Of all the times this hard drive could crash, it had to be now,
” Marcy cried. “How can I finish the June financial reports without
all the information? I knew I should have backed up the disk last
night before I left work.” News of the disaster traveled quickly
through the office, and people began to stop by her cubicle to
offer their help.
John was the first to the rescue. “It
might not be as bad as you think, Marcy. I have the financial
reports from May right here. According to the balance sheet, we had
a total inventory of $99,000 at the end of May. And I remember that
the Finished Goods Inventory was one-third of that amount.”
“I just finished the inventory counts
last night,” Peter chimed in from across the hall. “According to my
tally sheets, we finished June with $80,000 in Direct Materials
Inventory, $52,000 in Work in Process Inventory, and $25,000 in
Finished Goods Inventory. This was a 100% increase from the
balances in Direct Materials Inventory and Work in Process
Inventory at the end of May. I bet with a little more investigative
work, we can get all the numbers you need to complete the
reports.”
Sally called from Payroll to tell
Marcy that the company had paid a total of $36,000 for direct labor
during June. Juan, the billing supervisor, e-mailed Marcy that the
company had sent out invoices to customers totaling $291,000.
Marcy knew that the overhead rate was
200% of direct labor costs. She also knew that the company priced
its product using a 50% markup on the cost of goods sold. Armed
with all this information, she sat down to reconstruct the
inventory accounts for June.
1. Begininng finished goods:
2. Beginning direct materials:
3. Beginning work in process:
4. Cost of goods sold:
5. Cost of goods manufactured
6. Direct material used:
7. Purchases:
8. Direct labor:
9. overhead:
In: Accounting
In 2017, your client, Clear Corporation, changed from the cash to the accrual method of accounting for its radio station. The company had a positive § 481 adjustment of $2.4 million as a result of the change and began amortizing the adjustment in 2017. In 2018, Clear received an offer to sell the assets of the radio station business (this would be considered a sale of a trade or business under §1060). If the offer is accepted, Clear plans to purchase a satellite television business. Clear has asked you to explain the consequences of the sale of the radio station on the amortization of the §481 adjustment.
In: Accounting
In: Accounting
Before her death, Lucy entered into the following transactions. Discuss the estate and income tax ramifications of each of these transactions.
A. Lucy borrowed $600,000 from her brother, Irwin, so that Lucy could start a business. The loan was on open account, and no interest or due date was provided for. Under applicable state law, collection on the loan was barred by the statute of limitations before Lucy died. Because the family thought that Irwin should recover his funds, the executor of the estate paid him $600,000.
B. Lucy promised her sister, Ida, a bequest of $500,000 if Ida would move in with her and care for her during an illness (which eventually proved to be terminal). Lucy never kept her promise, as her will was silent on any bequest to Ida. After Lucy’s death, Ida sued the estate and eventually recovered $600,000 for breach of contract.
C. Before her death, Lucy incurred and paid certain medical expenses but did not have the opportunity to file a claim for recovery from her insurance company. After her death, the claim was filed by Lucy’s executor, and the reimbursement was paid to the estate.
In: Accounting
3. A partially completed pension spreadsheet showing the relationships among the elements that constitute Carney, Inc.’s defined benefit pension plan follows. At the end of 2018, Carney revised its pension formula and incurred a prior service cost of $100 million. At the end of 2019, the pension formula was amended again, creating an additional prior service cost of $200 million. At the beginning of 2020, $400 million prior service cost was incurred. At the beginning of 2021, $300 million prior service cost was incurred. In 2018 - 2021, the actuary’s discount rate remained 10%, and the average remaining service life of the active employee group remained 10 years. The expected rate of return on assets was 10% in 2019, and increased by 1% each year.
|
2021 Pension spreadsheet ($ in millions) |
(PBO) |
Plan Assets |
Prior Service Cost–AOCI |
Net Loss (Gain) –AOCI |
Pension Expense |
Cash |
Net Pension (Liability) / Asset |
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2021 |
2,224 |
||||||
|
Service cost |
(1,095) |
||||||
|
Interest cost |
|||||||
|
Prior Service Cost |
|||||||
|
Expected return on assets |
|||||||
|
Adjust for: Gain (loss) on assets |
|||||||
|
Amortization of: "Prior service cost-AOCI" |
|||||||
|
Amortization of: "Net Loss (Gain)-AOCI" |
|||||||
|
Gain (Loss) on PBO |
|||||||
|
Cash funding |
1,300 |
||||||
|
Retiree benefits |
1,200 |
(1,200) |
|||||
|
Bal., Dec. 31, 2021 |
442 |
3,176 |
2020 Spreadsheet
| 2020 Pension spreadsheet ($ in millions) | (PBO) | Plan Assets | Prior Service Cost–AOCI | Net Loss (Gain) –AOCI | Pension Expense | Cash | Net Pension (Liability) / Asset |
| Balance, Jan. 1, 2020 | -20550 | 22450 | 290 | -3100 | 1,900 | ||
| Service cost | -900 | 900 | -900 | ||||
| Interest cost | -2095 | 2095 | -2095 | ||||
| Prior Service Cost | -400 | 400 | -400 | ||||
| Expected return on assets | 2,470 | -2,470 | 2,470 | ||||
| Adjust for: Gain (loss) on assets | 449 | -449 | 449 | ||||
| Amortization of: "Prior service cost-AOCI" | -29 | 29 | |||||
| Amortization of: "Net Loss (Gain)-AOCI" | -105 | 105 | |||||
| Gain (Loss) on PBO | -400 | 400 | -400 | ||||
| Cash funding | 1200 | -1,200 | 1,200 | ||||
| Retiree benefits | 1,100 | -1100 | |||||
| Bal., Dec. 31, 2020 | -23245 | 25469 | 661 | -3254 | 659 | 2,224 |
In: Accounting
|
Sales |
$5,654,400 |
||
|
Cost of goods sold |
3,618,816 |
||
|
Gross profit |
$2,035,584 |
||
|
Expenses: |
|||
|
Selling expenses |
$984,000 |
||
|
Administrative expenses |
430,000 |
||
|
Total expenses |
1,414,000 |
||
|
Income from operations |
$ 621,584 |
The division of costs between variable and fixed is as follows: (round to nearest dollar)
|
Variable |
Fixed |
|||
|
Cost of goods sold |
70% |
30% |
||
|
Selling expenses |
20% |
80% |
||
|
Administrative expenses |
10% |
90% |
||
Management is planning to increase the unit sales price by $3 each, no change to the variable cost, but adding additional fixed cost of $25,000.
In: Accounting
A partially completed pension spreadsheet showing the relationships among the elements that constitute Carney, Inc.’s defined benefit pension plan follows. At the end of 2018, Carney revised its pension formula and incurred a prior service cost of $100 million. At the end of 2019, the pension formula was amended again, creating an additional prior service cost of $200 million. At the beginning of 2020, $400 million prior service cost was incurred. At the beginning of 2021, $300 million prior service cost was incurred. In 2018 - 2021, the actuary’s discount rate remained 10%, and the average remaining service life of the active employee group remained 10 years. The expected rate of return on assets was 10% in 2019, and increased by 1% each year.
|
2019 Pension spreadsheet ($ in millions) |
(PBO) |
Plan Assets |
Prior Service Cost–AOCI |
Net Loss (Gain) –AOCI |
Pension Expense |
Cash |
Net Pension (Liability) / Asset |
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2019 |
(25,000) |
20,000 |
100 |
4,500 |
(5,000) |
||
|
Service cost |
(800) |
800 |
(800) |
||||
|
Interest cost |
(2,500) |
2,500 |
(2,500) |
||||
|
Prior Service Cost |
(200) |
200 |
(200) |
||||
|
Expected return on assets |
2,000 |
(2,000) |
2,000 |
||||
|
Adjust for: Gain (loss) on assets |
400 |
(400) |
400 |
||||
|
Amortization of: "Prior service cost-AOCI" |
(10) |
10 |
|||||
|
Amortization of: "Net Loss (Gain)-AOCI" |
(200) |
200 |
|||||
|
Gain (Loss) on PBO |
7000 |
(7,000) |
7,000 |
||||
|
Cash funding |
1,000 |
(1,000) |
1,000 |
||||
|
Retiree benefits |
950 |
(950) |
|||||
|
Bal., Dec. 31, 2019 |
(20,550) |
22,450 |
290 |
(3,100) |
1,510 |
1,900 |
In: Accounting
Fred currently earns $9,000 per month. Fred has been offered the chance to transfer for three to five years to an overseas affiliate. His employer is willing to pay Fred $10,000 per month if he accepts the assignment. Assume that the maximum foreign-earned income exclusion for next year is $104,100.
a-1. How much U.S. gross income will Fred report if he accepts the assignment abroad on January 1 of next year and works overseas for the entire year?
a-2. If Fred’s employer also provides him free housing abroad (cost of $20,000), how much of the $20,000 is excludable from Fred’s income?
b. Suppose that Fred's employer has offered Fred a six-month overseas assignment beginning on January 1 of next year. How much U.S. gross income will Fred report next year if he accepts the six-month assignment abroad and returns home on July 1 of next year?
c-1. Suppose that Fred’s employer offers Fred a permanent
overseas assignment beginning on March 1 of next year. How much
U.S. gross income will Fred report next year if he accepts the
permanent assignment abroad? Assume that Fred will be abroad for
305 days out of 365 days next year. (Do not round intermediate
calculations. Round your final answer to the nearest whole dollar
amount.)
c-2. If Fred’s employer also provides him free
housing abroad (cost of $16,000 next year), how much of the $16,000
is excludable from Fred’s income? Assume that Fred will be abroad
for 305 days out of 365 days next year. (Use 365 days in a
year. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final
answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
In: Accounting
7 Simple Steps to Corporate Fraud Prevention: A Case Study
Evidence of internal theft shines a bright light in the rear-view mirror. Posted by Chris Hamilton on September 6th, 2012
The shock when a victim discovers that a trusted employee – and even a friend – has stolen from him or her is absolute. It’s a feeling of betrayal and violation that strikes fear in some, grief in others and anger in most.
In my experience, it is almost always accompanied by a sense that the victim should have known it was going on. The evidence of theft sheds a bright light in the rear-view mirror. Patterns and circumstances take on a clarity that contemporaneous experience obscured. Sometimes the clarity was there but for a variety of reasons it was ignored.
A Case Study
The internal fraud was revealed, he felt stupid for allowing it to happen and the lesson cost him several hundred thousands of dollars in uninsured losses.
A victim uncovered theft when his bookkeeper unexpectedly missed a few days of work and he opened a bank statement. The simple act of thumbing through cancelled checks from one month’s bank statement prompted a phone call to his attorney who directed him to a forensic accountant. The internal fraud was revealed, he felt stupid for allowing it to happen and the lesson cost him several hundred thousands of dollars in uninsured losses.
The forensic accountant uncovered evidence of a simple but effective embezzlement scheme. The bookkeeper had set up vendors that were very similar to existing real vendors. For example, if the real vendor was ABC Service Company then a fake vendor was established called ABC Service Co. The bookkeeper set up bank accounts for the fake vendors. That was the hard part. The rest was easy. The business owner signed hundreds of checks to the fake vendors thinking the checks went to legitimate business activity.
Since that worked so well, the bookkeeper began forging checks to pay the vendors, personal expenses, and provide cash gifts to family and friends. And, since all that worked without detection by the business owner, the bookkeeper took an unauthorized increase in salary.
It was bold. It was also easily discovered and should have been easily prevented. The bookkeeper was quickly arrested and has spent time in jail.
Fraud Prevention 101
The following are fraud prevention steps that were ignored and could have prevented the theft:
All of the steps above were recognized by the business owner in this case: “I knew something wasn’t right. I should have known this was happening.” That is never good after the fact.
Please let us know whether you agree or disagree with the article below
In: Accounting
Waterloo Co. sells product P-14 at a price of $48 a unit. The per-unit cost data are direct materials $15, direct labour $10, and overhead $12 (75% variable). Waterloo Co. has sufficient capacity to accept a special order for 40,000 units, but at a discount of 10% from the regular price. Selling costs associated with this order would be $3 per unit. There are no selling costs on its regular orders.
a) Should Waterloo Co. should accept the special order? Show your calculations.
b) Assume the same information as part a) except that Waterloo has no excess capacity. Indicate the net income (loss) that Waterloo would realize by accepting the special order.
c) Assume the information in part b) except that the company could rent the special purpose machine that is required for this order for $100,000. This would allow the company to fulfill its regular orders and this special order on a one time basis.
1. Should the company go ahead and rent this machine and accept the special order?
2. What is the highest price the company can afford to pay to rent the machine to be indifferent as to whether to accept the special order or not. d) List two qualitative considerations that management should consider in deciding whether to accept this offer beyond its immediate impact on profits.
d. List two qualitative considerations that management should consider in deciding whether to accept this offer beyond its immediate impact on profits.
In: Accounting
Towing Company employs a periodic inventory system and sells its inventory to customers for $34 per unit. Towing Company had the following inventory information available for the month of May: May 1 Beginning inventory 2,200 units @ $17 cost per unit May 8 Sold 1,700 units May 13 Purchased 1,800 units @ $13 cost per unit May 18 Sold 1,600 units May 21 Purchased 1,300 units @ $23 cost per unit May 22 Purchased 1,100 units @ $15 cost per unit May 28 Sold 1,300 units May 30 Purchased 1,600 units @ $10 cost per unit During May, Towing Company reported operating expenses of $49,000 and had an income tax rate of 32%. Calculate the dollar amount of ending inventory shown on Towing Company's May 31 balance sheet using the weighted average method.
In: Accounting
The Sendai Co., Ltd., of Japan has budgeted costs in its various departments as follows for the coming year:
| Factory Administration | $ | 819,840 |
| Custodial Services | 98,337 | |
| Personnel | 26,358 | |
| Maintenance | 170,555 | |
| Machining—overhead | 1,126,484 | |
| Assembly—overhead | 618,226 | |
| Total cost | $ | 2,859,800 |
The company allocates service department costs to other departments in the order listed below.
| Department | Number of Employees |
Total Labor- Hours |
Square Feet of Space Occupied |
Direct Labor- Hours |
Machine- Hours |
| Factory Administration | 30 | — | 5,300 | — | — |
| Custodial Services | 11 | 15,900 | 10,200 | — | — |
| Personnel | 16 | 19,300 | 7,700 | — | — |
| Maintenance | 53 | 47,600 | 12,200 | — | — |
| Machining | 92 | 60,000 | 60,000 | 118,000 | 176,250 |
| Assembly | 138 | 150,000 | 20,000 | 203,000 | 105,750 |
| 340 | 292,800 | 115,400 | 321,000 | 282,000 | |
Machining and Assembly are operating departments; the other
departments are service departments. Factory Administration is
allocated based on labor-hours; Custodial Services based on square
feet occupied; Personnel based on number of employees; and
Maintenance based on machine-hours.
Required:
1. Allocate service department costs to consuming departments by the step-down method. Then compute predetermined overhead rates in the operating departments using machine-hours as the allocation base in Machining and direct labor-hours as the allocation base in Assembly.
2. Repeat (1) above, this time using the direct method. Again compute predetermined overhead rates in Machining and Assembly.
3. Assume that the company doesn’t bother with allocating service department costs but simply computes a single plantwide overhead rate that divides the total overhead costs (both service department and operating department costs) by the total direct labor-hours. Compute the plantwide overhead rate.
4. Suppose a job requires machine and labor time as follows:
| Machine- Hours |
Direct Labor-Hours |
||||
| Machining Department | 260 | 32 | |||
| Assembly Department | 18 | 84 | |||
| Total hours | 278 | 116 | |||
Using the overhead rates computed in (1), (2), and (3) above, compute the amount of overhead cost that would be assigned to the job if the overhead rates were developed using the step-down method, the direct method, and the plantwide method.
In: Accounting
The advent of Corporate Governance & Compliance and business ethics represented a major change in the way that senior leadership manages corporate operations. Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, and other legislation have been enacted there is a concerted effort to bring transparency, accountability, and ethical behavior back into the market place. Discuss the effects these laws and regulations involving Corporate Governance, Corporate Compliance and business ethics activities on: corporate leadership, stockholders and stakeholders in the corporation and our economy. (Please type answer)
In: Accounting
Please visit www.irs.gov and answer the following: 1) What percentage of bankruptcy petitions does the IRS estimate contain some kind of fraud? 2) What are the major goals of the CI division’s bankruptcy fraud program? 3) Read two or three examples of bankruptcy fraud and discuss.
In: Accounting
Ironwood Company
manufactures a variety of sunglasses. Production information for
its most popular line, the Clear Vista (CV),
follows:
| Per Unit | |||||
| Sales price | $ | 51.50 | |||
| Direct materials | 20.00 | ||||
| Direct labor | 10.00 | ||||
| Variable manufacturing overhead | 6.00 | ||||
| Fixed manufacturing overhead | 5.00 | ||||
| Total manufacturing cost | $ | 41.00 | |||
Suppose that Ironwood has been approached about producing a special
order for 2,800 units of custom CV sunglasses for a new
semiprofessional volleyball league. All units in the special order
would be produced in the league’s signature colors with a specially
designed logo emblem attached to the side of the glasses. The
league has offered to pay $49.00 per unit in the special order.
Additional costs for the special order total $3.00 per unit for
mixing the special frame color and purchasing the emblem with the
league’s logo that will be attached to the
glasses.
Required:
1. Assume Ironwood has the idle capacity necessary to
accommodate the special order. Calculate the additional
contribution margin Ironwood would make by accepting the special
order.
2-a. Calculate the current contribution margin per
unit. (Round your answer to 2 decimal
places.)
2-b. Suppose Ironwood is currently operating its
production facility at full capacity and accepting the special
order would mean reducing production of its regular CV model.
Should Ironwood accept the special order in this case?
| Yes | |
| No |
3. Calculate the special order price per unit at
which Ironwood is indifferent between accepting or rejecting the
special order. (Round your answer to 2
decimal places.)
In: Accounting