Question

In: Finance

The Masterson, Inc. is considering the purchase of a piece of equipment whose upfront cost is...

  1. The Masterson, Inc. is considering the purchase of a piece of equipment whose upfront cost is $65 million. The company estimates that the result of operating this equipment could go one of two ways: it could be highly successful and produce EBIT of $15 million in year one and that EBIT grows at 3.42% per year for nine more years; or it could be a poor performer and produce only $5 million in EBIT in year one and that will grow by only 2.12% per year over the remaining useful life of ten years. The machine will be depreciated on a straight line basis over its useful life down to a book value of $9 million. The expected salvage value of the machine at the end of year ten is $11 million. The company’s marginal tax rate is 25% and its RRR or WACC is 16%. The company assigns a 38% chance to success.
    1. Given the above information and based on static analysis, should the company go ahead with its investment?
    2. Upon further study the company realizes that, if the project proved to be underperforming by the end of year one, the company can stop production and sell the machine for a salvage value of $61 million. Given this information, should the company go ahead with the investment?
    3. What is the present value of the option to abandon?  

Solutions

Expert Solution

A. Possibility of Success = 38%. Therefore, possibility of failure = 62%.

If we draw a diagram of the success or failure it would look like below:

We need to find the cashflow for each of the options and then take a weighted average of the cashflow by multiplying them by the probabilities.

When it is static analysis, it means that once the decision is taken, the entire scenario - till year 10 cannot be changed.

Therefore, the cash flows for the 2 choices are presented below:

When company does well:

EBIT Growth 3.42%
Tax 25.00%
WACC 16.00%
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Investment                       (65)                     (59)              (54)              (48)              (43)              (37)              (31)              (26)              (20)              (15)                (9)
EBIT                       15           15.51           16.04           16.59           17.16           17.75           18.35           18.98           19.63           20.30
Depreciation 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Plus: Profit from Sale of Asset 2
PBT                         9                10                10                11                12                12                13                13                14                17
Tax                    2.35             2.48             2.61             2.75             2.89             3.04             3.19             3.35             3.51             4.18
PAT                    7.05             7.43             7.83             8.24             8.67             9.11             9.57           10.04           10.52           12.53
Plus: Depr 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Plus: Sale of Asset 9
Cash Flow                       (65)                  12.65           13.03           13.43           13.84           14.27           14.71           15.17           15.64           16.12           27.13
Discount Factor 1.000 0.862 0.743 0.641 0.552 0.476 0.410 0.354 0.305 0.263 0.227
NPV 5.20

when Company does not do well

EBIT Growth 2.12%
Tax 25.00%
WACC 16.00%
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Investment                       (65)                     (59)              (54)              (48)              (43)              (37)              (31)              (26)              (20)              (15)                (9)
EBIT                         5             5.11             5.21             5.32             5.44             5.55             5.67             5.79             5.91             6.04
Depreciation 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Plus: Profit from Sale of Asset 2
PBT                       (1)                (0)                (0)                (0)                (0)                (0)                  0                  0                  0                  2
Tax                  (0.15)           (0.12)           (0.10)           (0.07)           (0.04)           (0.01)             0.02             0.05             0.08             0.61
PAT                  (0.45)           (0.37)           (0.29)           (0.21)           (0.12)           (0.04)             0.05             0.14             0.24             1.83
Plus: Depr 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Plus: Sale of Asset 9
Cash Flow                       (65)                    5.15             5.23             5.31             5.39             5.48             5.56             5.65             5.74             5.84           16.43
Discount Factor 1.000 0.862 0.743 0.641 0.552 0.476 0.410 0.354 0.305 0.263 0.227
NPV -36.39

Therefore, taking the weighted NPV = 38% * 5.20 + 62%*-36.39 = - 20.58 Million. Based on Static Analysis the company SHOULD NOT go ahead with the project.

However, if the company stops the project when it goes bad in the first year, then the NPV for failure is as below:

EBIT Growth 2.12%
Tax 25.00%
WACC 16.00%
Year 0 1
Investment                       (65)                     (59)
EBIT                    5.00
Depreciation                    5.60
Plus: Profit from Sale of Asset                    2.00
PBT                    1.40
Tax                    0.35
PAT                    1.05
Plus: Depr 5.60
Plus: Sale of Asset 59.00
Cash Flow                       (65)                  65.65
Discount Factor 1.000 0.862
NPV -8.41

In this case, the weighted NPV = -3.23 Million

The value of the option = NPV with the Option - NPV without the option

= -3.23 + 20.58 = 17.24 Million

when Company does not do well

EBIT Growth 2.12%
Tax 25.00%
WACC 16.00%
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Investment                       (65)                     (59)              (54)              (48)              (43)              (37)              (31)              (26)              (20)              (15)                (9)
EBIT                         5             5.11             5.21             5.32             5.44             5.55             5.67             5.79             5.91             6.04
Depreciation 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Plus: Profit from Sale of Asset 2
PBT                       (1)                (0)                (0)                (0)                (0)                (0)                  0                  0                  0                  2
Tax                  (0.15)           (0.12)           (0.10)           (0.07)           (0.04)           (0.01)             0.02             0.05             0.08             0.61
PAT                  (0.45)           (0.37)           (0.29)           (0.21)           (0.12)           (0.04)             0.05             0.14             0.24             1.83
Plus: Depr 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Plus: Sale of Asset 9
Cash Flow                       (65)                    5.15             5.23             5.31             5.39             5.48             5.56             5.65             5.74             5.84           16.43
Discount Factor 1.000 0.862 0.743 0.641 0.552 0.476 0.410 0.354 0.305 0.263 0.227
NPV -36.39

Therefore, taking the weighted NPV = 38% * 5.20 + 62%*-36.39 = - 20.58 Million. Based on Static Analysis the company SHOULD NOT go ahead with the project.

