Question

In: Operations Management

In 2012, a New Jersey jury issued a verdict in an age discrimination suit filed against...

In 2012, a New Jersey jury issued a verdict in an age discrimination suit filed against Passaic County prosecutor James Avigliano. Six detectives with a total of 150 years of law enforcement between them were laid off by Avigliano’s office during a time of significant budget cuts in 2008. The detectives alleged that Avigliano had targeted them for forced retirement because of their age. As older, longtime employees, the six had significant pensions. The defense argued that the detectives’ pensions were a reason- able basis for requiring their early retirement. “[I]t had nothing to do with age,” the defense attorney told the jury. “Avigliano had to make a hard choice—a choice he didn’t want to make. He asked these guys to retire. They had benefits packages.” Given the extent of the necessary budget cuts, by laying off longtime employees with medical benefits and pensions, the defense argued, “fewer employees would have to be let go, and they’d have a safe landing.” The plaintiffs’ lawyer contended that targeting people for layoffs because they have pensions to fall back on is itself discriminatory, according to state discrimination statutes. In addition, such targeting is bad public policy.

“What incentive is there, then, to pay your dues?” the plaintiff’s attorney asked the jury. “We want the most experienced people on the streets.” How would you decide the case, if you were on this jury? What is your own judgment of Avigliano’s “hard choice?” Do you view his rationale for laying off older workers as “bad public policy” or the least harmful choice in light of economic pressures?

Solutions

Expert Solution

As a jury member, I would have ruled in favor of the laid-off detectives. The policy to simply let-go of experienced people because they have pensions to fall back on is discriminatory. Avigliano should have tied the pay of these detectives to their performance and laid off non-performing detectives from both groups i.e. experienced and young detectives. Further, though Avigliano's decisions were derived from harming the lesser number of people, it sets a bad precedent that you can be laid off irrespective of your performance.

In my opinion, Avigliano's choice was a least harmful choice in the light of economic pressure. In case he did not layoff 6 experienced detectives, he would have to let go of 10-12 young detectives with the lesser pay scale. Further, due to the economic downturn, it would have been difficult to find newer jobs for young detectives and they would have nothing as a backup option. Experienced detectives had huge pensions to take care of them for sometime during the downturn.


Related Solutions

A bicyclist filed suit against a truck driver, the trucking company, and the truck owner after...
A bicyclist filed suit against a truck driver, the trucking company, and the truck owner after being struck while riding with a group of bicyclists along the shoulder of a highway. The driver who struck the bicyclist on the highway admits he “took his eyes off the road for a very short period of time,” but he denies driving in a careless or negligent manner that breached a duty of care. The driver says the bicyclist was also negligent and...
Izmit Co, has filed a suit in a state court against EBS Co, and Izmit Co...
Izmit Co, has filed a suit in a state court against EBS Co, and Izmit Co has won the case . however, unsatisfied with the court decision, EBS Co has appealed against the decision claiming that the evidence presented at trial to support Izmit Co's claim was so weak that no reasonable jury could have found for the plaintiff. in effect, EBS Co has appealed to a state intermediate court of appeals, arguing that the appellate court should reverse the...
Z Co. filed suit against W Inc. in 2021 seeking damages for patent infringement. At December...
Z Co. filed suit against W Inc. in 2021 seeking damages for patent infringement. At December 31, 2021, legal counsel for Z believed that it was probable that Z would be successful against W for an estimated amount in the range of $30 million to $60 million, with each amount in that range considered equally likely. Z was awarded $40 million in April 2022. Z should report this award in its 2021 financial statements, issued in March 2022?
. During 2018, a former employee of Staple Company filed a lawsuit alleging age discrimination and...
. During 2018, a former employee of Staple Company filed a lawsuit alleging age discrimination and asking for damages of $500,000. At December 31, 2018,Staple's legal counsel indicated that the likelihood of losing the lawsuit was possible but not probable and a good estimate for any potential loss is approximately $250,000 based on previous experience with similar cases. How should this suit be handled on the 2018 financial statements?
A bond issued for the purpose of building a tunnel between New Jersey and New York...
A bond issued for the purpose of building a tunnel between New Jersey and New York in which tolls are expected to pay the coupon and principal payments to the bondholders is most likely characterized as a(n): a. General obligation bond b. Treasury bond c. Industrial development bond d. Revenue bond The most likely reason an organization would issue commercial paper is to: a. Finance a budget deficit b. Manage working capital c. Invest in long-term projects d. Refinance a...
Sixteen percent of drivers registered in New Jersey are black. Of the 324 speeding tickets issued...
Sixteen percent of drivers registered in New Jersey are black. Of the 324 speeding tickets issued in one month on the NJ Turnpike, 25% went to black drivers. Is the percentage of speeding tickets issued to blacks unusually high compared with the state's registration information? Use the alpha = 0.05 level of significance
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT