Question

In: Economics

Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm earns zero economic profit in the long run and show...

Explain why a monopolistically competitive firm earns zero economic profit in the long run and show graphically how they charge a higher price then perfectly competitive firms and are not cost efficient.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans) In monopolistic competition there are many sellers selling homogeneous but differentiated products. The element of selling differentiated products enables the seller to charge higher. The product can be differentiated in terms of quality or design or effectiveness. For eg- Gucci charges a lot higher than other brands selling similar products due to product differentiation.

Further, the barrier to entry in this market is low. This enable the firms to enter the market easily. If in short run, firms in the market earn positive economic profit, more firms will enter the market. This will increase the supply and competition and prices will drop. Therefore in long run, firms will earn zero economic profit.

Oppositely, if firms short run earn negative economic profit, some firms will leave the market, which will increase the price and firms will again come to a point where they earn zero economic profit.

Furthermore, monopolistic markets are inefficient because they charge higher and sell less quantity than socially desirable.

Monopolistic firm produces the quantity where MR and MC curve intersect and then charges the price on demand curve. And hence the price is a lot higher than the marginal cost.

Whereas in competitive markets, price is equal to marginal revenue and the quantity produced is more.


Related Solutions

Does a monopolistically-competitive firm have zero economic profits in the long run? Why or why not?...
Does a monopolistically-competitive firm have zero economic profits in the long run? Why or why not? How might it be different from perfect competition in the long run?
A monopolistically competitive firm in long-run equilibrium: will make negative profit. will make zero profit. will...
A monopolistically competitive firm in long-run equilibrium: will make negative profit. will make zero profit. will make positive profit. Any of the above are possible. None of the above are possible. The Cournot model of symmetric duopoly suggests that the market equilibrium position is such that: one firm is larger than the other in the final equilibrium and the largest firm produces the largest quantity of output. economic profits are zero for both firms. total industry output is the same...
When a purely competitive firm earns a normal economic total profit in the long run, it...
When a purely competitive firm earns a normal economic total profit in the long run, it produces a quantity Q of its final product where $Price = $Marginal Cost and also $Price = Minimum Average Total Cost. Why are these price and cost equalities considered to be beneficial for the entire economy?
why do competitive firms earn zero economic profit in the long run
why do competitive firms earn zero economic profit in the long run
28. Suppose that a monopolistically competitive firm has an economic profit in the short run. in...
28. Suppose that a monopolistically competitive firm has an economic profit in the short run. in the long run, its economic profit will be zero. In the transition from short run to long run, which curve moved which way? Group of answer choices The ATC curve shifted down. The demand curve shifted left. The ATC curve shifted up. The demand curve shifted right. 29. The criterion for efficiency from the firm perspective is if the firm minimizes _______. The criterion...
In the long-run equilibrium, a monopolistically competitive organisation makes zero profit because: Select one: a. marginal...
In the long-run equilibrium, a monopolistically competitive organisation makes zero profit because: Select one: a. marginal revenue will equal marginal cost b. price will equal marginal cost c. marginal cost intersects the minimum of average total cost d. price will equal average total cost
Why is there no economic profit for perfectly competitive firms in the long run? Why is...
Why is there no economic profit for perfectly competitive firms in the long run? Why is there no economic loss? Answer this question by using an example of a market or industry where perfectly competitive or close to perfectly competitive firms operate (or run their businesses) in close to 'no economic profit or no economic loss' situation.
In the long-run equilibrium, all firms in a perfectly competitive market earn zero economic profit. Explain...
In the long-run equilibrium, all firms in a perfectly competitive market earn zero economic profit. Explain why this is true using intuition and graphs.
Assume a firm in a monopolistically competitive industry is currently making a short run positive economic profit.
Assume a firm in a monopolistically competitive industry is currently making a short run positive economic profit. Describe what is likely to happen to this firm's profit in the long run. What role does elasticity play in this story?
Illustrate a typical monopolistically competitive firm in short- run equilibrium with economic profit. How will demand,...
Illustrate a typical monopolistically competitive firm in short- run equilibrium with economic profit. How will demand, average cost and profit change in the long run? Explain. Will the firm achieve minimum efficient scale? Explain. What is the source of the firm’s market power?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT