Question

In: Operations Management

The Hudson Valley Juice Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of National Beverage Corporation, headquartered in...

The Hudson Valley Juice Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of National Beverage Corporation, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. At its plant in Poughkeepsie, New York, Hudson Valley manufactures a number of different natural fruit juices, based on the fruits of Local region. It's most popular juice drink products are • Apple • Grape • Cherry

New source

At a Cincinnati meeting sponsored by the parent company, National Beverage Corporation, Debbie Wagner, Hudson Valley's purchasing agent for packaging materials, had met Jeff Smith, a colleague from another National Beverage Corporation subsidiary in Los Angeles, California. Talking shop, they had exchanged information and experiences. When Debbie• had confided in Jeff that she had experienced some difficulties lately in obtaining sufficient quantities of bottle closures at competitive prices, he suggested that she contact the Tight Cap Division of American Packaging Corporation. He reported that he had long bought from this source and was very pleased with their performance and responsiveness. Upon her return to Poughkeepsie, Debbie had called Tight Cap in Chicago, requesting a price quotation and sample caps. The caps were duly tested in the company's laboratory and Tight Cap's prices turned out to be quite attractive. So Debbie had placed an initial order for 500,000 bottle caps, to be delivered on a specified date.

Surprise! It is now:3:00 P.M. on Friday afternoon , and Debbie has just learned that the shipment of 500,000 bottle caps from Tight Cap, scheduled for arrival this morning, has not been received. These caps were to be used immediately in the production process, starting at 7:00 A.M. on Monday. No safety stock of these caps has been kept on hand. To make matters worse, apple juice which is to be produced using these caps is out of stock with a substantial backlog of orders on the books. As Debbie goes about sorting out the situation, people in the purchasing, production, and marketing departments nervously wonder what happened and what will happen. Amid the scurrying to attempt to determine the whereabouts of the missing caps, comments such as "it's not my job" and "why didn't you come to us earlier" are overheard.

A quick review of a copy of the purchase order tells Debbie that the designated routing is "best way." Also, instead of a specific delivery date, the notation reads ASAP (as soon as possible). The terms of delivery are noted as FOB.

Assignment: The four questions below are to be used as guidelines and thinking points for your analysis.

1. What mistakes were committed by Hudson Valley employees in this case? A: How could they have been avoided or at least minimized?

2. What are the pitfalls of routing traffic the "best way"? A: Is the delivery term "FOB" sufficient, and why or why not?

3. How can the correct selection of transportation mode help the overall profitability of the company?

4. How and by whom should decisions regarding transportation arrangements be made and why?

Solutions

Expert Solution

1) "Precaution is better than cure" Sometimes an unfortunate and unforseen things take place wherein we may get helpless so to avoid such time, one should take precaution in advance.

Here this mistake has been done by Hudson Valley Employees that they overlooked the situations that took place.

The following things overlooked by them:

  • If you need a certain thing always plan a date few days back rather calling the things on the same day like a specified date should have been the date much before the event of its use so that if they won't get delivered, one would be having the chance to approch another one.
  • They forgot to keep a safety inventory which must be kept for such unforseen events.
  • They didn't follow up with the vendor. The vendor would have informed of his failure if contacted much before.
  • They have to analysis the demand and supply chain must in advance to avoid stock short fall of Apple juice.

To avoid such problem, the following things will work:

  • They should approch two dealers at a time and made contract with one but should keep the other one in trust so that if one fails to deliver, other can be contacted.
  • Proper Commuincation between the vendor and purchaser
  • Ongoing Contract administration
  • Detailed Master Agreement mentioning the quality, Quantity and expectations in terms of service and delivery
  • Potential Risk to be identified and managed

2) Pitfalls of routing the Traffic the best way:

  • Filter out the traffic that should not be forwarded, such as local unicast frame
  • Prevent the forwarding of collisions
  • Prevent the forwarding of frames with errors
  • Virtual Local Area Network
  • Simple network management protocol
  • Statistics collection

FOB means Free on Board which means that the seller fulfills his obligation when the Goods have passed over the ship rail at the named port of shipment.

This means that the buyer has to bear all cost and risk of loss or demage to the goods from that point.

The FOB term requires the seller to clear the goods for export.

The seller must:

  • Provision of Goods in conformity with the Contract.
  • Provide the Goods and commercial invoice
  • Transfer of risk

FOB alone is not sufficient as when the goods leaves the Seller warehouse, the seller records the shipment as complete. This transfer the risk of loss and demange from the seller to the buyer. The buyer owns the product enroute to its warehouse and must pay the delivery charges.

Whereas, FOB Destination would be the perfect and complete term to be use in buyer best interest. So if the buyer is located in Austria then FOB Austria would be the term and destination. And only when the purchased shipment arrives in perfect condition does the buyer accept it and consider the inventory. The sale is officially complete at that time.

3) Transport is the major contributer to the economy and compititive force in buisness. It is the activity that physically connects the buisness to its supply chain partners such as suppliers and partners. And major influence on Customer satisfaction.

The business environment that is being strangled by volatile oil prices and high cost transportation solution has prompted organisation to rethink on their supply chain strategies. Three transport driven shifts in supply chain strategy in particular have emerged and are gaining ground:

  • A shift from offshoring to nearshoring
  • A shift from product design for marketability and production to design for shipability
  • A shift from lean inventory policies to hybrid lean transport/inventory policies

The Companies who have adopted these strategies has indicated that their benefits has gone beyond ameliorating transporation challenges. These shifts also help to improve supply chain and financial performance due to lower costs and more productive investments.

Transporation and logistics related cost as a percentage of sales range from 9 % to 14% depending on Industry sector for companies who do not adopt a 'Best in Class' managment approach. These percentage ranges include all logictics related expenses such as Warehousing, dedicated personnal and transporation expenses.

Transportation cost alone comprise the vast majority of this expense for most companies.

4) Five factors to consider in choice of transporation arrangement by Management:

  1. Potential for Goods Demage

The key factors that influence the potential for demage to Goods include movement and acceleration forces. Frieght Containers experiance the greatest acceleration forces during handling at the terminal or depot and during transfering rail yards.

2. Transit Time

A study conducted transit time between sydney and perth found the average door to door transit time for each of the following transport modes:

Road = 2-4 days

Rail = 7 Days

Maritime =10-14 days

Accordingly one can plan its mode for transporation and plan accordingly.

3. Cost of Transport

Here the cost include Fuel, manforce, accidents, vehicle and equipment maintenence, regulatory complinaces, accidents, profitability targets, and market share.

4. Fuel Efficiency

In a New Zealand study, Maritime Frieght transport was found to be slightly more efficient in fuel consumption and CO emissions when compared to rail. Meanwhile both Maritime and rail transport modes surpoassed the fuel efficiency of road transport by around 50%.

To acheive this efficieny, however, 500 containers would need to be transported per maritime vessel and 40 containers per train.

5. Levels of Safety

According to Safe Work Australia, road freight transport accounts for the majority of serious claims and fatalities in Australia's transport, postal and warehousing industries.

More specifically, Trucks -which make up only 2.5 % Vehicle on road, contributed to around 20% of all road fatalities in Australia.

Having reviewed the Five factors of mode choice, there are some clear benefits and deficiences with each transporation mode:

Least potential for Good Demage Maritime - Yes Rail - no
Efficient Transit Time Road - Yes Maritime - no
Cost Savings Maritime - Yes Rail - no
Efficiency in Fuel consumption Maritime - Yes Road - no
Safety Air and space transport- Yes Road - no

Thank you.


