence comprehension
strategy of word order |
|
|
|
d. the best guess grammatical
heuristic |
|
|
|
10.
|
How do those researchers who follow the universal grammar
position explain the difficulty four year old children have in
comprehending co-reference relations in complex sentences (e.g.,
"John promised Bill to go") since they assume it is a part of this
innate knowledge?
|
a. Children do not have a context
that supports the meaning of these sentence types. |
|
|
|
b. Children lack the proper
experiences with these to acquire them. |
|
|
|
c. Four year olds have not reached
the maturation level to yield the innate knowledge to support this
form. |
|
|
|
d. The position can't explain this
finding and is weakened by it. |
|
|
|
11.
|
What does a child's ability to imitate a sentence generally
means about her grammatical development?
|
a. Very little since children
readily imitate sentences beyond their level of comprehension or
grammatical development |
|
|
|
b. They have developed the
grammatical structure contained in the sentence. |
|
|
|
c. Very little about grammatical
development and much more about general cognitive development. |
|
|
|
d. Very little since there are
cases where production of grammar far exceeds comprehension. |
|
|
|
12.
|
The finding that 2 year olds children may put an inflection such
as "ed" or "ing" on one verb but not do so on another indicates
that
|
a. they do not have a syntactic
category for verb yet but are using other means to generate
verbs. |
|
|
|
b. the syntactic category of verb
for them is more central to their sentence structure. |
|
|
|
c. they are unable to categorize
any information at this stage of development. |
|
|
|
d. they lack the memory abilities
to hold the information long enough to allow for comparisons. |
|
|
|
13.
|
Which of the following findings would support the argument that
children are productive in their spontaneous speech or have
syntactic categories?
|
a. Finding that children are able
to repeat an utterance after hearing it one or two times. |
|
|
|
b. Finding that children are able
to say something across settings. |
|
|
|
c. Finding children say such as
"goed" or "runned" when inflecting verbs. |
|
|
|
d. Finding cross-cultural evidence
for the sounds in the first words. |
|
|
|
14.
|
According to the dual process model of past tense formation, the
young child knows that "went" is the past tense of "go" by the
process of ________ and that "thanked" is the pass tense of "thank"
by the process of ________ .
|
a. hypothesis testing; inductive
reasoning |
|
|
|
b. stimulus generalization;
overregularizaton |
|
|
|
c. core knowledge; experience
regularities |
|
|
|
d. memorization; rule
application |
|
|
|
15.
|
For semantic bootstrapping to work, the child must have an
innate knowledge of syntactic categories, prior knowledge of what
words means, and
|
a. the ability to categorize
information. |
|
|
|
b. an innate lexical acquisition
process. |
|
|
|
c. linking rules that map syntactic
categories onto their semantic correlates. |
|
|
|
d. the ability to form associations
between language structure and meaning. |
|
|
|
16.
|
If you believe that children learn grammatical categories by the
meaning of the words or by where they appear in the sentence, you
ideas would best fit the
|
|
b. constructivist approach. |
|
|
|
c. generativist approach. |
|
|
|
|