In: Operations Management
Watch the film The Corporation
Do you think the film's warnings of the dangers of corporate power are accurate or exaggerated? Explain why.
Answer :
The corporation movies look at how corporations (mainly in the USA) have evolved historically; how the modern corporation has the laws of an individual; how corporate responsibility issues are addressed; and how citizens and communities react. Corporate influence also may raise inequality in wealth. The issues with corporate influence are addressed by diagnosing a company with a psychopathic personality disorder. We can not assure whether the corporate threat in the movie is real or exaggerated. But, Movie has lots of corporate problems rather than showing more solutions. Yes, .lots of cases are the truth and it talks about real problems with corporate.
It stresses that the people have taken each other indifferently. In every country, it's a concept and the nation can never be good. There is ignorance of the common good. It is an absurd way of doing things. We can not do our good if we neglect the common good and forget that the majority of people are in distress. All is interconnected throughout the network. The film focuses on how self-interest is driving natural resource exploitation and how it is hindering the country's economy. The link between politics and corporations and how they work against people has been illustrated here.
The film gives an idea of modern companies' immense power. Nevertheless, the studies have been conducted on what individuals, organizations and mass people's power could do to restrict or counter corporate activities ( e.g. change to sweat shopping, an end to privatized water in a city, a community limit on fast-food chains, etc.). From a DSM IV perspective, it focuses on psychopathy. The film is based on a scientific account of the impact and dissemination of the business mindset in the people. Various topics are discussed concerning companies and social responses. There were various perspectives – from corporate criticism, privatization advocates, and corporate leaders themselves. Some of the analysts were highly experienced in their regions. Furthermore, some audiences may find others to be more controversial (e.g., Michael Moore). Environmentalists, journalists, and académics were also interviewed. Nonetheless, certain competitive advantages can not be discussed and how economies of scale can be accomplished such that products such as the vaccine, food, and culture are easily created. Therefore, it is a simplistic description of the multiple causes that allow natural resources to be abused and focuses on various areas of the economy. The government has the power to act against corporations, it has been explained. The film is well-structured and keeps pace. Many case studies are interlaced and that works well – providing success stories with organizational responses.
** Kindly LIKE the answer.It will help and motivate us **