Related Solutions

Portsmouth Corporation, a British corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Salem Corporation, a U.S. corporation....
Portsmouth Corporation, a British corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Salem Corporation, a U.S. corporation. During the year, Portsmouth reported the following income: $250,000 interest income received from a loan to an unrelated French corporation. $100,000 dividend income received from a less than 1 percent owned unrelated Dutch corporation. $150,000 rent income from an unrelated British corporation on property Portsmouth actively manages. $500,000 gross profit from the sale of inventory manufactured by Portsmouth in Great Britain and sold to...
If a company is a wholly owned subsidiary is there any NCI, if so how do...
If a company is a wholly owned subsidiary is there any NCI, if so how do you find it?
On April 1, 2020, Republic Company sold equipment to its wholly owned subsidiary, Barre Corporation, for...
On April 1, 2020, Republic Company sold equipment to its wholly owned subsidiary, Barre Corporation, for $40,000. At the time of the transfer, the asset had an original cost (to Republic) of $60,000 and accumulated depreciation of $25,000. The equipment has a five year estimated remaining life. Barre reported net income of $250,000, $270,000 and $310,000 in 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. Republic received dividends from Barre of $90,000, $105,000 and $120,000 for 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. What was...
The separate condensed balance sheets of Patrick Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sean Corporation, are as...
The separate condensed balance sheets of Patrick Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sean Corporation, are as follows: BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2020 Patrick Sean Cash $ 76,000 $ 74,000 Accounts receivable (net) 144,000 22,000 Inventories 84,000 74,000 Plant and equipment (net) 622,000 266,000 Investment in Sean 456,000 - Total assets $ 1,382,000 $ 436,000 Accounts payable 160,000 88,000 Long-term debt 100,000 34,000 Common stock ($10 par) 326,000 50,000 Additional paid-in capital 14,000 Retained earnings 796,000 250,000 Total liabilities and shareholders'...
The separate condensed balance sheets of Patrick Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sean Corporation, are...
The separate condensed balance sheets of Patrick Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sean Corporation, are as follows: BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2017 Patrick Sean Cash $ 80,000 $ 56,000 Accounts receivable (net) 140,000 40,000 Inventories 88,000 50,000 Plant and equipment (net) 624,000 260,000 Investment in Sean 474,000 - Total assets $ 1,406,000 $ 406,000 Accounts payable 178,000 98,000 Long-term debt 100,000 34,000 Common stock ($10 par) 338,000 80,000 Additional paid-in capital 8,000 Retained earnings 790,000 186,000 Total liabilities and...
USAco, a domestic corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FORco, a foreign corporation. USAco's only assets...
USAco, a domestic corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FORco, a foreign corporation. USAco's only assets are cash of $200,000, accounts receivable of $200,000 and its U.S. manufacturing plant worth $500,000. USAco has no liabilities. Assume that there is no intangible value in USAco and that the manufacturing plant is a USRPI. During the current year, FORco sells all of its shares of USAco to an unrelated U.S.person. Is FORco's sale of stock in USAco subject to withholding under FIRPTA?...
The separate condensed balance sheets of Patrick Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sean Corporation, are...
The separate condensed balance sheets of Patrick Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sean Corporation, are as follows: BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2017 Patrick Sean Cash $ 70,000 $ 56,000 Accounts receivable (net) 144,000 30,000 Inventories 100,000 42,000 Plant and equipment (net) 628,000 260,000 Investment in Sean 440,000 - Total assets $ 1,382,000 $ 388,000 Accounts payable 170,000 98,000 Long-term debt 102,000 22,000 Common stock ($10 par) 340,000 62,000 Additional paid-in capital 14,000 Retained earnings 770,000 192,000 Total liabilities and...
A Singaporean operation is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Australian company which regards the operation...
A Singaporean operation is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Australian company which regards the operation as a long term investment, and thus takes no part in the day to day decision making of the operation. The operation purchases parts from various Australian manufacturers for assembly by Singaporean labour. The finished product is exported to a number of countries but Singapore is still the major market. Consequently, sales price is dominated by competition within Singapore and follows the local regulations...
A Singaporean operation is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Australian company which regards the operation...
A Singaporean operation is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Australian company which regards the operation as a long term investment, and thus takes no part in the day to day decision making of the operation. The operation purchases parts from various Australian manufacturers for assembly by Singaporean labour. The finished product is exported to a number of countries but Singapore is still the major market. Consequently, sales price is dominated by competition within Singapore and follows the local regulations...
USAco is a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of ForCo, a foreign corporation. USAco's only assets are cash...
USAco is a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of ForCo, a foreign corporation. USAco's only assets are cash of $400,000, accounts receivable of $400,000, and its U.S. manufacturing plant with a value of $1 million. In addition, USAco has carried a mortgage on the manufacturing plant of $600,000 for the last 10 years. ForCo sells its shares to a buyer for $1,800,000. Which of the following best describes the tax implications? Question 20 options: 1) The buyer does not have to withhold....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT