In: Finance
River Kisigo flows through an area next to a medium sized city into river Rufiji. During recent years, annual floods have damaged homes in its vicinity at an increased' rate. Average annual flood damages have been estimated to be Tshs 180M at present and are expected to increase by Tshs 12M each year. To contain excessive runoff two proposals have been made. One is to do some channel improvement (CI). Another proposal is to build a storage dam and small reservoir (D&R). Initial cost of CI is Tshs 240M and annual maintenance is expected to be Tshs 18M. Initial cost of D&R is Tshs 960M, annual operation and maintenance is estimated to be Tshs 27M. If the CI is made, average annual flood damages are expected to be Tshs 108M at present and to increase by Tshs 7.2M each year. If the D&R is built, average annual flood damages are expected to be reduced to Tshs 18M at present and to increase by Tshs 3M each year. The D&R will remove certain land from agriculture and possible future development. This dis-benefit, valued at Tshs 20M per year, is partially offset by improved recreational fishing valued at Tshs 10M per year. Using an interest rate of 12% and benefit /cost analysis establish which proposal should be chosen. Make your own assumptions regarding the classification of costs and benefits/consequences.
ASSUMPTION: | |||||||||||||||||
CONSIDER 12YEAR HORIZON OF THE ANALYSIS | |||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS OF CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT (CI) | |||||||||||||||||
Discount Rate=12%=0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
N | Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||||
A | Average annual flood damage without CI | 180 | 192 | 204 | 216 | 228 | 240 | 252 | 264 | 276 | 288 | 300 | 312 | ||||
B | Average annual flood damage WITH CI | 108 | 115.2 | 122.4 | 129.6 | 136.8 | 144 | 151.2 | 158.4 | 165.6 | 172.8 | 180 | 187.2 | ||||
C=A-B | Annual Benefit | 72 | 76.8 | 81.6 | 86.4 | 91.2 | 96 | 100.8 | 105.6 | 110.4 | 115.2 | 120 | 124.8 | ||||
D | Annual Maintenance | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||||
E=C-D | Net Annual Benefit | 54 | 58.8 | 63.6 | 68.4 | 73.2 | 78 | 82.8 | 87.6 | 92.4 | 97.2 | 102 | 106.8 | SUM | |||
PW=E/(1.12^N) | Present Worth of Benefit | 48.2143 | 46.8750 | 45.2692 | 43.4694 | 41.5356 | 39.5172 | 37.4545 | 35.3802 | 33.3204 | 31.2958 | 29.3226 | 27.4129 | 459.0671 | |||
Present Worth Total Benefits | 459.0671 | ||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | 240 | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit Cost Ratio | 1.912779719 | ||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS OF STORAGE DAM & RESERVOIR (D&R) | |||||||||||||||||
Discount Rate=12%=0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
N | Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||||
A | Average annual flood damage without CI | 180 | 192 | 204 | 216 | 228 | 240 | 252 | 264 | 276 | 288 | 300 | 312 | ||||
B | Average annual flood damage WITH CI | 18 | 21 | 24 | 27 | 30 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 42 | 45 | 48 | 51 | ||||
C=A-B | Annual Benefit | 162 | 171 | 180 | 189 | 198 | 207 | 216 | 225 | 234 | 243 | 252 | 261 | ||||
D | Annual Maintenance | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | ||||
E | Net Disbenefit for removal of land development(20-10) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||
F=C-D-E | Net Annual Benefit | 125 | 134 | 143 | 152 | 161 | 170 | 179 | 188 | 197 | 206 | 215 | 224 | SUM | |||
PW=E/(1.12^N) | Present Worth of Benefit | 111.6071 | 106.8240 | 101.7846 | 96.5987 | 91.3557 | 86.1273 | 80.9705 | 75.9300 | 71.0402 | 66.3265 | 61.8074 | 57.4952 | 1007.8673 | |||
Present Worth Total Benefits | 1007.8673 | ||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost | 960 | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit Cost Ratio | 1.049861731 | ||||||||||||||||
CHANNELIMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE CHOSEN | |||||||||||||||||
It has higher Benefit/Cost Ratio | |||||||||||||||||