Question

Many historical analyses assume technological determinism, but is it not more truthful to say that social invention is more important to historical change than technological invention?

please answer in 500 words.

Answer 1

Technological determinants Seek out the development of media or technology techniques, in general, as important drivers of history and social change. This is a theory signed by "hyperglobalists" that claims that because of the widespread availability of technology, the push for globalization is inevitable. Thus, technological development and innovation become key drivers of social, economic or political change.

Strict proponents of technology determinants do not believe that the impact of technology differs depending on how much technology or use is available. Instead of looking at technology as part of a larger spectrum of human activities, technology settings see technology as the basis for all human activities.

The determinants of technology are summarized as "belief in technology as an important control force in society." The idea that technological development determines social change. It changes the way people think and communicate with others and can be described as a logical proposition in three words: "history-defining technology". The belief is that social progress is driven by technological innovation which in turn follows the "inevitable." The "concept of progress" or "doctrine of progress" focuses on the idea that social problems can be addressed through technological progress and that is how society moves forward. Technology determinists believe that "you can't stop progress, which means we can't control technology." This shows that we have no power and that society allows technology to manage social change because “the society fails to realize the value alternatives in it.

Technology determinants are defined as a method that defines technology or technological progress as an essential element of the process of social change. When technology is stable, its design tends to determine consumer behavior by reducing human agency. However, this position ignores the social and cultural circumstances in which technology is created. Social science expert Claude Fischer identified the most well-known technology as baseball, in which technology was seen as an external force introduced into social situations that created the effects of the recovery.

Instead of recognizing how society or culture interacts and shapes the way technology is used, technology defines technology as "the use of technology is largely determined by the structure of the technology itself - its function follows." Its form ”. There is confusion with Daniel Chandler's "inevitable theory" that when technology is integrated into culture, what is the inevitable development of that technology.

For example, we can consider why novels are so prominent in our society when compared to other forms of novels, such as discoverers or Western novels. We can say that this is due to the creation of a perfect connection system developed by the publisher. The glue is used here instead of the time and costly process of tying the book with individual signatures. This means that these books can be widely circulated. We would not be able to have literacy knowledge without mass production. This example is closely linked to Marshall McLuhan's belief that the press helped create the nation state. This changed the society from oral culture to literate culture, but it also showed a capitalist society where different caste and individuality existed.

Therefore, computer and television printers are not just transmitters. It is a metaphor in which we formulate practical ideas one way or another. They will classify the world for us, they will define it, they will highlight it, expand it, they will reduce it, they will prove what it is. By comparing these media, we do not see the world as it is. We see our code system. This is the power of information forms.