Question

Aunt G is one of your department supervisors with responsibility for 10 employees. She is relatively new to this position and comes to you for advice on how to effectively lead her subordinates. Her subordinates are a mixed bag; some newly hired college grads and some who have been with the company for a long time. You decide a good way to help her is to teach her how to determine what style(s) of leadership she should use by applying one of the Contingency/Situational theories.

2. Which Contingency Model you are applying?

3. Using the components and terminology of the chosen model, briefly list and explain to Aunt G each component. (Note: each contingency model has multiple components that need to be explained in order to understand the structure of the model, so be thorough.) List and describe (what do they mean?) all components separately and label … A. …. B. …. C. … , etc.

4. Again, using the components and terminology of the chosen model and identified in #3, explain to Aunt G how she could apply the components to figure out what leadership behaviors she should use.

Answer 1

Contingency model provides extensive availability of opportunities for an organisation to understand its requirements as well as to increase their adaptability in their respective operating segment. This type of implementation provides availability of determine the leadership styles engineering program in the respective environment.

Some advantages of contingency style of leadership are as follows
• It is Prescriptive
It provides inability to the managers to effectively manage several variables according to their needs. This model provides a number of factors that affect efficiency of the group it provides a basic ability of task oriented leader that can affect the group as long and the group is highly structure as well as have a clearly defined task.
• Research and expertise
This specific theory is based on very intense research as well as it is curated by some of the best experts of this field. Best intense research contributes into the seriousness of the theory and also provides a very thick base for examination as well as leadership.
• Leader identification
Best style gives ability to an organisations for easily identify the best potential leader for a particular group. Best style provide and specific identity of the leader who can leave their coworkers to achieve the main goal set for the group. Leaders with the relationship orientation get easy use their interpersonal skills for providing the better efficiency in the jobs and can be very helpful in dealing with the complex situations when making the decisions.
• Flexibility
This type of leadership style is very flexible fodder crops. It gives an ability to the leader for precisely adopting a very wide variety of groups. Leaders and group relationships can also be very much improved by this specific leadership style. For example if the leadership is very low on its human relations skills this a specific leadership style provide an ability via the management to create ineffective groups by providing clear and define task which increases the overall ability of the leader to provide reward or punishment to their participants.

Advantages and limitations of this style are as follows
• Insufficient literature
This efficient leadership style suffers from Insufficient literature. It cannot be used to expel various type of actions which can be taken under different situations. Approach has to be very clear and princess to be processed by this leadership style. It increases the need of a skilled manager in the processes.
• Complexity
In this specific leadership style the suggestion for the approach is very simple. But managing the situation is very complex. Managers have to take multiple decisions according to their leadership style by maintaining the contingency of the given task. Managers are always short of time and this specific leadership style overloads them with the information and this is usually resulted in less efficient work structure.
• Difficulty in testing
Agency leadership style is very complex and it always creates problem in texting. Because of the too many factors involved this the specific leadership style is very hard to examine.
• Reactive not Proactive
Contingency leadership style is basically very reactive in its nature. It defines what managers can do in the given situation for a specific organisation. Managers are always responsible to manage the environment by avoiding the undesirable effects.

P.S. - Please use separate threads to ask multiple question at a time.