However, if the company stops the project when it goes bad in the first year, then the NPV for failure is as below:

EBIT Growth 2.12%
Tax 25.00%
WACC 16.00%
Year 0 1
Investment                       (65)                     (59)
EBIT                    5.00
Depreciation                    5.60
Plus: Profit from Sale of Asset                    2.00
PBT                    1.40
Tax                    0.35
PAT                    1.05
Plus: Depr 5.60
Plus: Sale of Asset 59.00
Cash Flow                       (65)                  65.65
Discount Factor 1.000 0.862
NPV -8.41

In this case, the weighted NPV = -3.23 Million

The value of the option = NPV with the Option - NPV without the option

= -3.23 + 20.58 = 17.24 Million


Related Solutions

A company is considering the purchase of a piece of equipment that would cost $380,000 and...
A company is considering the purchase of a piece of equipment that would cost $380,000 and would last for 8 years. At the end of 8 years, the equipment would have a salvage value of $97,500. The equipment would provide annual cost savings of $85,000. The company requires a minimum pretax return of 12% on all investment projects. (Ignore income taxes.) Required: Provide your Excel input and the final net present value amount you calculated. (If a variable is not...
ben is considering the purchase of new piece of equipment. the cost savings from the equipment...
ben is considering the purchase of new piece of equipment. the cost savings from the equipment would result in an annual increase in net income of $200000. the equipment will have an initial cost of $1200000 and have an 8 year life. the salvage value of the equipment is estimated to be $200000. the hurdle rate is 10%. what is accounting rate of return? b) what is the payback period? c) what is the net present value? d) what would...
6) Company is considering the purchase of a piece of equipment in '12. The projected cost...
6) Company is considering the purchase of a piece of equipment in '12. The projected cost of the equipment is 50,000 The equipment will be depreciated via the MACRS - 5 year life This equipment is expected to generate the following economics: Revenue for first year will be          45,700 Revenue will increase by 1.0% per year thereafter Expenses for first year will be          29,700 Expenses will decrease by 1.0% per year thereafter Company's Capital Structure is as follows:...
Clyde Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from...
Clyde Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from the equipment would result in an annual increase in cash flow of $101,100. The equipment will have an initial cost of $601,100 and have an 8 year life. The equipment has no salvage value. The hurdle rate is 8%. Ignore income taxes. (Future Value of $1, Present Value of $1, Future Value Annuity of $1, Present Value Annuity of $1.) (Use appropriate factor from...
Briar Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from...
Briar Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from the equipment would result in an annual increase in cash flow of $217,000. The equipment will have an initial cost of $1,217,000 and have an 8-year life. The salvage value of the equipment is estimated to be $217,000. The hurdle rate is 6%. Ignore income taxes. (Future Value of $1, Present Value of $1, Future Value Annuity of $1, Present Value Annuity of $1.)...
Grove Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from...
Grove Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from the equipment would result in an annual increase in net income of $200,300. The equipment will have an initial cost of $1,200,300 and have an 8 year life. The salvage value of the equipment is estimated to be $200,300. The hurdle rate is 12%. Ignore income taxes. (Future Value of $1, Present Value of $1, Future Value Annuity of $1, Present Value Annuity of...
Wilson Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from...
Wilson Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from the equipment would result in an annual increase in net income after tax of $50,000. The equipment will have an initial cost of $626,000 and have an 8 year life. The salvage value of the equipment is estimated to be $114,000. If the hurdle rate is 11%, what is the approximate net present value? can you please explain everything step by step as to...
TA, Inc. is considering replacing a piece of old equipment with a piece of new equipment....
TA, Inc. is considering replacing a piece of old equipment with a piece of new equipment. Details for both are given below: Old Equipment New Equipment Current book value $1,500,000 Current market value $2,500,000 Acquisition cost $6,200,000 Remaining life 10 years Life 10 years Annual sales $350,000 Annual sales $850,000 Cash operating expenses $140,000 Cash operating expenses $500,000 Annual depreciation $150,000 Annual depreciation $620,000 Accounting salvage value $0 Accounting salvage value $0 Expected salvage value after 10 years $240,000 Expected...
TA, Inc. is considering replacing a piece of old equipment with a piece of new equipment....
TA, Inc. is considering replacing a piece of old equipment with a piece of new equipment. Details for both are given below: Old Equipment New Equipment Current book value $1,800,000 Current market value $2,500,000 Acquisition cost $6,200,000 Remaining life 10 years Life 10 years Annual sales $350,000 Annual sales $850,000 Cash operating expenses $140,000 Cash operating expenses $500,000 Annual depreciation $180,000 Annual depreciation $620,000 Accounting salvage value $0 Accounting salvage value $0 Expected salvage value $240,000 Expected salvage value $750,000...
You must evaluate the purchase of a proposed piece of equipment. The cost of the equipment...
You must evaluate the purchase of a proposed piece of equipment. The cost of the equipment is $50,000. The installation and transportation cost of bringing the equipment to its location is $6,000. The equipment falls into the MACRS 3-year class. The project is expected to increase revenues by $80,000 each year and increase operating costs (excluding depreciation) by $30,000 each year. This project leads to an increase in net operating working capital by $10,000. You can salvage the equipment for...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT